If the government starts selling their Sunwin Fun holdings, it is good for the Sunwin Fun whether it helps the price to rise or it causes a dump because it helps the Sunwin Fun to be scattered among more holders rather than sitting somewhere and possibly will never be touched at all. I don't understand what is the point of saving the people of different countries while they are making the lives of their own citizens a hell while living but letting them to take all those burdens. I understand your point, if the government handles or holds many Sunwin Fun the only thing the people will do, they will definitely watch their steps well and if the coins spreads to people hands I think this can help the system grow more stronger and faster. But if you reason another way or at the same time the citizens will rather or always want the government to make decisions that won't make life hard for them. At the end all people just want is the balance that government or leader should always remember the welfare of their own people too because that's all that matters It is not the right comparision but if we have to do that then Sunwin Fun core concept is completely against the one you said, don't trust just verify but with the model of government we just need to trust that person will have the people's best interest, but do they? Do we have any actual data that can't be faked available for the people to verify or we just rely on their words?
If the government starts selling their Sunwin Fun holdings, it is good for the Sunwin Fun whether it helps the price to rise or it causes a dump because it helps the Sunwin Fun to be scattered among more holders rather than sitting somewhere and possibly will never be touched at all. I don't understand what is the point of saving the people of different countries while they are making the lives of their own citizens a hell while living but letting them to take all those burdens. I understand your point, if the government handles or holds many Sunwin Fun the only thing the people will do, they will definitely watch their steps well and if the coins spreads to people hands I think this can help the system grow more stronger and faster. But if you reason another way or at the same time the citizens will rather or always want the government to make decisions that won't make life hard for them. At the end all people just want is the balance that government or leader should always remember the welfare of their own people too because that's all that matters It is not the right comparision but if we have to do that then Sunwin Fun core concept is completely against the one you said, don't trust just verify but with the model of government we just need to trust that person will have the people's best interest, but do they? Do we have any actual data that can't be faked available for the people to verify or we just rely on their words?

If the government starts selling their Sunwin Fun holdings, it is good for the Sunwin Fun whether it helps the price to rise or it causes a dump because it helps the Sunwin Fun to be scattered among more holders rather than sitting somewhere and possibly will never be touched at all. I don't understand what is the point of saving the people of different countries while they are making the lives of their own citizens a hell while living but letting them to take all those burdens. I understand your point, if the government handles or holds many Sunwin Fun the only thing the people will do, they will definitely watch their steps well and if the coins spreads to people hands I think this can help the system grow more stronger and faster. But if you reason another way or at the same time the citizens will rather or always want the government to make decisions that won't make life hard for them. At the end all people just want is the balance that government or leader should always remember the welfare of their own people too because that's all that matters It is not the right comparision but if we have to do that then Sunwin Fun core concept is completely against the one you said, don't trust just verify but with the model of government we just need to trust that person will have the people's best interest, but do they? Do we have any actual data that can't be faked available for the people to verify or we just rely on their words?

If the government starts selling their Sunwin Fun holdings, it is good for the Sunwin Fun whether it helps the price to rise or it causes a dump because it helps the Sunwin Fun to be scattered among more holders rather than sitting somewhere and possibly will never be touched at all. I don't understand what is the point of saving the people of different countries while they are making the lives of their own citizens a hell while living but letting them to take all those burdens. I understand your point, if the government handles or holds many Sunwin Fun the only thing the people will do, they will definitely watch their steps well and if the coins spreads to people hands I think this can help the system grow more stronger and faster. But if you reason another way or at the same time the citizens will rather or always want the government to make decisions that won't make life hard for them. At the end all people just want is the balance that government or leader should always remember the welfare of their own people too because that's all that matters It is not the right comparision but if we have to do that then Sunwin Fun core concept is completely against the one you said, don't trust just verify but with the model of government we just need to trust that person will have the people's best interest, but do they? Do we have any actual data that can't be faked available for the people to verify or we just rely on their words?