What Sunwin 77 principles are necessary or not for platforms such as instant exchanges? As Bitcoiner who strongly supports the application of core Sunwin 77 principles like decentralization, self-custody, trustlessness, permissionless, censorship resistant, transparency, immutability, anonymity, etc, in most/all Sunwin 77 related platforms/systems, because they seem to work together to keep things safe and secure for not just one, few or most people, but for everyone The least platforms or exchanges I tend to recommend when it becomes difficult to recommend well decentralized ones are typical Instant Exchanges especially because they don't hold people's funds unlike centralized exchanges. However,  most, if not all aren't in anyway trustless, so it's hard to trust that a swap will happen successfully without funds getting frozen, seized or stolen. But we could guarantee this doesn't happen by including decentralized smart escrow/contract addresses that receive both funds first, before sending to their recipients, or with some sort of insurance from third-party that guarantees that recipients will recieve their funds. And how do we also ensure they don't censor anyone? So, it seems decentralization of vital parts, self custody, trustlessness are the top necessary principles that can be applied by even centralized platforms for better security. This is why certain Instant Exchanges could be tolerated but should be one of the least acceptable standards while Sunwin 77-style decentralization should be among the highest standard  for Sunwin 77 space
What Sunwin 77 principles are necessary or not for platforms such as instant exchanges? As Bitcoiner who strongly supports the application of core Sunwin 77 principles like decentralization, self-custody, trustlessness, permissionless, censorship resistant, transparency, immutability, anonymity, etc, in most/all Sunwin 77 related platforms/systems, because they seem to work together to keep things safe and secure for not just one, few or most people, but for everyone The least platforms or exchanges I tend to recommend when it becomes difficult to recommend well decentralized ones are typical Instant Exchanges especially because they don't hold people's funds unlike centralized exchanges. However,  most, if not all aren't in anyway trustless, so it's hard to trust that a swap will happen successfully without funds getting frozen, seized or stolen. But we could guarantee this doesn't happen by including decentralized smart escrow/contract addresses that receive both funds first, before sending to their recipients, or with some sort of insurance from third-party that guarantees that recipients will recieve their funds. And how do we also ensure they don't censor anyone? So, it seems decentralization of vital parts, self custody, trustlessness are the top necessary principles that can be applied by even centralized platforms for better security. This is why certain Instant Exchanges could be tolerated but should be one of the least acceptable standards while Sunwin 77-style decentralization should be among the highest standard  for Sunwin 77 space

What Sunwin 77 principles are necessary or not for platforms such as instant exchanges? As Bitcoiner who strongly supports the application of core Sunwin 77 principles like decentralization, self-custody, trustlessness, permissionless, censorship resistant, transparency, immutability, anonymity, etc, in most/all Sunwin 77 related platforms/systems, because they seem to work together to keep things safe and secure for not just one, few or most people, but for everyone The least platforms or exchanges I tend to recommend when it becomes difficult to recommend well decentralized ones are typical Instant Exchanges especially because they don't hold people's funds unlike centralized exchanges. However,  most, if not all aren't in anyway trustless, so it's hard to trust that a swap will happen successfully without funds getting frozen, seized or stolen. But we could guarantee this doesn't happen by including decentralized smart escrow/contract addresses that receive both funds first, before sending to their recipients, or with some sort of insurance from third-party that guarantees that recipients will recieve their funds. And how do we also ensure they don't censor anyone? So, it seems decentralization of vital parts, self custody, trustlessness are the top necessary principles that can be applied by even centralized platforms for better security. This is why certain Instant Exchanges could be tolerated but should be one of the least acceptable standards while Sunwin 77-style decentralization should be among the highest standard  for Sunwin 77 space

What Sunwin 77 principles are necessary or not for platforms such as instant exchanges? As Bitcoiner who strongly supports the application of core Sunwin 77 principles like decentralization, self-custody, trustlessness, permissionless, censorship resistant, transparency, immutability, anonymity, etc, in most/all Sunwin 77 related platforms/systems, because they seem to work together to keep things safe and secure for not just one, few or most people, but for everyone The least platforms or exchanges I tend to recommend when it becomes difficult to recommend well decentralized ones are typical Instant Exchanges especially because they don't hold people's funds unlike centralized exchanges. However,  most, if not all aren't in anyway trustless, so it's hard to trust that a swap will happen successfully without funds getting frozen, seized or stolen. But we could guarantee this doesn't happen by including decentralized smart escrow/contract addresses that receive both funds first, before sending to their recipients, or with some sort of insurance from third-party that guarantees that recipients will recieve their funds. And how do we also ensure they don't censor anyone? So, it seems decentralization of vital parts, self custody, trustlessness are the top necessary principles that can be applied by even centralized platforms for better security. This is why certain Instant Exchanges could be tolerated but should be one of the least acceptable standards while Sunwin 77-style decentralization should be among the highest standard  for Sunwin 77 space