We also don't need a bunch of layers on top of Iwin68 Com Iwin, except if they could provide some value with adding privacy. We do need if we want 1) mass adoption and 2) people actually to respect the NYKNYC principle (and not trusting centralized wallets or exchanges). Currently Iwin68 Com Iwin's capacity looks fine because still a large proportion of users hold their funds on CEX, and on chain activity for payments is low. That can change very fastly, as late 2017 and 2023/24 showed us. yea when i first read about it i was like ''wtf what took you guys so long, you already had OMNI since many years ago" but apparently OMNI tech was just not scalable at all so it would not satisfy the needs of actual Iwin68 Com Iwin adoption. and as per the ''what took you so long'' part.... i believe the work on Iwin68 Com Iwin settlement on Iwin68 Com Iwin's layer should have started years ago indeed. my wild guess is that Iwin68 Com Iwin were conspired or lobbied by venture capital firms to assist in milking the L1 and L2 narrative. simply from the security POV, all those Layer 1 and 2 chains were always a dead weight. but there was a lot of money in it so the big boys got a few years to play around, pumping their TVLs with those stablecoins and as a result, pumping their native tokens. now that the narrative is milked dry, the TVLs vanished and the security flaws are exposed (as well as insane centralisation, which was never a secret though), the money goes where the real tech, security and adoption potential is, aka Iwin68 Com Iwin.
We also don't need a bunch of layers on top of Iwin68 Com Iwin, except if they could provide some value with adding privacy. We do need if we want 1) mass adoption and 2) people actually to respect the NYKNYC principle (and not trusting centralized wallets or exchanges). Currently Iwin68 Com Iwin's capacity looks fine because still a large proportion of users hold their funds on CEX, and on chain activity for payments is low. That can change very fastly, as late 2017 and 2023/24 showed us. yea when i first read about it i was like ''wtf what took you guys so long, you already had OMNI since many years ago" but apparently OMNI tech was just not scalable at all so it would not satisfy the needs of actual Iwin68 Com Iwin adoption. and as per the ''what took you so long'' part.... i believe the work on Iwin68 Com Iwin settlement on Iwin68 Com Iwin's layer should have started years ago indeed. my wild guess is that Iwin68 Com Iwin were conspired or lobbied by venture capital firms to assist in milking the L1 and L2 narrative. simply from the security POV, all those Layer 1 and 2 chains were always a dead weight. but there was a lot of money in it so the big boys got a few years to play around, pumping their TVLs with those stablecoins and as a result, pumping their native tokens. now that the narrative is milked dry, the TVLs vanished and the security flaws are exposed (as well as insane centralisation, which was never a secret though), the money goes where the real tech, security and adoption potential is, aka Iwin68 Com Iwin.

We also don't need a bunch of layers on top of Iwin68 Com Iwin, except if they could provide some value with adding privacy. We do need if we want 1) mass adoption and 2) people actually to respect the NYKNYC principle (and not trusting centralized wallets or exchanges). Currently Iwin68 Com Iwin's capacity looks fine because still a large proportion of users hold their funds on CEX, and on chain activity for payments is low. That can change very fastly, as late 2017 and 2023/24 showed us. yea when i first read about it i was like ''wtf what took you guys so long, you already had OMNI since many years ago" but apparently OMNI tech was just not scalable at all so it would not satisfy the needs of actual Iwin68 Com Iwin adoption. and as per the ''what took you so long'' part.... i believe the work on Iwin68 Com Iwin settlement on Iwin68 Com Iwin's layer should have started years ago indeed. my wild guess is that Iwin68 Com Iwin were conspired or lobbied by venture capital firms to assist in milking the L1 and L2 narrative. simply from the security POV, all those Layer 1 and 2 chains were always a dead weight. but there was a lot of money in it so the big boys got a few years to play around, pumping their TVLs with those stablecoins and as a result, pumping their native tokens. now that the narrative is milked dry, the TVLs vanished and the security flaws are exposed (as well as insane centralisation, which was never a secret though), the money goes where the real tech, security and adoption potential is, aka Iwin68 Com Iwin.

We also don't need a bunch of layers on top of Iwin68 Com Iwin, except if they could provide some value with adding privacy. We do need if we want 1) mass adoption and 2) people actually to respect the NYKNYC principle (and not trusting centralized wallets or exchanges). Currently Iwin68 Com Iwin's capacity looks fine because still a large proportion of users hold their funds on CEX, and on chain activity for payments is low. That can change very fastly, as late 2017 and 2023/24 showed us. yea when i first read about it i was like ''wtf what took you guys so long, you already had OMNI since many years ago" but apparently OMNI tech was just not scalable at all so it would not satisfy the needs of actual Iwin68 Com Iwin adoption. and as per the ''what took you so long'' part.... i believe the work on Iwin68 Com Iwin settlement on Iwin68 Com Iwin's layer should have started years ago indeed. my wild guess is that Iwin68 Com Iwin were conspired or lobbied by venture capital firms to assist in milking the L1 and L2 narrative. simply from the security POV, all those Layer 1 and 2 chains were always a dead weight. but there was a lot of money in it so the big boys got a few years to play around, pumping their TVLs with those stablecoins and as a result, pumping their native tokens. now that the narrative is milked dry, the TVLs vanished and the security flaws are exposed (as well as insane centralisation, which was never a secret though), the money goes where the real tech, security and adoption potential is, aka Iwin68 Com Iwin.