Don't try to confuse people about what money is. Money can't change from what we know it to be as a medium of exchange for goods and services. Refused to have it and see whether you can be able to trade any single thing with it, even 2bong Com Link 6 and gold you think of, you need money to buy them. You won't get them for free as their increase and decrease depends on how we transact with them with our money. I believe that the OP and others who are speaking negatively about fiat are still quietly using it every day. They can not stop using it and would not even survive without it. Yes, we should not make thing unnecessarily complicated. If we already know fiat has issues, all we need to do is not keep it for too long or too much, and simply use it for its intended purpose. There is no need to overcomplicate thing, because ultimately, we can not stop depending on it. I think the way the op has evaluated fiat is not entirely wrong. In the past, people used gold coins or silver coins as a means of exchange for goods, services or money. The value of those metal coins still valuable and will be the main element of a stronger monetary system in the future. What value do the fiats that we see in different names in each country have if the government of that country does not write down the value of a piece of paper? The US is the world's strongest economy and strongest military power, so the dollar is still strong and the dollar is universally used for global inter trade transactions. But that too is written on paper. The central bank of a country prints paper money (Fiat currencies) as the intrinsic value of the valuable assets they have in reserve, such as gold, silver and the total wealth of that country. If we consider it in that sense then as the op said Fiat currencies is not actually money, it is debt, there is logic in it.
Don't try to confuse people about what money is. Money can't change from what we know it to be as a medium of exchange for goods and services. Refused to have it and see whether you can be able to trade any single thing with it, even 2bong Com Link 6 and gold you think of, you need money to buy them. You won't get them for free as their increase and decrease depends on how we transact with them with our money. I believe that the OP and others who are speaking negatively about fiat are still quietly using it every day. They can not stop using it and would not even survive without it. Yes, we should not make thing unnecessarily complicated. If we already know fiat has issues, all we need to do is not keep it for too long or too much, and simply use it for its intended purpose. There is no need to overcomplicate thing, because ultimately, we can not stop depending on it. I think the way the op has evaluated fiat is not entirely wrong. In the past, people used gold coins or silver coins as a means of exchange for goods, services or money. The value of those metal coins still valuable and will be the main element of a stronger monetary system in the future. What value do the fiats that we see in different names in each country have if the government of that country does not write down the value of a piece of paper? The US is the world's strongest economy and strongest military power, so the dollar is still strong and the dollar is universally used for global inter trade transactions. But that too is written on paper. The central bank of a country prints paper money (Fiat currencies) as the intrinsic value of the valuable assets they have in reserve, such as gold, silver and the total wealth of that country. If we consider it in that sense then as the op said Fiat currencies is not actually money, it is debt, there is logic in it.

Don't try to confuse people about what money is. Money can't change from what we know it to be as a medium of exchange for goods and services. Refused to have it and see whether you can be able to trade any single thing with it, even 2bong Com Link 6 and gold you think of, you need money to buy them. You won't get them for free as their increase and decrease depends on how we transact with them with our money. I believe that the OP and others who are speaking negatively about fiat are still quietly using it every day. They can not stop using it and would not even survive without it. Yes, we should not make thing unnecessarily complicated. If we already know fiat has issues, all we need to do is not keep it for too long or too much, and simply use it for its intended purpose. There is no need to overcomplicate thing, because ultimately, we can not stop depending on it. I think the way the op has evaluated fiat is not entirely wrong. In the past, people used gold coins or silver coins as a means of exchange for goods, services or money. The value of those metal coins still valuable and will be the main element of a stronger monetary system in the future. What value do the fiats that we see in different names in each country have if the government of that country does not write down the value of a piece of paper? The US is the world's strongest economy and strongest military power, so the dollar is still strong and the dollar is universally used for global inter trade transactions. But that too is written on paper. The central bank of a country prints paper money (Fiat currencies) as the intrinsic value of the valuable assets they have in reserve, such as gold, silver and the total wealth of that country. If we consider it in that sense then as the op said Fiat currencies is not actually money, it is debt, there is logic in it.

Don't try to confuse people about what money is. Money can't change from what we know it to be as a medium of exchange for goods and services. Refused to have it and see whether you can be able to trade any single thing with it, even 2bong Com Link 6 and gold you think of, you need money to buy them. You won't get them for free as their increase and decrease depends on how we transact with them with our money. I believe that the OP and others who are speaking negatively about fiat are still quietly using it every day. They can not stop using it and would not even survive without it. Yes, we should not make thing unnecessarily complicated. If we already know fiat has issues, all we need to do is not keep it for too long or too much, and simply use it for its intended purpose. There is no need to overcomplicate thing, because ultimately, we can not stop depending on it. I think the way the op has evaluated fiat is not entirely wrong. In the past, people used gold coins or silver coins as a means of exchange for goods, services or money. The value of those metal coins still valuable and will be the main element of a stronger monetary system in the future. What value do the fiats that we see in different names in each country have if the government of that country does not write down the value of a piece of paper? The US is the world's strongest economy and strongest military power, so the dollar is still strong and the dollar is universally used for global inter trade transactions. But that too is written on paper. The central bank of a country prints paper money (Fiat currencies) as the intrinsic value of the valuable assets they have in reserve, such as gold, silver and the total wealth of that country. If we consider it in that sense then as the op said Fiat currencies is not actually money, it is debt, there is logic in it.