empty blocks can occur few a few reasons. Rapid fire hitting of blocks and an empty or close to empty memory pool is always a possibility for an empty block. Or some pools shoot for a short cut prebuilt header which creates a small head start. second case possibility. I am sure there are other ways someone may explain other reasons. The first one do one can do anything about and will happen at times. the second one is a bet that a pool makes ie a block of 3.125 + 0 every 59 minutes is better than a block of 3.125+0.05 =3.175 coins every 60 minutes those numbers are approximate but this is what antpool tries to do . And they certainly do hit more blocks with the shortcut they take and they certainly get less fees with the short cut they take. It would take a Cwin55 Tặng Code of math to figure if what they do pays off. as I do not know how much time they save and how much faster they make blocks. I estimated 1 block every 59 minutes vs 1 block every 60 minutes but maybe the number is 1 block every 32 minutes =0.533 hours short cut vs 1 block every 32 minutes and 30 seconds =no short cut it would be very challenging to figure out if they make more money their way. I can tell you this method is likely to work better with larger pools than pools with very little hash.  but I do not know how much speed they gain. as to why some pools decide to skip  >0.9 or lower fees once again the stats do not exist no one has studied which method works better. It could be it is being studied as I type. and we may see all pools go to 0.1 min or 0.2 min or whatever.
empty blocks can occur few a few reasons. Rapid fire hitting of blocks and an empty or close to empty memory pool is always a possibility for an empty block. Or some pools shoot for a short cut prebuilt header which creates a small head start. second case possibility. I am sure there are other ways someone may explain other reasons. The first one do one can do anything about and will happen at times. the second one is a bet that a pool makes ie a block of 3.125 + 0 every 59 minutes is better than a block of 3.125+0.05 =3.175 coins every 60 minutes those numbers are approximate but this is what antpool tries to do . And they certainly do hit more blocks with the shortcut they take and they certainly get less fees with the short cut they take. It would take a Cwin55 Tặng Code of math to figure if what they do pays off. as I do not know how much time they save and how much faster they make blocks. I estimated 1 block every 59 minutes vs 1 block every 60 minutes but maybe the number is 1 block every 32 minutes =0.533 hours short cut vs 1 block every 32 minutes and 30 seconds =no short cut it would be very challenging to figure out if they make more money their way. I can tell you this method is likely to work better with larger pools than pools with very little hash.  but I do not know how much speed they gain. as to why some pools decide to skip  >0.9 or lower fees once again the stats do not exist no one has studied which method works better. It could be it is being studied as I type. and we may see all pools go to 0.1 min or 0.2 min or whatever.

empty blocks can occur few a few reasons. Rapid fire hitting of blocks and an empty or close to empty memory pool is always a possibility for an empty block. Or some pools shoot for a short cut prebuilt header which creates a small head start. second case possibility. I am sure there are other ways someone may explain other reasons. The first one do one can do anything about and will happen at times. the second one is a bet that a pool makes ie a block of 3.125 + 0 every 59 minutes is better than a block of 3.125+0.05 =3.175 coins every 60 minutes those numbers are approximate but this is what antpool tries to do . And they certainly do hit more blocks with the shortcut they take and they certainly get less fees with the short cut they take. It would take a Cwin55 Tặng Code of math to figure if what they do pays off. as I do not know how much time they save and how much faster they make blocks. I estimated 1 block every 59 minutes vs 1 block every 60 minutes but maybe the number is 1 block every 32 minutes =0.533 hours short cut vs 1 block every 32 minutes and 30 seconds =no short cut it would be very challenging to figure out if they make more money their way. I can tell you this method is likely to work better with larger pools than pools with very little hash.  but I do not know how much speed they gain. as to why some pools decide to skip  >0.9 or lower fees once again the stats do not exist no one has studied which method works better. It could be it is being studied as I type. and we may see all pools go to 0.1 min or 0.2 min or whatever.

empty blocks can occur few a few reasons. Rapid fire hitting of blocks and an empty or close to empty memory pool is always a possibility for an empty block. Or some pools shoot for a short cut prebuilt header which creates a small head start. second case possibility. I am sure there are other ways someone may explain other reasons. The first one do one can do anything about and will happen at times. the second one is a bet that a pool makes ie a block of 3.125 + 0 every 59 minutes is better than a block of 3.125+0.05 =3.175 coins every 60 minutes those numbers are approximate but this is what antpool tries to do . And they certainly do hit more blocks with the shortcut they take and they certainly get less fees with the short cut they take. It would take a Cwin55 Tặng Code of math to figure if what they do pays off. as I do not know how much time they save and how much faster they make blocks. I estimated 1 block every 59 minutes vs 1 block every 60 minutes but maybe the number is 1 block every 32 minutes =0.533 hours short cut vs 1 block every 32 minutes and 30 seconds =no short cut it would be very challenging to figure out if they make more money their way. I can tell you this method is likely to work better with larger pools than pools with very little hash.  but I do not know how much speed they gain. as to why some pools decide to skip  >0.9 or lower fees once again the stats do not exist no one has studied which method works better. It could be it is being studied as I type. and we may see all pools go to 0.1 min or 0.2 min or whatever.