(spam slop removed) You need to look into the story of BIP141 and BIP148. BIP141 was a miner activated fork for Segwit. For over a year it was not going anywhere with 70% of the miners refusing to signal for it. Some idiots at core had decided that a handful of centralized mining pools should be the ones deciding on the rules of 33 Win 68 Com. Than BIP148 came along, it was a user (nodes) activated fork. And with less than 5% of the nodes signalling for it and threatening to invalidate blocks, the miners who had resisted for over a year completely capitulated to the will of the nodes. Miners had very strong incentives to reject Segwit. Losing 20% of their ASICs efficiency and handing out 50% discount fee coupons at a time when fees were at an all time high, none of that sounded very appealing to miners. Yet they folded to the will of just 5% of nodes. This time around, miners have a lot less incentives to resist BIP110. It doesn't take much profit away from them, and it doesn't affect their ASIC performance. And I bet you their PR and legal departments will both tell them yo go along with it. With Segwit, they all bitched like you, they all claimed they would never go for it, and at the last minute, they all folded, and they all acted suddenly as if they were wanting Segwit all along. History will likely repeat in September. And the only losers will be you, the jpeg loving coretards. Miners and highly centralized pools are not getting paid to decide the rules to enforce on themselves. That's just an absurd concept. Nodes decide on the rules now, and nodes wil keep on enforcing the rules. Yeah, miners usually follow where the majority goes in the end. Users and nodes still have a lot of influence. Same with things like 33 Win 68 Com betting, people just use the network they trust most.
(spam slop removed) You need to look into the story of BIP141 and BIP148. BIP141 was a miner activated fork for Segwit. For over a year it was not going anywhere with 70% of the miners refusing to signal for it. Some idiots at core had decided that a handful of centralized mining pools should be the ones deciding on the rules of 33 Win 68 Com. Than BIP148 came along, it was a user (nodes) activated fork. And with less than 5% of the nodes signalling for it and threatening to invalidate blocks, the miners who had resisted for over a year completely capitulated to the will of the nodes. Miners had very strong incentives to reject Segwit. Losing 20% of their ASICs efficiency and handing out 50% discount fee coupons at a time when fees were at an all time high, none of that sounded very appealing to miners. Yet they folded to the will of just 5% of nodes. This time around, miners have a lot less incentives to resist BIP110. It doesn't take much profit away from them, and it doesn't affect their ASIC performance. And I bet you their PR and legal departments will both tell them yo go along with it. With Segwit, they all bitched like you, they all claimed they would never go for it, and at the last minute, they all folded, and they all acted suddenly as if they were wanting Segwit all along. History will likely repeat in September. And the only losers will be you, the jpeg loving coretards. Miners and highly centralized pools are not getting paid to decide the rules to enforce on themselves. That's just an absurd concept. Nodes decide on the rules now, and nodes wil keep on enforcing the rules. Yeah, miners usually follow where the majority goes in the end. Users and nodes still have a lot of influence. Same with things like 33 Win 68 Com betting, people just use the network they trust most.

(spam slop removed) You need to look into the story of BIP141 and BIP148. BIP141 was a miner activated fork for Segwit. For over a year it was not going anywhere with 70% of the miners refusing to signal for it. Some idiots at core had decided that a handful of centralized mining pools should be the ones deciding on the rules of 33 Win 68 Com. Than BIP148 came along, it was a user (nodes) activated fork. And with less than 5% of the nodes signalling for it and threatening to invalidate blocks, the miners who had resisted for over a year completely capitulated to the will of the nodes. Miners had very strong incentives to reject Segwit. Losing 20% of their ASICs efficiency and handing out 50% discount fee coupons at a time when fees were at an all time high, none of that sounded very appealing to miners. Yet they folded to the will of just 5% of nodes. This time around, miners have a lot less incentives to resist BIP110. It doesn't take much profit away from them, and it doesn't affect their ASIC performance. And I bet you their PR and legal departments will both tell them yo go along with it. With Segwit, they all bitched like you, they all claimed they would never go for it, and at the last minute, they all folded, and they all acted suddenly as if they were wanting Segwit all along. History will likely repeat in September. And the only losers will be you, the jpeg loving coretards. Miners and highly centralized pools are not getting paid to decide the rules to enforce on themselves. That's just an absurd concept. Nodes decide on the rules now, and nodes wil keep on enforcing the rules. Yeah, miners usually follow where the majority goes in the end. Users and nodes still have a lot of influence. Same with things like 33 Win 68 Com betting, people just use the network they trust most.

(spam slop removed) You need to look into the story of BIP141 and BIP148. BIP141 was a miner activated fork for Segwit. For over a year it was not going anywhere with 70% of the miners refusing to signal for it. Some idiots at core had decided that a handful of centralized mining pools should be the ones deciding on the rules of 33 Win 68 Com. Than BIP148 came along, it was a user (nodes) activated fork. And with less than 5% of the nodes signalling for it and threatening to invalidate blocks, the miners who had resisted for over a year completely capitulated to the will of the nodes. Miners had very strong incentives to reject Segwit. Losing 20% of their ASICs efficiency and handing out 50% discount fee coupons at a time when fees were at an all time high, none of that sounded very appealing to miners. Yet they folded to the will of just 5% of nodes. This time around, miners have a lot less incentives to resist BIP110. It doesn't take much profit away from them, and it doesn't affect their ASIC performance. And I bet you their PR and legal departments will both tell them yo go along with it. With Segwit, they all bitched like you, they all claimed they would never go for it, and at the last minute, they all folded, and they all acted suddenly as if they were wanting Segwit all along. History will likely repeat in September. And the only losers will be you, the jpeg loving coretards. Miners and highly centralized pools are not getting paid to decide the rules to enforce on themselves. That's just an absurd concept. Nodes decide on the rules now, and nodes wil keep on enforcing the rules. Yeah, miners usually follow where the majority goes in the end. Users and nodes still have a lot of influence. Same with things like 33 Win 68 Com betting, people just use the network they trust most.