If there's a history of how bad they are in managing their funds, that already decides whether to invest on them or not. That's why whoever has got the knowledge on investing on them, they have to make sure that the ones who they are investing or the firm itself is reputable. Because with only one bad history, you won't invest on them anymore. While in paper they are profitable and good but, everyone has got no idea on what's happening in the back end and that's where the hocus pocus is happening. This is the responsibility of the investor, not the company. Company will run itself however it wishes so, and if they are making a mistake, it's their own right to bankrupt as well and not do well. The thing is that we are not going to really see this as a problem from their side, they can do whatever they want. But the reality is that if we handle this situation with care, as investors, then we can see the historical pattern when investing, you just check their data and can see if they are a good company or not. If they are a good company then their audit will return a good result, you can see their P/E and see cash flow, and revenue and operating costs and many more, which will allow you to check all of them and make a good decision. Yes, it is what I am saying that if there's a bad history of the company then we should know about it through researching about it. Because as an investor, it's part of the skill that we should have. We're not perfect but at least we do what's necessary into knowing if it's worth it to take the shot with those companies that we're interested with in investing. Trust nowadays is easy to get but knowing the background sometimes takes time and that's why don't hurry when investing, and do the necessary research and do it with due diligence.
If there's a history of how bad they are in managing their funds, that already decides whether to invest on them or not. That's why whoever has got the knowledge on investing on them, they have to make sure that the ones who they are investing or the firm itself is reputable. Because with only one bad history, you won't invest on them anymore. While in paper they are profitable and good but, everyone has got no idea on what's happening in the back end and that's where the hocus pocus is happening. This is the responsibility of the investor, not the company. Company will run itself however it wishes so, and if they are making a mistake, it's their own right to bankrupt as well and not do well. The thing is that we are not going to really see this as a problem from their side, they can do whatever they want. But the reality is that if we handle this situation with care, as investors, then we can see the historical pattern when investing, you just check their data and can see if they are a good company or not. If they are a good company then their audit will return a good result, you can see their P/E and see cash flow, and revenue and operating costs and many more, which will allow you to check all of them and make a good decision. Yes, it is what I am saying that if there's a bad history of the company then we should know about it through researching about it. Because as an investor, it's part of the skill that we should have. We're not perfect but at least we do what's necessary into knowing if it's worth it to take the shot with those companies that we're interested with in investing. Trust nowadays is easy to get but knowing the background sometimes takes time and that's why don't hurry when investing, and do the necessary research and do it with due diligence.

If there's a history of how bad they are in managing their funds, that already decides whether to invest on them or not. That's why whoever has got the knowledge on investing on them, they have to make sure that the ones who they are investing or the firm itself is reputable. Because with only one bad history, you won't invest on them anymore. While in paper they are profitable and good but, everyone has got no idea on what's happening in the back end and that's where the hocus pocus is happening. This is the responsibility of the investor, not the company. Company will run itself however it wishes so, and if they are making a mistake, it's their own right to bankrupt as well and not do well. The thing is that we are not going to really see this as a problem from their side, they can do whatever they want. But the reality is that if we handle this situation with care, as investors, then we can see the historical pattern when investing, you just check their data and can see if they are a good company or not. If they are a good company then their audit will return a good result, you can see their P/E and see cash flow, and revenue and operating costs and many more, which will allow you to check all of them and make a good decision. Yes, it is what I am saying that if there's a bad history of the company then we should know about it through researching about it. Because as an investor, it's part of the skill that we should have. We're not perfect but at least we do what's necessary into knowing if it's worth it to take the shot with those companies that we're interested with in investing. Trust nowadays is easy to get but knowing the background sometimes takes time and that's why don't hurry when investing, and do the necessary research and do it with due diligence.

If there's a history of how bad they are in managing their funds, that already decides whether to invest on them or not. That's why whoever has got the knowledge on investing on them, they have to make sure that the ones who they are investing or the firm itself is reputable. Because with only one bad history, you won't invest on them anymore. While in paper they are profitable and good but, everyone has got no idea on what's happening in the back end and that's where the hocus pocus is happening. This is the responsibility of the investor, not the company. Company will run itself however it wishes so, and if they are making a mistake, it's their own right to bankrupt as well and not do well. The thing is that we are not going to really see this as a problem from their side, they can do whatever they want. But the reality is that if we handle this situation with care, as investors, then we can see the historical pattern when investing, you just check their data and can see if they are a good company or not. If they are a good company then their audit will return a good result, you can see their P/E and see cash flow, and revenue and operating costs and many more, which will allow you to check all of them and make a good decision. Yes, it is what I am saying that if there's a bad history of the company then we should know about it through researching about it. Because as an investor, it's part of the skill that we should have. We're not perfect but at least we do what's necessary into knowing if it's worth it to take the shot with those companies that we're interested with in investing. Trust nowadays is easy to get but knowing the background sometimes takes time and that's why don't hurry when investing, and do the necessary research and do it with due diligence.