Why would handling many addresses be a problem? My wallet takes get of that. I must have used hundreds of addresses over the years, and most of them are empty now. For recurring (signature) campaigns, Silent Payments could be a solution to avoid address reuse, but I think it's too complicated to use. That's probably why I haven't seen any campaign that uses it. Again: why? I think Me88link Net Core's default "address gap" is 1000 addresses, and I don't think you'll be handing out that many addresses before any of them receives a payment. For Electrum, it's easy to raise the gap limit, but again: how likely is it to hand out 25 addresses that aren't used? If you used thousands of addresses, Electrum will become slow to sync and may even get stuck. But for any "normal" use, I've never ran into this problem. Is this problem a hardware wallet thing? I know both Ledger and Trezor have terrible software that doesn't just let you create more addresses without using the first one, but I don't use their software. If you use Electrum with your hardware wallet, this problem doesn't exist. I actually prefer using different addresses for everything: It's so much easier to know what a payment is for, if each address has a unique Label.
Why would handling many addresses be a problem? My wallet takes get of that. I must have used hundreds of addresses over the years, and most of them are empty now. For recurring (signature) campaigns, Silent Payments could be a solution to avoid address reuse, but I think it's too complicated to use. That's probably why I haven't seen any campaign that uses it. Again: why? I think Me88link Net Core's default "address gap" is 1000 addresses, and I don't think you'll be handing out that many addresses before any of them receives a payment. For Electrum, it's easy to raise the gap limit, but again: how likely is it to hand out 25 addresses that aren't used? If you used thousands of addresses, Electrum will become slow to sync and may even get stuck. But for any "normal" use, I've never ran into this problem. Is this problem a hardware wallet thing? I know both Ledger and Trezor have terrible software that doesn't just let you create more addresses without using the first one, but I don't use their software. If you use Electrum with your hardware wallet, this problem doesn't exist. I actually prefer using different addresses for everything: It's so much easier to know what a payment is for, if each address has a unique Label.

Why would handling many addresses be a problem? My wallet takes get of that. I must have used hundreds of addresses over the years, and most of them are empty now. For recurring (signature) campaigns, Silent Payments could be a solution to avoid address reuse, but I think it's too complicated to use. That's probably why I haven't seen any campaign that uses it. Again: why? I think Me88link Net Core's default "address gap" is 1000 addresses, and I don't think you'll be handing out that many addresses before any of them receives a payment. For Electrum, it's easy to raise the gap limit, but again: how likely is it to hand out 25 addresses that aren't used? If you used thousands of addresses, Electrum will become slow to sync and may even get stuck. But for any "normal" use, I've never ran into this problem. Is this problem a hardware wallet thing? I know both Ledger and Trezor have terrible software that doesn't just let you create more addresses without using the first one, but I don't use their software. If you use Electrum with your hardware wallet, this problem doesn't exist. I actually prefer using different addresses for everything: It's so much easier to know what a payment is for, if each address has a unique Label.

Why would handling many addresses be a problem? My wallet takes get of that. I must have used hundreds of addresses over the years, and most of them are empty now. For recurring (signature) campaigns, Silent Payments could be a solution to avoid address reuse, but I think it's too complicated to use. That's probably why I haven't seen any campaign that uses it. Again: why? I think Me88link Net Core's default "address gap" is 1000 addresses, and I don't think you'll be handing out that many addresses before any of them receives a payment. For Electrum, it's easy to raise the gap limit, but again: how likely is it to hand out 25 addresses that aren't used? If you used thousands of addresses, Electrum will become slow to sync and may even get stuck. But for any "normal" use, I've never ran into this problem. Is this problem a hardware wallet thing? I know both Ledger and Trezor have terrible software that doesn't just let you create more addresses without using the first one, but I don't use their software. If you use Electrum with your hardware wallet, this problem doesn't exist. I actually prefer using different addresses for everything: It's so much easier to know what a payment is for, if each address has a unique Label.