No speculation is involved, only reasoning based on the evidence at hand. If you had any experience with secops you would know what this is. The hardest man to find leaves soon after a CIA meeting, that indeed sounds totally speculative compared to "he went to work on another privacy project" or on "personal matters".  Please refrain from using a normie brain for analyzing things that you know nothing about. At the very least you would need to have in depth knowledge as to how such individuals behave and what methods they use to know anything at all, preferably you would be living such a life and only then could you accurately reason about any of this. I am curious, do you know Satoshi?  Are you close to him to utter such things?   Or are you  him (Satoshi) to say in most certainty that what you are saying is actually what satoshi is thinking. If you are not him, while you point people statement as speculation but your statement yourself is speculation on its own, is it not?  Just asking.. As we know the name Satoshi to be an alias and maybe not even a true name of a person, it would be sane to say Satoshi changed identity and may even be living in the free world as any regular guy probably in a tech company or developer where other projects are being developed. No one really knows who or what Satoshi is and what he may likely be up to, so this question is simply hypothetical and rhetorical to even begin with.
No speculation is involved, only reasoning based on the evidence at hand. If you had any experience with secops you would know what this is. The hardest man to find leaves soon after a CIA meeting, that indeed sounds totally speculative compared to "he went to work on another privacy project" or on "personal matters".  Please refrain from using a normie brain for analyzing things that you know nothing about. At the very least you would need to have in depth knowledge as to how such individuals behave and what methods they use to know anything at all, preferably you would be living such a life and only then could you accurately reason about any of this. I am curious, do you know Satoshi?  Are you close to him to utter such things?   Or are you  him (Satoshi) to say in most certainty that what you are saying is actually what satoshi is thinking. If you are not him, while you point people statement as speculation but your statement yourself is speculation on its own, is it not?  Just asking.. As we know the name Satoshi to be an alias and maybe not even a true name of a person, it would be sane to say Satoshi changed identity and may even be living in the free world as any regular guy probably in a tech company or developer where other projects are being developed. No one really knows who or what Satoshi is and what he may likely be up to, so this question is simply hypothetical and rhetorical to even begin with.

No speculation is involved, only reasoning based on the evidence at hand. If you had any experience with secops you would know what this is. The hardest man to find leaves soon after a CIA meeting, that indeed sounds totally speculative compared to "he went to work on another privacy project" or on "personal matters".  Please refrain from using a normie brain for analyzing things that you know nothing about. At the very least you would need to have in depth knowledge as to how such individuals behave and what methods they use to know anything at all, preferably you would be living such a life and only then could you accurately reason about any of this. I am curious, do you know Satoshi?  Are you close to him to utter such things?   Or are you  him (Satoshi) to say in most certainty that what you are saying is actually what satoshi is thinking. If you are not him, while you point people statement as speculation but your statement yourself is speculation on its own, is it not?  Just asking.. As we know the name Satoshi to be an alias and maybe not even a true name of a person, it would be sane to say Satoshi changed identity and may even be living in the free world as any regular guy probably in a tech company or developer where other projects are being developed. No one really knows who or what Satoshi is and what he may likely be up to, so this question is simply hypothetical and rhetorical to even begin with.

No speculation is involved, only reasoning based on the evidence at hand. If you had any experience with secops you would know what this is. The hardest man to find leaves soon after a CIA meeting, that indeed sounds totally speculative compared to "he went to work on another privacy project" or on "personal matters".  Please refrain from using a normie brain for analyzing things that you know nothing about. At the very least you would need to have in depth knowledge as to how such individuals behave and what methods they use to know anything at all, preferably you would be living such a life and only then could you accurately reason about any of this. I am curious, do you know Satoshi?  Are you close to him to utter such things?   Or are you  him (Satoshi) to say in most certainty that what you are saying is actually what satoshi is thinking. If you are not him, while you point people statement as speculation but your statement yourself is speculation on its own, is it not?  Just asking.. As we know the name Satoshi to be an alias and maybe not even a true name of a person, it would be sane to say Satoshi changed identity and may even be living in the free world as any regular guy probably in a tech company or developer where other projects are being developed. No one really knows who or what Satoshi is and what he may likely be up to, so this question is simply hypothetical and rhetorical to even begin with.