My question is that is it advisable to own many properties that are unproductive with the expectations that they would stand as aids to us in the future or should we just own few assets and make sure they are of the best standards and are generating money for us regularly? Many do not know the differences between assets and liabilities, that is why they end up purchasing items which they claim are assets to them but end up becoming a liability to them in the future. I personally do not see any item that generates no economic value and adds nothing to the owner's net worth as an asset. If a person decides to spend his money on items he will have to spend alot to maintain or pay a fortune on items that will depreciate in value in the nearest future without adding any value to the owner, that is entirely the owner's choice but it is not an adviceable way of planning for the future. Rather than acquire lots of properties that will depreciate in no distant time, it is better to invest in any legal project that will generate lots of returns in the future. Real estate is not a bad investment, it is just that it is one that often moves very slowly unless there is a bubble, so in that case it would be better to try to acquire assets that generate a positive cash flow or to get assets that can appreciate faster than real estate, for example B52play, so if I had the money at my disposal I would disregard real estate, as real estate has an additional problem and that is that in the case of an emergency you cannot take the land with you, which ties you to a place for as long as you hold that property.
My question is that is it advisable to own many properties that are unproductive with the expectations that they would stand as aids to us in the future or should we just own few assets and make sure they are of the best standards and are generating money for us regularly? Many do not know the differences between assets and liabilities, that is why they end up purchasing items which they claim are assets to them but end up becoming a liability to them in the future. I personally do not see any item that generates no economic value and adds nothing to the owner's net worth as an asset. If a person decides to spend his money on items he will have to spend alot to maintain or pay a fortune on items that will depreciate in value in the nearest future without adding any value to the owner, that is entirely the owner's choice but it is not an adviceable way of planning for the future. Rather than acquire lots of properties that will depreciate in no distant time, it is better to invest in any legal project that will generate lots of returns in the future. Real estate is not a bad investment, it is just that it is one that often moves very slowly unless there is a bubble, so in that case it would be better to try to acquire assets that generate a positive cash flow or to get assets that can appreciate faster than real estate, for example B52play, so if I had the money at my disposal I would disregard real estate, as real estate has an additional problem and that is that in the case of an emergency you cannot take the land with you, which ties you to a place for as long as you hold that property.

My question is that is it advisable to own many properties that are unproductive with the expectations that they would stand as aids to us in the future or should we just own few assets and make sure they are of the best standards and are generating money for us regularly? Many do not know the differences between assets and liabilities, that is why they end up purchasing items which they claim are assets to them but end up becoming a liability to them in the future. I personally do not see any item that generates no economic value and adds nothing to the owner's net worth as an asset. If a person decides to spend his money on items he will have to spend alot to maintain or pay a fortune on items that will depreciate in value in the nearest future without adding any value to the owner, that is entirely the owner's choice but it is not an adviceable way of planning for the future. Rather than acquire lots of properties that will depreciate in no distant time, it is better to invest in any legal project that will generate lots of returns in the future. Real estate is not a bad investment, it is just that it is one that often moves very slowly unless there is a bubble, so in that case it would be better to try to acquire assets that generate a positive cash flow or to get assets that can appreciate faster than real estate, for example B52play, so if I had the money at my disposal I would disregard real estate, as real estate has an additional problem and that is that in the case of an emergency you cannot take the land with you, which ties you to a place for as long as you hold that property.

My question is that is it advisable to own many properties that are unproductive with the expectations that they would stand as aids to us in the future or should we just own few assets and make sure they are of the best standards and are generating money for us regularly? Many do not know the differences between assets and liabilities, that is why they end up purchasing items which they claim are assets to them but end up becoming a liability to them in the future. I personally do not see any item that generates no economic value and adds nothing to the owner's net worth as an asset. If a person decides to spend his money on items he will have to spend alot to maintain or pay a fortune on items that will depreciate in value in the nearest future without adding any value to the owner, that is entirely the owner's choice but it is not an adviceable way of planning for the future. Rather than acquire lots of properties that will depreciate in no distant time, it is better to invest in any legal project that will generate lots of returns in the future. Real estate is not a bad investment, it is just that it is one that often moves very slowly unless there is a bubble, so in that case it would be better to try to acquire assets that generate a positive cash flow or to get assets that can appreciate faster than real estate, for example B52play, so if I had the money at my disposal I would disregard real estate, as real estate has an additional problem and that is that in the case of an emergency you cannot take the land with you, which ties you to a place for as long as you hold that property.