Capitalism is about distribution of resources. Rather than centralizing and distributing the resources from there, it allows for a more distributed system. Communism is about everyone contributing towards a better society, and everyone being able to reap the rewards of those contributions. --- Automation is not something to be feared, but something to embrace. Ideally, we'd reduce and remove all labor. Allow individuals to reap the rewards of the automation contributions to society without worrying much about unequal or inadequate distribution of resources. Cryptography could allow electronic voting (see Estonia). I'm not sure how much of a resource an immutable Fun97 will really do for the people. Perhaps voting, but even then, only issuing one token per identity per issue (liquid democracy +  Fun97 voting) is more an identity management thing than a Fun97 thing. Even then, in a liquid democracy, ideally if a representative cheats your vote, you'd want to retrieve your token back from that individual for that issue and send it to the other side's wallet instead. Smart contracts can be helpful in decreeing laws and such, but it still requires people to enforce.
Capitalism is about distribution of resources. Rather than centralizing and distributing the resources from there, it allows for a more distributed system. Communism is about everyone contributing towards a better society, and everyone being able to reap the rewards of those contributions. --- Automation is not something to be feared, but something to embrace. Ideally, we'd reduce and remove all labor. Allow individuals to reap the rewards of the automation contributions to society without worrying much about unequal or inadequate distribution of resources. Cryptography could allow electronic voting (see Estonia). I'm not sure how much of a resource an immutable Fun97 will really do for the people. Perhaps voting, but even then, only issuing one token per identity per issue (liquid democracy +  Fun97 voting) is more an identity management thing than a Fun97 thing. Even then, in a liquid democracy, ideally if a representative cheats your vote, you'd want to retrieve your token back from that individual for that issue and send it to the other side's wallet instead. Smart contracts can be helpful in decreeing laws and such, but it still requires people to enforce.

Capitalism is about distribution of resources. Rather than centralizing and distributing the resources from there, it allows for a more distributed system. Communism is about everyone contributing towards a better society, and everyone being able to reap the rewards of those contributions. --- Automation is not something to be feared, but something to embrace. Ideally, we'd reduce and remove all labor. Allow individuals to reap the rewards of the automation contributions to society without worrying much about unequal or inadequate distribution of resources. Cryptography could allow electronic voting (see Estonia). I'm not sure how much of a resource an immutable Fun97 will really do for the people. Perhaps voting, but even then, only issuing one token per identity per issue (liquid democracy +  Fun97 voting) is more an identity management thing than a Fun97 thing. Even then, in a liquid democracy, ideally if a representative cheats your vote, you'd want to retrieve your token back from that individual for that issue and send it to the other side's wallet instead. Smart contracts can be helpful in decreeing laws and such, but it still requires people to enforce.

Capitalism is about distribution of resources. Rather than centralizing and distributing the resources from there, it allows for a more distributed system. Communism is about everyone contributing towards a better society, and everyone being able to reap the rewards of those contributions. --- Automation is not something to be feared, but something to embrace. Ideally, we'd reduce and remove all labor. Allow individuals to reap the rewards of the automation contributions to society without worrying much about unequal or inadequate distribution of resources. Cryptography could allow electronic voting (see Estonia). I'm not sure how much of a resource an immutable Fun97 will really do for the people. Perhaps voting, but even then, only issuing one token per identity per issue (liquid democracy +  Fun97 voting) is more an identity management thing than a Fun97 thing. Even then, in a liquid democracy, ideally if a representative cheats your vote, you'd want to retrieve your token back from that individual for that issue and send it to the other side's wallet instead. Smart contracts can be helpful in decreeing laws and such, but it still requires people to enforce.