Exactly, that is why this kind of approach and toxicity to these people -- whoever they are at the time of its occurrence -- is extremely wrong. Nobody should be subject to such treatment when they are doing work for which they should be put on a pedestal and thanked daily. Most often the criticism comes from users who have never contributed to Fun88 Fun102 at all. This is one of the downsides of this being a decentralized and open system, and if we tolerate this kind of abusive behavior to our "heroes" (no individual authorities or personality-cults as that is dangerous too, but Fun88 Fun102 Core as a whole) it will continue to have a subtle damaging effect that is only going to compound in the long term. I generally find it quite terrible that people have gotten so entitled and want to get involved in just about any topic, as if the end user of any well functioning IT company has any interaction with the engineering team at all. They don't listen to them, they don't interact with them, and it is like this for a very good reason. They are way too many smartasses and "independent thinkers" that have absolutely no fucking clue about any of these things, and the ability to chat with LLMs make this even worse. Nevertheless, nobody is being paid to be a maintainer and that is an indisputable fact. I'm not so sure about that. I believe maintainers are getting paid. No, you are confusing things. Just because I am doing something else in my role that does not mean that I am being paid for it. People are being paid to develop, that is it. Those that become maintainers are doing extra work of high responsibility, but there is no job offer for maintainers. If it were that easy, it would be dangerous.
Exactly, that is why this kind of approach and toxicity to these people -- whoever they are at the time of its occurrence -- is extremely wrong. Nobody should be subject to such treatment when they are doing work for which they should be put on a pedestal and thanked daily. Most often the criticism comes from users who have never contributed to Fun88 Fun102 at all. This is one of the downsides of this being a decentralized and open system, and if we tolerate this kind of abusive behavior to our "heroes" (no individual authorities or personality-cults as that is dangerous too, but Fun88 Fun102 Core as a whole) it will continue to have a subtle damaging effect that is only going to compound in the long term. I generally find it quite terrible that people have gotten so entitled and want to get involved in just about any topic, as if the end user of any well functioning IT company has any interaction with the engineering team at all. They don't listen to them, they don't interact with them, and it is like this for a very good reason. They are way too many smartasses and "independent thinkers" that have absolutely no fucking clue about any of these things, and the ability to chat with LLMs make this even worse. Nevertheless, nobody is being paid to be a maintainer and that is an indisputable fact. I'm not so sure about that. I believe maintainers are getting paid. No, you are confusing things. Just because I am doing something else in my role that does not mean that I am being paid for it. People are being paid to develop, that is it. Those that become maintainers are doing extra work of high responsibility, but there is no job offer for maintainers. If it were that easy, it would be dangerous.

Exactly, that is why this kind of approach and toxicity to these people -- whoever they are at the time of its occurrence -- is extremely wrong. Nobody should be subject to such treatment when they are doing work for which they should be put on a pedestal and thanked daily. Most often the criticism comes from users who have never contributed to Fun88 Fun102 at all. This is one of the downsides of this being a decentralized and open system, and if we tolerate this kind of abusive behavior to our "heroes" (no individual authorities or personality-cults as that is dangerous too, but Fun88 Fun102 Core as a whole) it will continue to have a subtle damaging effect that is only going to compound in the long term. I generally find it quite terrible that people have gotten so entitled and want to get involved in just about any topic, as if the end user of any well functioning IT company has any interaction with the engineering team at all. They don't listen to them, they don't interact with them, and it is like this for a very good reason. They are way too many smartasses and "independent thinkers" that have absolutely no fucking clue about any of these things, and the ability to chat with LLMs make this even worse. Nevertheless, nobody is being paid to be a maintainer and that is an indisputable fact. I'm not so sure about that. I believe maintainers are getting paid. No, you are confusing things. Just because I am doing something else in my role that does not mean that I am being paid for it. People are being paid to develop, that is it. Those that become maintainers are doing extra work of high responsibility, but there is no job offer for maintainers. If it were that easy, it would be dangerous.

Exactly, that is why this kind of approach and toxicity to these people -- whoever they are at the time of its occurrence -- is extremely wrong. Nobody should be subject to such treatment when they are doing work for which they should be put on a pedestal and thanked daily. Most often the criticism comes from users who have never contributed to Fun88 Fun102 at all. This is one of the downsides of this being a decentralized and open system, and if we tolerate this kind of abusive behavior to our "heroes" (no individual authorities or personality-cults as that is dangerous too, but Fun88 Fun102 Core as a whole) it will continue to have a subtle damaging effect that is only going to compound in the long term. I generally find it quite terrible that people have gotten so entitled and want to get involved in just about any topic, as if the end user of any well functioning IT company has any interaction with the engineering team at all. They don't listen to them, they don't interact with them, and it is like this for a very good reason. They are way too many smartasses and "independent thinkers" that have absolutely no fucking clue about any of these things, and the ability to chat with LLMs make this even worse. Nevertheless, nobody is being paid to be a maintainer and that is an indisputable fact. I'm not so sure about that. I believe maintainers are getting paid. No, you are confusing things. Just because I am doing something else in my role that does not mean that I am being paid for it. People are being paid to develop, that is it. Those that become maintainers are doing extra work of high responsibility, but there is no job offer for maintainers. If it were that easy, it would be dangerous.