I am wondering if government workers should be worried as well? Do you think the government can sack workers to save cost, when they know that by doing so they are increasing the unemployment rate? It's quite unfortunate that the government job employment structures has also been sentimental where those officials at top or high authoritative positions considers the influence of their officiating power as a strategic opportunity to meet their personal interests in the alliance of the political structures which gives individuals in the government sectors the ability to control or oversee the public affairs. Regarded that human in the position to make decisions for other will always be threatening to others because when you're answerable to an office, you're vulnerable to end your contract whether it's a employment sector or private. The vulnerability involved in employment be it in the private or public sector is very real, that's why even those who have government jobs find other sources of income and can easily fuse it to accommodate their time, but those who work in the more private sector find it hard due to their time constraint and over engagement of full time in a private job that requires strict adherence to company policies and HR demands. I prefer the government jobs though, but when it comes to job loss, those in the private sector suffer it more while there may even be ghost workers in the government jobs, earning or on payroll without even being present at work.
I am wondering if government workers should be worried as well? Do you think the government can sack workers to save cost, when they know that by doing so they are increasing the unemployment rate? It's quite unfortunate that the government job employment structures has also been sentimental where those officials at top or high authoritative positions considers the influence of their officiating power as a strategic opportunity to meet their personal interests in the alliance of the political structures which gives individuals in the government sectors the ability to control or oversee the public affairs. Regarded that human in the position to make decisions for other will always be threatening to others because when you're answerable to an office, you're vulnerable to end your contract whether it's a employment sector or private. The vulnerability involved in employment be it in the private or public sector is very real, that's why even those who have government jobs find other sources of income and can easily fuse it to accommodate their time, but those who work in the more private sector find it hard due to their time constraint and over engagement of full time in a private job that requires strict adherence to company policies and HR demands. I prefer the government jobs though, but when it comes to job loss, those in the private sector suffer it more while there may even be ghost workers in the government jobs, earning or on payroll without even being present at work.

I am wondering if government workers should be worried as well? Do you think the government can sack workers to save cost, when they know that by doing so they are increasing the unemployment rate? It's quite unfortunate that the government job employment structures has also been sentimental where those officials at top or high authoritative positions considers the influence of their officiating power as a strategic opportunity to meet their personal interests in the alliance of the political structures which gives individuals in the government sectors the ability to control or oversee the public affairs. Regarded that human in the position to make decisions for other will always be threatening to others because when you're answerable to an office, you're vulnerable to end your contract whether it's a employment sector or private. The vulnerability involved in employment be it in the private or public sector is very real, that's why even those who have government jobs find other sources of income and can easily fuse it to accommodate their time, but those who work in the more private sector find it hard due to their time constraint and over engagement of full time in a private job that requires strict adherence to company policies and HR demands. I prefer the government jobs though, but when it comes to job loss, those in the private sector suffer it more while there may even be ghost workers in the government jobs, earning or on payroll without even being present at work.

I am wondering if government workers should be worried as well? Do you think the government can sack workers to save cost, when they know that by doing so they are increasing the unemployment rate? It's quite unfortunate that the government job employment structures has also been sentimental where those officials at top or high authoritative positions considers the influence of their officiating power as a strategic opportunity to meet their personal interests in the alliance of the political structures which gives individuals in the government sectors the ability to control or oversee the public affairs. Regarded that human in the position to make decisions for other will always be threatening to others because when you're answerable to an office, you're vulnerable to end your contract whether it's a employment sector or private. The vulnerability involved in employment be it in the private or public sector is very real, that's why even those who have government jobs find other sources of income and can easily fuse it to accommodate their time, but those who work in the more private sector find it hard due to their time constraint and over engagement of full time in a private job that requires strict adherence to company policies and HR demands. I prefer the government jobs though, but when it comes to job loss, those in the private sector suffer it more while there may even be ghost workers in the government jobs, earning or on payroll without even being present at work.