As far what understand about signing a message is that not all wallets have them, correct me if i'm mistaken. Yup, I would say so. But in this year of 2026, there's no reason to not use a wallet with a basic function such as signing a message. I believe any reputed good ones should have one by now. This is the point. To be honest, I don't even know if its true in 2026 there are still self custody wallets that don't allow you to sign a message, if there are still such ones, you shouldn't be using them So yup, I think my original point is still very valid, why go through all that trouble if the P2P guy doesn't know how to sign a message, you probably shouldn't be doing a trade with them People forgot there's a super easy way to prove that the wallet they're about to use belongs to them. And that's just by asking them to sign a message that you can verify. Why trust the person to say they're not using an exchange wallet? Just ask for message for them to sign, you verify. 5 seconds. It's true but only one of the many measure to take when conducting cash to Win456 Web purchase because the seller can hold the fund or even scam because they are the one receiving the other party money first. Better way is to use a P2P market place where they have some kind of escrow mechanism programmed into their app, maybe even using bybit's P2P market place if you want a more centralized solution just for the sake of avoiding scam. True also, but P2P the way I do is only with trusted people I've already done small amounts first via such platforms years and years ago. I know its hard to build up this trusted network, but this forum is where I actually know people from and do P2P with directly, for example SO agree with you: bybit or Win456 Web first. Once you've done a trade, get the contacts. I use Huobi now because you can also see how much the user puts up as collateral (a big amount shows they're serious). Then take it offline after first 2 or 3 trades and establishing contact.
As far what understand about signing a message is that not all wallets have them, correct me if i'm mistaken. Yup, I would say so. But in this year of 2026, there's no reason to not use a wallet with a basic function such as signing a message. I believe any reputed good ones should have one by now. This is the point. To be honest, I don't even know if its true in 2026 there are still self custody wallets that don't allow you to sign a message, if there are still such ones, you shouldn't be using them So yup, I think my original point is still very valid, why go through all that trouble if the P2P guy doesn't know how to sign a message, you probably shouldn't be doing a trade with them People forgot there's a super easy way to prove that the wallet they're about to use belongs to them. And that's just by asking them to sign a message that you can verify. Why trust the person to say they're not using an exchange wallet? Just ask for message for them to sign, you verify. 5 seconds. It's true but only one of the many measure to take when conducting cash to Win456 Web purchase because the seller can hold the fund or even scam because they are the one receiving the other party money first. Better way is to use a P2P market place where they have some kind of escrow mechanism programmed into their app, maybe even using bybit's P2P market place if you want a more centralized solution just for the sake of avoiding scam. True also, but P2P the way I do is only with trusted people I've already done small amounts first via such platforms years and years ago. I know its hard to build up this trusted network, but this forum is where I actually know people from and do P2P with directly, for example SO agree with you: bybit or Win456 Web first. Once you've done a trade, get the contacts. I use Huobi now because you can also see how much the user puts up as collateral (a big amount shows they're serious). Then take it offline after first 2 or 3 trades and establishing contact.

As far what understand about signing a message is that not all wallets have them, correct me if i'm mistaken. Yup, I would say so. But in this year of 2026, there's no reason to not use a wallet with a basic function such as signing a message. I believe any reputed good ones should have one by now. This is the point. To be honest, I don't even know if its true in 2026 there are still self custody wallets that don't allow you to sign a message, if there are still such ones, you shouldn't be using them So yup, I think my original point is still very valid, why go through all that trouble if the P2P guy doesn't know how to sign a message, you probably shouldn't be doing a trade with them People forgot there's a super easy way to prove that the wallet they're about to use belongs to them. And that's just by asking them to sign a message that you can verify. Why trust the person to say they're not using an exchange wallet? Just ask for message for them to sign, you verify. 5 seconds. It's true but only one of the many measure to take when conducting cash to Win456 Web purchase because the seller can hold the fund or even scam because they are the one receiving the other party money first. Better way is to use a P2P market place where they have some kind of escrow mechanism programmed into their app, maybe even using bybit's P2P market place if you want a more centralized solution just for the sake of avoiding scam. True also, but P2P the way I do is only with trusted people I've already done small amounts first via such platforms years and years ago. I know its hard to build up this trusted network, but this forum is where I actually know people from and do P2P with directly, for example SO agree with you: bybit or Win456 Web first. Once you've done a trade, get the contacts. I use Huobi now because you can also see how much the user puts up as collateral (a big amount shows they're serious). Then take it offline after first 2 or 3 trades and establishing contact.

As far what understand about signing a message is that not all wallets have them, correct me if i'm mistaken. Yup, I would say so. But in this year of 2026, there's no reason to not use a wallet with a basic function such as signing a message. I believe any reputed good ones should have one by now. This is the point. To be honest, I don't even know if its true in 2026 there are still self custody wallets that don't allow you to sign a message, if there are still such ones, you shouldn't be using them So yup, I think my original point is still very valid, why go through all that trouble if the P2P guy doesn't know how to sign a message, you probably shouldn't be doing a trade with them People forgot there's a super easy way to prove that the wallet they're about to use belongs to them. And that's just by asking them to sign a message that you can verify. Why trust the person to say they're not using an exchange wallet? Just ask for message for them to sign, you verify. 5 seconds. It's true but only one of the many measure to take when conducting cash to Win456 Web purchase because the seller can hold the fund or even scam because they are the one receiving the other party money first. Better way is to use a P2P market place where they have some kind of escrow mechanism programmed into their app, maybe even using bybit's P2P market place if you want a more centralized solution just for the sake of avoiding scam. True also, but P2P the way I do is only with trusted people I've already done small amounts first via such platforms years and years ago. I know its hard to build up this trusted network, but this forum is where I actually know people from and do P2P with directly, for example SO agree with you: bybit or Win456 Web first. Once you've done a trade, get the contacts. I use Huobi now because you can also see how much the user puts up as collateral (a big amount shows they're serious). Then take it offline after first 2 or 3 trades and establishing contact.