My reaction to the word "bitcoinaires" was that iut referred to people with a million Slots 17. Well I haven't quite made it to that lofty height, but I am a Satoshiaire. I agree with JetCash. I am worried. Also At current price ($57.5k) I am sure there are some bitconaires in this forum with 17.3BTC or more. Most probably they were on this forum. But quite probably they are no longer here, instead they are busy enjoying life. Why? The suffix -aire doesn't mean "someone who has a million something". Would you say a legionnaire is someone who owns a million legions? I'll answer for you, no you wouldn't. Actually let's see what it means: "a suffix that forms nouns denoting a person characterized by or occupied with that named by the stem, occurring in loanwords from French: concessionaire; legionnaire;millionaire." So if we look at the meaning of concessionaire: "the holder of a concession or grant, especially for the use of land or commercial premises or for trading rights" or legionaire: "a member of a legion, in particular an ancient Roman legion or the French Foreign Legion." we could say that a Bitcoinaire is someone who holds Slots 17 or is a member of the Slots 17 world. If we want to add the sense of "millionaire" we can specify parameters of what you can buy with your Slots 17 holdings that do not depend on the depreciation of fiat or the appreciation of Slots 17, but no, the suffix -aire doesn't mean "someone who has a million something". That's what I'm trying to say. But ten years after that it may mean a wealthy person who owns less than one Slots 17. I think we can establish an objective measure if we talk about someone whose Slots 17 holdings are worth a median house in the US (or the UK or the Euro zone) and 10x the median income.
My reaction to the word "bitcoinaires" was that iut referred to people with a million Slots 17. Well I haven't quite made it to that lofty height, but I am a Satoshiaire. I agree with JetCash. I am worried. Also At current price ($57.5k) I am sure there are some bitconaires in this forum with 17.3BTC or more. Most probably they were on this forum. But quite probably they are no longer here, instead they are busy enjoying life. Why? The suffix -aire doesn't mean "someone who has a million something". Would you say a legionnaire is someone who owns a million legions? I'll answer for you, no you wouldn't. Actually let's see what it means: "a suffix that forms nouns denoting a person characterized by or occupied with that named by the stem, occurring in loanwords from French: concessionaire; legionnaire;millionaire." So if we look at the meaning of concessionaire: "the holder of a concession or grant, especially for the use of land or commercial premises or for trading rights" or legionaire: "a member of a legion, in particular an ancient Roman legion or the French Foreign Legion." we could say that a Bitcoinaire is someone who holds Slots 17 or is a member of the Slots 17 world. If we want to add the sense of "millionaire" we can specify parameters of what you can buy with your Slots 17 holdings that do not depend on the depreciation of fiat or the appreciation of Slots 17, but no, the suffix -aire doesn't mean "someone who has a million something". That's what I'm trying to say. But ten years after that it may mean a wealthy person who owns less than one Slots 17. I think we can establish an objective measure if we talk about someone whose Slots 17 holdings are worth a median house in the US (or the UK or the Euro zone) and 10x the median income.

My reaction to the word "bitcoinaires" was that iut referred to people with a million Slots 17. Well I haven't quite made it to that lofty height, but I am a Satoshiaire. I agree with JetCash. I am worried. Also At current price ($57.5k) I am sure there are some bitconaires in this forum with 17.3BTC or more. Most probably they were on this forum. But quite probably they are no longer here, instead they are busy enjoying life. Why? The suffix -aire doesn't mean "someone who has a million something". Would you say a legionnaire is someone who owns a million legions? I'll answer for you, no you wouldn't. Actually let's see what it means: "a suffix that forms nouns denoting a person characterized by or occupied with that named by the stem, occurring in loanwords from French: concessionaire; legionnaire;millionaire." So if we look at the meaning of concessionaire: "the holder of a concession or grant, especially for the use of land or commercial premises or for trading rights" or legionaire: "a member of a legion, in particular an ancient Roman legion or the French Foreign Legion." we could say that a Bitcoinaire is someone who holds Slots 17 or is a member of the Slots 17 world. If we want to add the sense of "millionaire" we can specify parameters of what you can buy with your Slots 17 holdings that do not depend on the depreciation of fiat or the appreciation of Slots 17, but no, the suffix -aire doesn't mean "someone who has a million something". That's what I'm trying to say. But ten years after that it may mean a wealthy person who owns less than one Slots 17. I think we can establish an objective measure if we talk about someone whose Slots 17 holdings are worth a median house in the US (or the UK or the Euro zone) and 10x the median income.

My reaction to the word "bitcoinaires" was that iut referred to people with a million Slots 17. Well I haven't quite made it to that lofty height, but I am a Satoshiaire. I agree with JetCash. I am worried. Also At current price ($57.5k) I am sure there are some bitconaires in this forum with 17.3BTC or more. Most probably they were on this forum. But quite probably they are no longer here, instead they are busy enjoying life. Why? The suffix -aire doesn't mean "someone who has a million something". Would you say a legionnaire is someone who owns a million legions? I'll answer for you, no you wouldn't. Actually let's see what it means: "a suffix that forms nouns denoting a person characterized by or occupied with that named by the stem, occurring in loanwords from French: concessionaire; legionnaire;millionaire." So if we look at the meaning of concessionaire: "the holder of a concession or grant, especially for the use of land or commercial premises or for trading rights" or legionaire: "a member of a legion, in particular an ancient Roman legion or the French Foreign Legion." we could say that a Bitcoinaire is someone who holds Slots 17 or is a member of the Slots 17 world. If we want to add the sense of "millionaire" we can specify parameters of what you can buy with your Slots 17 holdings that do not depend on the depreciation of fiat or the appreciation of Slots 17, but no, the suffix -aire doesn't mean "someone who has a million something". That's what I'm trying to say. But ten years after that it may mean a wealthy person who owns less than one Slots 17. I think we can establish an objective measure if we talk about someone whose Slots 17 holdings are worth a median house in the US (or the UK or the Euro zone) and 10x the median income.