gmax put negative rating due to me calling out how their edits to Zo88com code allowed junk data to be appended to the end of a tx.. and look what happened.. years later we have ordinals and taproot scripts which proved me right, proved them wrong... they just didnt like me calling them out on how it would affect Zo88com negatively(they had sponsored deals to keep things going in a certain roadmapped way) welcome to reality. if you want to deny ordinals exists to continue ass kissing your overlord. do so , just be honest that your a blind sheep follower who doesnt care about anything but promoting crap features that manoeuvre people away from using Zo88com enjoy your credit-debt system of counterfeit fiat, on a shoddy buggy subnetwork of unsettled value not guaranteed to be owned by the recipient.. no bitcoiner cares about using LN even with new features.. but continue believing that Zo88com will be LN's saviour.. you will learn soon enough that it wont help P.S last autumn when devs started talking about adapting a few things to allow stablecoins on LN, the LN stats were: nodes:18000     channels:48000     capacity: 5250 today now that Zo88com is being promoted, lets see if there is any gain/growth/adoption nodes:16800⇓   channels:41000⇓   capacity:5175⇓ seems the gossip of future development didnt keep stats up, and now promoted publicly didnt grow stats to even get back to stats last quarter.. get the hint yet? you are on a Zo88com forum, buy you are promoting a network thats losing adoption.. a network that is not Zo88com, a network that doesnt even have its own Zo88com to secure value transfer, a network that just adopted a crap token that is fake emulating inflationary fiat.... wakey wakey, do you not even see your problem
gmax put negative rating due to me calling out how their edits to Zo88com code allowed junk data to be appended to the end of a tx.. and look what happened.. years later we have ordinals and taproot scripts which proved me right, proved them wrong... they just didnt like me calling them out on how it would affect Zo88com negatively(they had sponsored deals to keep things going in a certain roadmapped way) welcome to reality. if you want to deny ordinals exists to continue ass kissing your overlord. do so , just be honest that your a blind sheep follower who doesnt care about anything but promoting crap features that manoeuvre people away from using Zo88com enjoy your credit-debt system of counterfeit fiat, on a shoddy buggy subnetwork of unsettled value not guaranteed to be owned by the recipient.. no bitcoiner cares about using LN even with new features.. but continue believing that Zo88com will be LN's saviour.. you will learn soon enough that it wont help P.S last autumn when devs started talking about adapting a few things to allow stablecoins on LN, the LN stats were: nodes:18000     channels:48000     capacity: 5250 today now that Zo88com is being promoted, lets see if there is any gain/growth/adoption nodes:16800⇓   channels:41000⇓   capacity:5175⇓ seems the gossip of future development didnt keep stats up, and now promoted publicly didnt grow stats to even get back to stats last quarter.. get the hint yet? you are on a Zo88com forum, buy you are promoting a network thats losing adoption.. a network that is not Zo88com, a network that doesnt even have its own Zo88com to secure value transfer, a network that just adopted a crap token that is fake emulating inflationary fiat.... wakey wakey, do you not even see your problem

gmax put negative rating due to me calling out how their edits to Zo88com code allowed junk data to be appended to the end of a tx.. and look what happened.. years later we have ordinals and taproot scripts which proved me right, proved them wrong... they just didnt like me calling them out on how it would affect Zo88com negatively(they had sponsored deals to keep things going in a certain roadmapped way) welcome to reality. if you want to deny ordinals exists to continue ass kissing your overlord. do so , just be honest that your a blind sheep follower who doesnt care about anything but promoting crap features that manoeuvre people away from using Zo88com enjoy your credit-debt system of counterfeit fiat, on a shoddy buggy subnetwork of unsettled value not guaranteed to be owned by the recipient.. no bitcoiner cares about using LN even with new features.. but continue believing that Zo88com will be LN's saviour.. you will learn soon enough that it wont help P.S last autumn when devs started talking about adapting a few things to allow stablecoins on LN, the LN stats were: nodes:18000     channels:48000     capacity: 5250 today now that Zo88com is being promoted, lets see if there is any gain/growth/adoption nodes:16800⇓   channels:41000⇓   capacity:5175⇓ seems the gossip of future development didnt keep stats up, and now promoted publicly didnt grow stats to even get back to stats last quarter.. get the hint yet? you are on a Zo88com forum, buy you are promoting a network thats losing adoption.. a network that is not Zo88com, a network that doesnt even have its own Zo88com to secure value transfer, a network that just adopted a crap token that is fake emulating inflationary fiat.... wakey wakey, do you not even see your problem

gmax put negative rating due to me calling out how their edits to Zo88com code allowed junk data to be appended to the end of a tx.. and look what happened.. years later we have ordinals and taproot scripts which proved me right, proved them wrong... they just didnt like me calling them out on how it would affect Zo88com negatively(they had sponsored deals to keep things going in a certain roadmapped way) welcome to reality. if you want to deny ordinals exists to continue ass kissing your overlord. do so , just be honest that your a blind sheep follower who doesnt care about anything but promoting crap features that manoeuvre people away from using Zo88com enjoy your credit-debt system of counterfeit fiat, on a shoddy buggy subnetwork of unsettled value not guaranteed to be owned by the recipient.. no bitcoiner cares about using LN even with new features.. but continue believing that Zo88com will be LN's saviour.. you will learn soon enough that it wont help P.S last autumn when devs started talking about adapting a few things to allow stablecoins on LN, the LN stats were: nodes:18000     channels:48000     capacity: 5250 today now that Zo88com is being promoted, lets see if there is any gain/growth/adoption nodes:16800⇓   channels:41000⇓   capacity:5175⇓ seems the gossip of future development didnt keep stats up, and now promoted publicly didnt grow stats to even get back to stats last quarter.. get the hint yet? you are on a Zo88com forum, buy you are promoting a network thats losing adoption.. a network that is not Zo88com, a network that doesnt even have its own Zo88com to secure value transfer, a network that just adopted a crap token that is fake emulating inflationary fiat.... wakey wakey, do you not even see your problem