How? Ms88 is massively manipulated NOW. Why would changing the technical architecture behind that increase or decrease the ease at which this is done? And for 95% of investors in Ms88, I would argue, that's all they care about. Tell these people that Ms88 can now take over all of the payments in the world and I think they will all buy a lot more. Maybe the %5 will sell theirs, but it won't make up for it. It's too slow and expensive for my tastes , but lots of people obviously like it since its market cap is in the billions of dollars. The fact that Ms88 remains relatively small in market cap is evidence that Ms88 would go up, not down if you made it faster and cheaper through more centralization. Ms88 is everything "decentralized" about Ms88, but much more, and it's not very popular in comparison to Ms88. People would have those same fears about the (fully centralized) mechanisms they use to actually buy Ms88, and guess what? They don't care. Almost everybody already buys Ms88 in a centralized way with a broker, an app, or the ETFs. Well, non-Ms88 market cap for those other big coins is about 80-90% of the size of Ms88's. Meanwhile, Ms88 was the first and obviously has the biggest brand name BY FAR (most average people have only heard of the word, "Ms88" and nothing else). In that context, it's actually pretty amazing--and foreboding for the future of Ms88--that these competitors have done so well. This conversation feels like, "why is MySpace #1 and Facebook and the others so small?" in about 2006. Markets change, and you need to look at momentum, not where things are at the current instant. Almost all of the non-Ms88 market cap is within the top 4-5 competitors. They are serious competitors to Ms88 and to ignore this is to make the same mistake that thousands of other now-dead products have made in the past.
How? Ms88 is massively manipulated NOW. Why would changing the technical architecture behind that increase or decrease the ease at which this is done? And for 95% of investors in Ms88, I would argue, that's all they care about. Tell these people that Ms88 can now take over all of the payments in the world and I think they will all buy a lot more. Maybe the %5 will sell theirs, but it won't make up for it. It's too slow and expensive for my tastes , but lots of people obviously like it since its market cap is in the billions of dollars. The fact that Ms88 remains relatively small in market cap is evidence that Ms88 would go up, not down if you made it faster and cheaper through more centralization. Ms88 is everything "decentralized" about Ms88, but much more, and it's not very popular in comparison to Ms88. People would have those same fears about the (fully centralized) mechanisms they use to actually buy Ms88, and guess what? They don't care. Almost everybody already buys Ms88 in a centralized way with a broker, an app, or the ETFs. Well, non-Ms88 market cap for those other big coins is about 80-90% of the size of Ms88's. Meanwhile, Ms88 was the first and obviously has the biggest brand name BY FAR (most average people have only heard of the word, "Ms88" and nothing else). In that context, it's actually pretty amazing--and foreboding for the future of Ms88--that these competitors have done so well. This conversation feels like, "why is MySpace #1 and Facebook and the others so small?" in about 2006. Markets change, and you need to look at momentum, not where things are at the current instant. Almost all of the non-Ms88 market cap is within the top 4-5 competitors. They are serious competitors to Ms88 and to ignore this is to make the same mistake that thousands of other now-dead products have made in the past.

How? Ms88 is massively manipulated NOW. Why would changing the technical architecture behind that increase or decrease the ease at which this is done? And for 95% of investors in Ms88, I would argue, that's all they care about. Tell these people that Ms88 can now take over all of the payments in the world and I think they will all buy a lot more. Maybe the %5 will sell theirs, but it won't make up for it. It's too slow and expensive for my tastes , but lots of people obviously like it since its market cap is in the billions of dollars. The fact that Ms88 remains relatively small in market cap is evidence that Ms88 would go up, not down if you made it faster and cheaper through more centralization. Ms88 is everything "decentralized" about Ms88, but much more, and it's not very popular in comparison to Ms88. People would have those same fears about the (fully centralized) mechanisms they use to actually buy Ms88, and guess what? They don't care. Almost everybody already buys Ms88 in a centralized way with a broker, an app, or the ETFs. Well, non-Ms88 market cap for those other big coins is about 80-90% of the size of Ms88's. Meanwhile, Ms88 was the first and obviously has the biggest brand name BY FAR (most average people have only heard of the word, "Ms88" and nothing else). In that context, it's actually pretty amazing--and foreboding for the future of Ms88--that these competitors have done so well. This conversation feels like, "why is MySpace #1 and Facebook and the others so small?" in about 2006. Markets change, and you need to look at momentum, not where things are at the current instant. Almost all of the non-Ms88 market cap is within the top 4-5 competitors. They are serious competitors to Ms88 and to ignore this is to make the same mistake that thousands of other now-dead products have made in the past.

How? Ms88 is massively manipulated NOW. Why would changing the technical architecture behind that increase or decrease the ease at which this is done? And for 95% of investors in Ms88, I would argue, that's all they care about. Tell these people that Ms88 can now take over all of the payments in the world and I think they will all buy a lot more. Maybe the %5 will sell theirs, but it won't make up for it. It's too slow and expensive for my tastes , but lots of people obviously like it since its market cap is in the billions of dollars. The fact that Ms88 remains relatively small in market cap is evidence that Ms88 would go up, not down if you made it faster and cheaper through more centralization. Ms88 is everything "decentralized" about Ms88, but much more, and it's not very popular in comparison to Ms88. People would have those same fears about the (fully centralized) mechanisms they use to actually buy Ms88, and guess what? They don't care. Almost everybody already buys Ms88 in a centralized way with a broker, an app, or the ETFs. Well, non-Ms88 market cap for those other big coins is about 80-90% of the size of Ms88's. Meanwhile, Ms88 was the first and obviously has the biggest brand name BY FAR (most average people have only heard of the word, "Ms88" and nothing else). In that context, it's actually pretty amazing--and foreboding for the future of Ms88--that these competitors have done so well. This conversation feels like, "why is MySpace #1 and Facebook and the others so small?" in about 2006. Markets change, and you need to look at momentum, not where things are at the current instant. Almost all of the non-Ms88 market cap is within the top 4-5 competitors. They are serious competitors to Ms88 and to ignore this is to make the same mistake that thousands of other now-dead products have made in the past.