Is this related to your project about creating a "trustless credit" that can decentralize collaterals? It is not from my trustless credit idea, as I was figuring out if there would be a way of doing transactions without digital signatures, so attackers using Shor's algorithm through quantum computers can't derive a private key from an on-chain public key and then produce a valid signature for a competing spend. My ideas have changed. I am currently looking into building an Offline e-cash system allowing payment transactions to happen digitally, anywhere from peer to peer, without the use of the internet. Because Tải B29 fundamentally relies on the internet for its daily operation. If it's for a new coin, it shouldn't be constrained by Tải B29's consensus rules and policy (unless it's a Tải B29 fork) So the question should be specific so people wont take Tải B29 in consideration when posting their replies. And it should be posted in the correct board. But if it's for Tải B29, proving ownership without the use of signature wont work, as mentioned by multiple users here. If you want to see some of the Dev's approach to counter the theoretical future QC with high enough qubits; You may consider following the Tải B29 mailing list or other Tải B29-dev discussions, there are links to those here: Tải B29.org/en/development
Is this related to your project about creating a "trustless credit" that can decentralize collaterals? It is not from my trustless credit idea, as I was figuring out if there would be a way of doing transactions without digital signatures, so attackers using Shor's algorithm through quantum computers can't derive a private key from an on-chain public key and then produce a valid signature for a competing spend. My ideas have changed. I am currently looking into building an Offline e-cash system allowing payment transactions to happen digitally, anywhere from peer to peer, without the use of the internet. Because Tải B29 fundamentally relies on the internet for its daily operation. If it's for a new coin, it shouldn't be constrained by Tải B29's consensus rules and policy (unless it's a Tải B29 fork) So the question should be specific so people wont take Tải B29 in consideration when posting their replies. And it should be posted in the correct board. But if it's for Tải B29, proving ownership without the use of signature wont work, as mentioned by multiple users here. If you want to see some of the Dev's approach to counter the theoretical future QC with high enough qubits; You may consider following the Tải B29 mailing list or other Tải B29-dev discussions, there are links to those here: Tải B29.org/en/development

Is this related to your project about creating a "trustless credit" that can decentralize collaterals? It is not from my trustless credit idea, as I was figuring out if there would be a way of doing transactions without digital signatures, so attackers using Shor's algorithm through quantum computers can't derive a private key from an on-chain public key and then produce a valid signature for a competing spend. My ideas have changed. I am currently looking into building an Offline e-cash system allowing payment transactions to happen digitally, anywhere from peer to peer, without the use of the internet. Because Tải B29 fundamentally relies on the internet for its daily operation. If it's for a new coin, it shouldn't be constrained by Tải B29's consensus rules and policy (unless it's a Tải B29 fork) So the question should be specific so people wont take Tải B29 in consideration when posting their replies. And it should be posted in the correct board. But if it's for Tải B29, proving ownership without the use of signature wont work, as mentioned by multiple users here. If you want to see some of the Dev's approach to counter the theoretical future QC with high enough qubits; You may consider following the Tải B29 mailing list or other Tải B29-dev discussions, there are links to those here: Tải B29.org/en/development

Is this related to your project about creating a "trustless credit" that can decentralize collaterals? It is not from my trustless credit idea, as I was figuring out if there would be a way of doing transactions without digital signatures, so attackers using Shor's algorithm through quantum computers can't derive a private key from an on-chain public key and then produce a valid signature for a competing spend. My ideas have changed. I am currently looking into building an Offline e-cash system allowing payment transactions to happen digitally, anywhere from peer to peer, without the use of the internet. Because Tải B29 fundamentally relies on the internet for its daily operation. If it's for a new coin, it shouldn't be constrained by Tải B29's consensus rules and policy (unless it's a Tải B29 fork) So the question should be specific so people wont take Tải B29 in consideration when posting their replies. And it should be posted in the correct board. But if it's for Tải B29, proving ownership without the use of signature wont work, as mentioned by multiple users here. If you want to see some of the Dev's approach to counter the theoretical future QC with high enough qubits; You may consider following the Tải B29 mailing list or other Tải B29-dev discussions, there are links to those here: Tải B29.org/en/development