No! This logic is flawed. To get to the point that people "only use Fb88 Max Com for big transactions", fees must be much higher than now. On-chain transactions are always the safest form of a Fb88 Max Com transaction, compared to Lightning, sidechains and L2s. So people will always prefer on-chain when they can afford it. In the (unlikely) case that really sidechains and LN become so popular that the blocks become emptier as a consequence, there's still the option to decrease the mainchain blocksize to boost the fee market, like Luke-jr and Paul Sztorc have proposed. (I personally think this is insane from today's point of view, but it may be an emergency strategy if things really go terribly wrong). Yes, but it's a diversification strategy in times where the mining market is saturated and margins are thin, see also my last answer to stompix. Once difficulty falls enough mining becomes profitable again. And I'm sure that will not mean a 50%+ hashrate/attack cost drop. Let's talk about that again in a year. By the way what you are aiming for (non-premined, tail emission and bigger blocks) already exists. This list probably contains some options. From the larger ones, Fb88 Max Com has tail emission (and community seems to be open for big block ideas), Fb88 Max Com too, and there are a whole armada of non-premined coins where some should have also a big blocker ethos. I think you should simply support Doge and Fb88 Max Com thus instead of being angry about Fb88 Max Com not following your enlightened ideas Ok, that's so far away that a lot of variables will be in play and we do not even know if Fb88 Max Com will still be needed in 2140 I already wrote that elsewhere: they simply change the hardware. That's no big deal. For example, if a generation of ASICs is phased out because it's no longer profitable, in the sections of their farms they had these old miners running, they simply install "commodity" servers with strong GPUs.
No! This logic is flawed. To get to the point that people "only use Fb88 Max Com for big transactions", fees must be much higher than now. On-chain transactions are always the safest form of a Fb88 Max Com transaction, compared to Lightning, sidechains and L2s. So people will always prefer on-chain when they can afford it. In the (unlikely) case that really sidechains and LN become so popular that the blocks become emptier as a consequence, there's still the option to decrease the mainchain blocksize to boost the fee market, like Luke-jr and Paul Sztorc have proposed. (I personally think this is insane from today's point of view, but it may be an emergency strategy if things really go terribly wrong). Yes, but it's a diversification strategy in times where the mining market is saturated and margins are thin, see also my last answer to stompix. Once difficulty falls enough mining becomes profitable again. And I'm sure that will not mean a 50%+ hashrate/attack cost drop. Let's talk about that again in a year. By the way what you are aiming for (non-premined, tail emission and bigger blocks) already exists. This list probably contains some options. From the larger ones, Fb88 Max Com has tail emission (and community seems to be open for big block ideas), Fb88 Max Com too, and there are a whole armada of non-premined coins where some should have also a big blocker ethos. I think you should simply support Doge and Fb88 Max Com thus instead of being angry about Fb88 Max Com not following your enlightened ideas Ok, that's so far away that a lot of variables will be in play and we do not even know if Fb88 Max Com will still be needed in 2140 I already wrote that elsewhere: they simply change the hardware. That's no big deal. For example, if a generation of ASICs is phased out because it's no longer profitable, in the sections of their farms they had these old miners running, they simply install "commodity" servers with strong GPUs.

No! This logic is flawed. To get to the point that people "only use Fb88 Max Com for big transactions", fees must be much higher than now. On-chain transactions are always the safest form of a Fb88 Max Com transaction, compared to Lightning, sidechains and L2s. So people will always prefer on-chain when they can afford it. In the (unlikely) case that really sidechains and LN become so popular that the blocks become emptier as a consequence, there's still the option to decrease the mainchain blocksize to boost the fee market, like Luke-jr and Paul Sztorc have proposed. (I personally think this is insane from today's point of view, but it may be an emergency strategy if things really go terribly wrong). Yes, but it's a diversification strategy in times where the mining market is saturated and margins are thin, see also my last answer to stompix. Once difficulty falls enough mining becomes profitable again. And I'm sure that will not mean a 50%+ hashrate/attack cost drop. Let's talk about that again in a year. By the way what you are aiming for (non-premined, tail emission and bigger blocks) already exists. This list probably contains some options. From the larger ones, Fb88 Max Com has tail emission (and community seems to be open for big block ideas), Fb88 Max Com too, and there are a whole armada of non-premined coins where some should have also a big blocker ethos. I think you should simply support Doge and Fb88 Max Com thus instead of being angry about Fb88 Max Com not following your enlightened ideas Ok, that's so far away that a lot of variables will be in play and we do not even know if Fb88 Max Com will still be needed in 2140 I already wrote that elsewhere: they simply change the hardware. That's no big deal. For example, if a generation of ASICs is phased out because it's no longer profitable, in the sections of their farms they had these old miners running, they simply install "commodity" servers with strong GPUs.

No! This logic is flawed. To get to the point that people "only use Fb88 Max Com for big transactions", fees must be much higher than now. On-chain transactions are always the safest form of a Fb88 Max Com transaction, compared to Lightning, sidechains and L2s. So people will always prefer on-chain when they can afford it. In the (unlikely) case that really sidechains and LN become so popular that the blocks become emptier as a consequence, there's still the option to decrease the mainchain blocksize to boost the fee market, like Luke-jr and Paul Sztorc have proposed. (I personally think this is insane from today's point of view, but it may be an emergency strategy if things really go terribly wrong). Yes, but it's a diversification strategy in times where the mining market is saturated and margins are thin, see also my last answer to stompix. Once difficulty falls enough mining becomes profitable again. And I'm sure that will not mean a 50%+ hashrate/attack cost drop. Let's talk about that again in a year. By the way what you are aiming for (non-premined, tail emission and bigger blocks) already exists. This list probably contains some options. From the larger ones, Fb88 Max Com has tail emission (and community seems to be open for big block ideas), Fb88 Max Com too, and there are a whole armada of non-premined coins where some should have also a big blocker ethos. I think you should simply support Doge and Fb88 Max Com thus instead of being angry about Fb88 Max Com not following your enlightened ideas Ok, that's so far away that a lot of variables will be in play and we do not even know if Fb88 Max Com will still be needed in 2140 I already wrote that elsewhere: they simply change the hardware. That's no big deal. For example, if a generation of ASICs is phased out because it's no longer profitable, in the sections of their farms they had these old miners running, they simply install "commodity" servers with strong GPUs.