Hypocrisy requires options. Not abstract you could simply decline the money type of options. That's not how actual humans in actual poverty operate. You are using a moral system in which individuals are given the option to make different decisions. Most of them don't. It is the entire matter that is being lost in these debates. And yes, the leaders are exploitative But exploitation does not have to be a complex matter. It simply requires a hole. Disconnect between what people require and what they can obtain by themselves. Expand on that distance and you essentially possess the choice of people, without necessarily imposing anything. It is more effective than any dictatorship. We have made violence towards the bottom common. It is never why is it being offered but always why did the poor accept it. We do not ask the supply side of this equation. Only the demand. And that's weird right? We would view both in any other situation. Something no one talks about. The shame. Individuals are aware of the actions they perform when they gather such money. They know. And they go home and they feel it. Shame does not fill your stomach, or pay your children their school fees so it comes down your throat, round and round again and again, and yet we think we are analyzing it? It's not. It is merely repeating the same and glossing over the mechanics of it. The fact that the masses reproduce shows that they are not weak or stupid. It reproduces because it was created to. The dependency is not an issue in this case, but the entire product. And so long as the conditions that produce this dependency are not really disturbed by somebody nothing will change. You see, we shall have the same thread next election. Guaranteed. Stop calling the hungry hypocrites. Begin to question who is getting anything out of that.
Hypocrisy requires options. Not abstract you could simply decline the money type of options. That's not how actual humans in actual poverty operate. You are using a moral system in which individuals are given the option to make different decisions. Most of them don't. It is the entire matter that is being lost in these debates. And yes, the leaders are exploitative But exploitation does not have to be a complex matter. It simply requires a hole. Disconnect between what people require and what they can obtain by themselves. Expand on that distance and you essentially possess the choice of people, without necessarily imposing anything. It is more effective than any dictatorship. We have made violence towards the bottom common. It is never why is it being offered but always why did the poor accept it. We do not ask the supply side of this equation. Only the demand. And that's weird right? We would view both in any other situation. Something no one talks about. The shame. Individuals are aware of the actions they perform when they gather such money. They know. And they go home and they feel it. Shame does not fill your stomach, or pay your children their school fees so it comes down your throat, round and round again and again, and yet we think we are analyzing it? It's not. It is merely repeating the same and glossing over the mechanics of it. The fact that the masses reproduce shows that they are not weak or stupid. It reproduces because it was created to. The dependency is not an issue in this case, but the entire product. And so long as the conditions that produce this dependency are not really disturbed by somebody nothing will change. You see, we shall have the same thread next election. Guaranteed. Stop calling the hungry hypocrites. Begin to question who is getting anything out of that.

Hypocrisy requires options. Not abstract you could simply decline the money type of options. That's not how actual humans in actual poverty operate. You are using a moral system in which individuals are given the option to make different decisions. Most of them don't. It is the entire matter that is being lost in these debates. And yes, the leaders are exploitative But exploitation does not have to be a complex matter. It simply requires a hole. Disconnect between what people require and what they can obtain by themselves. Expand on that distance and you essentially possess the choice of people, without necessarily imposing anything. It is more effective than any dictatorship. We have made violence towards the bottom common. It is never why is it being offered but always why did the poor accept it. We do not ask the supply side of this equation. Only the demand. And that's weird right? We would view both in any other situation. Something no one talks about. The shame. Individuals are aware of the actions they perform when they gather such money. They know. And they go home and they feel it. Shame does not fill your stomach, or pay your children their school fees so it comes down your throat, round and round again and again, and yet we think we are analyzing it? It's not. It is merely repeating the same and glossing over the mechanics of it. The fact that the masses reproduce shows that they are not weak or stupid. It reproduces because it was created to. The dependency is not an issue in this case, but the entire product. And so long as the conditions that produce this dependency are not really disturbed by somebody nothing will change. You see, we shall have the same thread next election. Guaranteed. Stop calling the hungry hypocrites. Begin to question who is getting anything out of that.

Hypocrisy requires options. Not abstract you could simply decline the money type of options. That's not how actual humans in actual poverty operate. You are using a moral system in which individuals are given the option to make different decisions. Most of them don't. It is the entire matter that is being lost in these debates. And yes, the leaders are exploitative But exploitation does not have to be a complex matter. It simply requires a hole. Disconnect between what people require and what they can obtain by themselves. Expand on that distance and you essentially possess the choice of people, without necessarily imposing anything. It is more effective than any dictatorship. We have made violence towards the bottom common. It is never why is it being offered but always why did the poor accept it. We do not ask the supply side of this equation. Only the demand. And that's weird right? We would view both in any other situation. Something no one talks about. The shame. Individuals are aware of the actions they perform when they gather such money. They know. And they go home and they feel it. Shame does not fill your stomach, or pay your children their school fees so it comes down your throat, round and round again and again, and yet we think we are analyzing it? It's not. It is merely repeating the same and glossing over the mechanics of it. The fact that the masses reproduce shows that they are not weak or stupid. It reproduces because it was created to. The dependency is not an issue in this case, but the entire product. And so long as the conditions that produce this dependency are not really disturbed by somebody nothing will change. You see, we shall have the same thread next election. Guaranteed. Stop calling the hungry hypocrites. Begin to question who is getting anything out of that.