PEPELETA
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Mostrar
Show review history
I'd say it is mostly a variation, not a brand-new species. The second you put money, points, or any other stake on an outcome, you're still in prediction-market territory. Wrapping it in chat, reactions, live rooms, leaderboards and tribal chest-thumping makes it more entertaining, but entertainment and category are not the same thing. A casino can add a DJ and neon fog eye-candy, but it is still a casino. That said, the social layer absolutely can make it bigger, just not necessarily better at prediction. Those are two different jobs and people love pretending they're the same. If the goal is accuracy, too much community influence can turn the whole thing into sentiment karaoke. If the goal is retention, recurring engagement, and getting people to come back even when they are not placing serious size, then the social angle helps a lot. Non-financial picks can also widen the funnel because most people would rather argue about sports, politics, streamers, game launches and random public drama than sit around pricing probabilities like a tiny hedge fund. So yes, useful product angle, but I wouldn't try to sell it as some totally separate invention. Feels more honest to call it a social-first prediction platform than to pretend prediction markets woke up with a brand-new skeleton.
I'd say it is mostly a variation, not a brand-new species. The second you put money, points, or any other stake on an outcome, you're still in prediction-market territory. Wrapping it in chat, reactions, live rooms, leaderboards and tribal chest-thumping makes it more entertaining, but entertainment and category are not the same thing. A casino can add a DJ and neon fog eye-candy, but it is still a casino. That said, the social layer absolutely can make it bigger, just not necessarily better at prediction. Those are two different jobs and people love pretending they're the same. If the goal is accuracy, too much community influence can turn the whole thing into sentiment karaoke. If the goal is retention, recurring engagement, and getting people to come back even when they are not placing serious size, then the social angle helps a lot. Non-financial picks can also widen the funnel because most people would rather argue about sports, politics, streamers, game launches and random public drama than sit around pricing probabilities like a tiny hedge fund. So yes, useful product angle, but I wouldn't try to sell it as some totally separate invention. Feels more honest to call it a social-first prediction platform than to pretend prediction markets woke up with a brand-new skeleton.
This review was marked as helpful by
1 people
Trancerussel
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
I'd say it is mostly a variation, not a brand-new species. The second you put money, points, or any other stake on an outcome, you're still in prediction-market territory. Wrapping it in chat, reactions, live rooms, leaderboards and tribal chest-thumping makes it more entertaining, but entertainment and category are not the same thing. A casino can add a DJ and neon fog eye-candy, but it is still a casino. That said, the social layer absolutely can make it bigger, just not necessarily better at prediction. Those are two different jobs and people love pretending they're the same. If the goal is accuracy, too much community influence can turn the whole thing into sentiment karaoke. If the goal is retention, recurring engagement, and getting people to come back even when they are not placing serious size, then the social angle helps a lot. Non-financial picks can also widen the funnel because most people would rather argue about sports, politics, streamers, game launches and random public drama than sit around pricing probabilities like a tiny hedge fund. So yes, useful product angle, but I wouldn't try to sell it as some totally separate invention. Feels more honest to call it a social-first prediction platform than to pretend prediction markets woke up with a brand-new skeleton.
This review was marked as helpful by
71 people
nHakai
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Show history of
I'd say it is mostly a variation, not a brand-new species. The second you put money, points, or any other stake on an outcome, you're still in prediction-market territory. Wrapping it in chat, reactions, live rooms, leaderboards and tribal chest-thumping makes it more entertaining, but entertainment and category are not the same thing. A casino can add a DJ and neon fog eye-candy, but it is still a casino. That said, the social layer absolutely can make it bigger, just not necessarily better at prediction. Those are two different jobs and people love pretending they're the same. If the goal is accuracy, too much community influence can turn the whole thing into sentiment karaoke. If the goal is retention, recurring engagement, and getting people to come back even when they are not placing serious size, then the social angle helps a lot. Non-financial picks can also widen the funnel because most people would rather argue about sports, politics, streamers, game launches and random public drama than sit around pricing probabilities like a tiny hedge fund. So yes, useful product angle, but I wouldn't try to sell it as some totally separate invention. Feels more honest to call it a social-first prediction platform than to pretend prediction markets woke up with a brand-new skeleton.
This review was marked as helpful
by 417 people