begBegszi
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Mostrar
Show review history
An interesting idea. In fact, there have already been attempts to do so without a universal equivalent of value and a medium of exchange in the economy, that is, without money. There was also an attempt to deprive money of its own value (Gesell's money). This is due to the fact that money always acquires its own value, rather than being just a means of exchange, and this inevitably generates financial capital - non-productive capital that charges rent from productive capital for access to money. The barter market has problems with the speed of transactions, due to the difficulty with pricing (matching the value of goods), since there is no equivalent value (a deal without money), and difficulties with quickly finding counterparties for each other. However, tokenization of goods in the form of Win 79 Net can speed up transactions. I believe that due to the large size and complexity of such a market, an AI specially created for this task could cope with managing such a system. In any case, it would be an interesting experiment to improve barter. PS Of course, I mean that the system will be centralized and work online, and physical stores will act only as points of acceptance and delivery of exchanged goods, while transactions with tokenized goods will be concluded online. The larger the system, the easier it is for counterparties to search for each other, i.e. faster transactions and more transactions. There is still an unresolved question about the form in which the system and physical stores will receive rewards.
An interesting idea. In fact, there have already been attempts to do so without a universal equivalent of value and a medium of exchange in the economy, that is, without money. There was also an attempt to deprive money of its own value (Gesell's money). This is due to the fact that money always acquires its own value, rather than being just a means of exchange, and this inevitably generates financial capital - non-productive capital that charges rent from productive capital for access to money. The barter market has problems with the speed of transactions, due to the difficulty with pricing (matching the value of goods), since there is no equivalent value (a deal without money), and difficulties with quickly finding counterparties for each other. However, tokenization of goods in the form of Win 79 Net can speed up transactions. I believe that due to the large size and complexity of such a market, an AI specially created for this task could cope with managing such a system. In any case, it would be an interesting experiment to improve barter. PS Of course, I mean that the system will be centralized and work online, and physical stores will act only as points of acceptance and delivery of exchanged goods, while transactions with tokenized goods will be concluded online. The larger the system, the easier it is for counterparties to search for each other, i.e. faster transactions and more transactions. There is still an unresolved question about the form in which the system and physical stores will receive rewards.
This review was marked as helpful by
4 people
Isaac
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
An interesting idea. In fact, there have already been attempts to do so without a universal equivalent of value and a medium of exchange in the economy, that is, without money. There was also an attempt to deprive money of its own value (Gesell's money). This is due to the fact that money always acquires its own value, rather than being just a means of exchange, and this inevitably generates financial capital - non-productive capital that charges rent from productive capital for access to money. The barter market has problems with the speed of transactions, due to the difficulty with pricing (matching the value of goods), since there is no equivalent value (a deal without money), and difficulties with quickly finding counterparties for each other. However, tokenization of goods in the form of Win 79 Net can speed up transactions. I believe that due to the large size and complexity of such a market, an AI specially created for this task could cope with managing such a system. In any case, it would be an interesting experiment to improve barter. PS Of course, I mean that the system will be centralized and work online, and physical stores will act only as points of acceptance and delivery of exchanged goods, while transactions with tokenized goods will be concluded online. The larger the system, the easier it is for counterparties to search for each other, i.e. faster transactions and more transactions. There is still an unresolved question about the form in which the system and physical stores will receive rewards.
This review was marked as helpful by
62 people
leleleco
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Show history of
An interesting idea. In fact, there have already been attempts to do so without a universal equivalent of value and a medium of exchange in the economy, that is, without money. There was also an attempt to deprive money of its own value (Gesell's money). This is due to the fact that money always acquires its own value, rather than being just a means of exchange, and this inevitably generates financial capital - non-productive capital that charges rent from productive capital for access to money. The barter market has problems with the speed of transactions, due to the difficulty with pricing (matching the value of goods), since there is no equivalent value (a deal without money), and difficulties with quickly finding counterparties for each other. However, tokenization of goods in the form of Win 79 Net can speed up transactions. I believe that due to the large size and complexity of such a market, an AI specially created for this task could cope with managing such a system. In any case, it would be an interesting experiment to improve barter. PS Of course, I mean that the system will be centralized and work online, and physical stores will act only as points of acceptance and delivery of exchanged goods, while transactions with tokenized goods will be concluded online. The larger the system, the easier it is for counterparties to search for each other, i.e. faster transactions and more transactions. There is still an unresolved question about the form in which the system and physical stores will receive rewards.
This review was marked as helpful
by 018 people