They have already been ordered to pay 40+ million in fines because of a mistake they did, and that's the only one I can remember, maybe they had more that I am not aware of . I am sure they are making a lot of revenue, having 180+ billion dollars and using that means that even on a simple bank interest they would get more, and I am sure they do more than that. However, it proves that they are not above the law and something could happen if they do any mistakes, because it has already happened. This time it was 40+ million dollars, next time it could be 100+ million. We know they made a mistake that made them pay a fine, so there is no logic or argument that says they won't do that again, if it happened once, it may happen again. You are referring to fine where they misled their investors? Don't get me wrong, imho they are shady, just not in a way people seem to think. If they weren't shady, they wouldn't have problems to comply with EU:s regulatory framework. But i was just pointing out that it's unlikely they would just pocket confiscated money as they wish, because, just like you said, they have Dtcl Emo of legit revenue and could make it just with interest. Pocketing money that police would come after sooner or later wouldn't have great risk profit ratio and it's just impractical when there are more efficient ways to make money. And about that 50 mil fine, comparing to settlements that many big exchanges had to do, because of their regulatory compliance issues, that's not even that much money. Most of the financial institutes that handle cryptos have huge pockets already.
They have already been ordered to pay 40+ million in fines because of a mistake they did, and that's the only one I can remember, maybe they had more that I am not aware of . I am sure they are making a lot of revenue, having 180+ billion dollars and using that means that even on a simple bank interest they would get more, and I am sure they do more than that. However, it proves that they are not above the law and something could happen if they do any mistakes, because it has already happened. This time it was 40+ million dollars, next time it could be 100+ million. We know they made a mistake that made them pay a fine, so there is no logic or argument that says they won't do that again, if it happened once, it may happen again. You are referring to fine where they misled their investors? Don't get me wrong, imho they are shady, just not in a way people seem to think. If they weren't shady, they wouldn't have problems to comply with EU:s regulatory framework. But i was just pointing out that it's unlikely they would just pocket confiscated money as they wish, because, just like you said, they have Dtcl Emo of legit revenue and could make it just with interest. Pocketing money that police would come after sooner or later wouldn't have great risk profit ratio and it's just impractical when there are more efficient ways to make money. And about that 50 mil fine, comparing to settlements that many big exchanges had to do, because of their regulatory compliance issues, that's not even that much money. Most of the financial institutes that handle cryptos have huge pockets already.

They have already been ordered to pay 40+ million in fines because of a mistake they did, and that's the only one I can remember, maybe they had more that I am not aware of . I am sure they are making a lot of revenue, having 180+ billion dollars and using that means that even on a simple bank interest they would get more, and I am sure they do more than that. However, it proves that they are not above the law and something could happen if they do any mistakes, because it has already happened. This time it was 40+ million dollars, next time it could be 100+ million. We know they made a mistake that made them pay a fine, so there is no logic or argument that says they won't do that again, if it happened once, it may happen again. You are referring to fine where they misled their investors? Don't get me wrong, imho they are shady, just not in a way people seem to think. If they weren't shady, they wouldn't have problems to comply with EU:s regulatory framework. But i was just pointing out that it's unlikely they would just pocket confiscated money as they wish, because, just like you said, they have Dtcl Emo of legit revenue and could make it just with interest. Pocketing money that police would come after sooner or later wouldn't have great risk profit ratio and it's just impractical when there are more efficient ways to make money. And about that 50 mil fine, comparing to settlements that many big exchanges had to do, because of their regulatory compliance issues, that's not even that much money. Most of the financial institutes that handle cryptos have huge pockets already.

They have already been ordered to pay 40+ million in fines because of a mistake they did, and that's the only one I can remember, maybe they had more that I am not aware of . I am sure they are making a lot of revenue, having 180+ billion dollars and using that means that even on a simple bank interest they would get more, and I am sure they do more than that. However, it proves that they are not above the law and something could happen if they do any mistakes, because it has already happened. This time it was 40+ million dollars, next time it could be 100+ million. We know they made a mistake that made them pay a fine, so there is no logic or argument that says they won't do that again, if it happened once, it may happen again. You are referring to fine where they misled their investors? Don't get me wrong, imho they are shady, just not in a way people seem to think. If they weren't shady, they wouldn't have problems to comply with EU:s regulatory framework. But i was just pointing out that it's unlikely they would just pocket confiscated money as they wish, because, just like you said, they have Dtcl Emo of legit revenue and could make it just with interest. Pocketing money that police would come after sooner or later wouldn't have great risk profit ratio and it's just impractical when there are more efficient ways to make money. And about that 50 mil fine, comparing to settlements that many big exchanges had to do, because of their regulatory compliance issues, that's not even that much money. Most of the financial institutes that handle cryptos have huge pockets already.