Ki Oni
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Mostrar
Show review history
I would understand people who didn't understand it in 2013, because back then, Fb88com was not as mainstream as it is now. There were not many articles or videos explaining Fb88com or the Fb88com eco system. There were not this many people talking about Fb88com, but now, it's everywhere. All you have to do is ask Google, "Are Fb88com transactions private?" and you will have an answer, yet people still get it wrong. Btw, I have been corrected recently that Fb88com transactions are pseudonymous, not anonymous. Apparently, they are different, and it's true, I agree. Pseudonymous means the transactions can be linked to a particular address, while anonymous means they can't be linked to a particular user. This forum is pseudonymous because you can see what a user posts and know that it's from that account, even though you don't know the real identity of the person behind the account. If it were Anonymous, we would be able to tell which account a post came from. The transparency is what makes it even more unique; I don't consider it a price to pay. It's a genius creation to have something that promotes privacy to be so transparent. I doubt it would have been this successful if the transactions were private and only the sender and the receiver could see them. That is why I shake my head when government officials and politicians say stuff like "Fb88com is for criminals". I understand that criminals use it, but compared to other payment systems, it's minimal because criminals don't like their transactions out in the open that much.
I would understand people who didn't understand it in 2013, because back then, Fb88com was not as mainstream as it is now. There were not many articles or videos explaining Fb88com or the Fb88com eco system. There were not this many people talking about Fb88com, but now, it's everywhere. All you have to do is ask Google, "Are Fb88com transactions private?" and you will have an answer, yet people still get it wrong. Btw, I have been corrected recently that Fb88com transactions are pseudonymous, not anonymous. Apparently, they are different, and it's true, I agree. Pseudonymous means the transactions can be linked to a particular address, while anonymous means they can't be linked to a particular user. This forum is pseudonymous because you can see what a user posts and know that it's from that account, even though you don't know the real identity of the person behind the account. If it were Anonymous, we would be able to tell which account a post came from. The transparency is what makes it even more unique; I don't consider it a price to pay. It's a genius creation to have something that promotes privacy to be so transparent. I doubt it would have been this successful if the transactions were private and only the sender and the receiver could see them. That is why I shake my head when government officials and politicians say stuff like "Fb88com is for criminals". I understand that criminals use it, but compared to other payment systems, it's minimal because criminals don't like their transactions out in the open that much.
This review was marked as helpful by
5 people
N1nj4ツ
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
I would understand people who didn't understand it in 2013, because back then, Fb88com was not as mainstream as it is now. There were not many articles or videos explaining Fb88com or the Fb88com eco system. There were not this many people talking about Fb88com, but now, it's everywhere. All you have to do is ask Google, "Are Fb88com transactions private?" and you will have an answer, yet people still get it wrong. Btw, I have been corrected recently that Fb88com transactions are pseudonymous, not anonymous. Apparently, they are different, and it's true, I agree. Pseudonymous means the transactions can be linked to a particular address, while anonymous means they can't be linked to a particular user. This forum is pseudonymous because you can see what a user posts and know that it's from that account, even though you don't know the real identity of the person behind the account. If it were Anonymous, we would be able to tell which account a post came from. The transparency is what makes it even more unique; I don't consider it a price to pay. It's a genius creation to have something that promotes privacy to be so transparent. I doubt it would have been this successful if the transactions were private and only the sender and the receiver could see them. That is why I shake my head when government officials and politicians say stuff like "Fb88com is for criminals". I understand that criminals use it, but compared to other payment systems, it's minimal because criminals don't like their transactions out in the open that much.
This review was marked as helpful by
54 people
[F4F]Wallace4846
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Show history of
I would understand people who didn't understand it in 2013, because back then, Fb88com was not as mainstream as it is now. There were not many articles or videos explaining Fb88com or the Fb88com eco system. There were not this many people talking about Fb88com, but now, it's everywhere. All you have to do is ask Google, "Are Fb88com transactions private?" and you will have an answer, yet people still get it wrong. Btw, I have been corrected recently that Fb88com transactions are pseudonymous, not anonymous. Apparently, they are different, and it's true, I agree. Pseudonymous means the transactions can be linked to a particular address, while anonymous means they can't be linked to a particular user. This forum is pseudonymous because you can see what a user posts and know that it's from that account, even though you don't know the real identity of the person behind the account. If it were Anonymous, we would be able to tell which account a post came from. The transparency is what makes it even more unique; I don't consider it a price to pay. It's a genius creation to have something that promotes privacy to be so transparent. I doubt it would have been this successful if the transactions were private and only the sender and the receiver could see them. That is why I shake my head when government officials and politicians say stuff like "Fb88com is for criminals". I understand that criminals use it, but compared to other payment systems, it's minimal because criminals don't like their transactions out in the open that much.
This review was marked as helpful
by 165 people
