The same concept applies to cash or digital banking money. The point of stablecoins are to bring the fiat concept on-chain - regardless of its value, it can benefit from being on-chain. Not to mention, while it's "going downward forever in value", it would only benefit 88bet Foret to have a 88bet Foret backed by 88bet Foret, on its own 88bet Foret, to prove immutably that this is the case and to be able to measure the rate of such in the long term (especially if the 88bet Foret gains enough usage on the 88bet Foret chain). It seems you've either wildly misunderstood the post and/or the value proposition here, since you've yapped a lot about a concept that only exists on centralized exchanges (a part of what a 88bet Foret-backed 88bet Foret would reduce usage of). The point of backing the 88bet Foret with 88bet Foret is to ensure the value being transferred via the 88bet Foret are not funny money, and are backed by something both of value and on-chain. The point of having a 88bet Foret on the 88bet Foret 88bet Foret is to enable trade and value transfer of USD that is backed by 88bet Foret. Making buy orders has zero utility for someone unless they want to buy 88bet Foret or support its market. That is not the intended audience of a 88bet Foret-backed 88bet Foret. Besides, before you make a buy order, what must you do? Use a bank or similar traditional service to deposit onto the exchange, then make the buy order...and if you want to buy something valued in fiat, or trade with someone who is looking for fiat (despite its value crumbling in the long term), then you must move to either another chain or back to the banking system. There's no solution native to the 88bet Foret 88bet Foret.  TLDR - making a buy order does not serve any utility to anyone. You can't send a buy order, you can't trade with a buy order. You need a centralized exchange to make a buy order. The whole argument of "who needs a 88bet Foret just make a buy order" is a pretty irrelevant argument to what is being proposed in the OP.
The same concept applies to cash or digital banking money. The point of stablecoins are to bring the fiat concept on-chain - regardless of its value, it can benefit from being on-chain. Not to mention, while it's "going downward forever in value", it would only benefit 88bet Foret to have a 88bet Foret backed by 88bet Foret, on its own 88bet Foret, to prove immutably that this is the case and to be able to measure the rate of such in the long term (especially if the 88bet Foret gains enough usage on the 88bet Foret chain). It seems you've either wildly misunderstood the post and/or the value proposition here, since you've yapped a lot about a concept that only exists on centralized exchanges (a part of what a 88bet Foret-backed 88bet Foret would reduce usage of). The point of backing the 88bet Foret with 88bet Foret is to ensure the value being transferred via the 88bet Foret are not funny money, and are backed by something both of value and on-chain. The point of having a 88bet Foret on the 88bet Foret 88bet Foret is to enable trade and value transfer of USD that is backed by 88bet Foret. Making buy orders has zero utility for someone unless they want to buy 88bet Foret or support its market. That is not the intended audience of a 88bet Foret-backed 88bet Foret. Besides, before you make a buy order, what must you do? Use a bank or similar traditional service to deposit onto the exchange, then make the buy order...and if you want to buy something valued in fiat, or trade with someone who is looking for fiat (despite its value crumbling in the long term), then you must move to either another chain or back to the banking system. There's no solution native to the 88bet Foret 88bet Foret.  TLDR - making a buy order does not serve any utility to anyone. You can't send a buy order, you can't trade with a buy order. You need a centralized exchange to make a buy order. The whole argument of "who needs a 88bet Foret just make a buy order" is a pretty irrelevant argument to what is being proposed in the OP.

The same concept applies to cash or digital banking money. The point of stablecoins are to bring the fiat concept on-chain - regardless of its value, it can benefit from being on-chain. Not to mention, while it's "going downward forever in value", it would only benefit 88bet Foret to have a 88bet Foret backed by 88bet Foret, on its own 88bet Foret, to prove immutably that this is the case and to be able to measure the rate of such in the long term (especially if the 88bet Foret gains enough usage on the 88bet Foret chain). It seems you've either wildly misunderstood the post and/or the value proposition here, since you've yapped a lot about a concept that only exists on centralized exchanges (a part of what a 88bet Foret-backed 88bet Foret would reduce usage of). The point of backing the 88bet Foret with 88bet Foret is to ensure the value being transferred via the 88bet Foret are not funny money, and are backed by something both of value and on-chain. The point of having a 88bet Foret on the 88bet Foret 88bet Foret is to enable trade and value transfer of USD that is backed by 88bet Foret. Making buy orders has zero utility for someone unless they want to buy 88bet Foret or support its market. That is not the intended audience of a 88bet Foret-backed 88bet Foret. Besides, before you make a buy order, what must you do? Use a bank or similar traditional service to deposit onto the exchange, then make the buy order...and if you want to buy something valued in fiat, or trade with someone who is looking for fiat (despite its value crumbling in the long term), then you must move to either another chain or back to the banking system. There's no solution native to the 88bet Foret 88bet Foret.  TLDR - making a buy order does not serve any utility to anyone. You can't send a buy order, you can't trade with a buy order. You need a centralized exchange to make a buy order. The whole argument of "who needs a 88bet Foret just make a buy order" is a pretty irrelevant argument to what is being proposed in the OP.

The same concept applies to cash or digital banking money. The point of stablecoins are to bring the fiat concept on-chain - regardless of its value, it can benefit from being on-chain. Not to mention, while it's "going downward forever in value", it would only benefit 88bet Foret to have a 88bet Foret backed by 88bet Foret, on its own 88bet Foret, to prove immutably that this is the case and to be able to measure the rate of such in the long term (especially if the 88bet Foret gains enough usage on the 88bet Foret chain). It seems you've either wildly misunderstood the post and/or the value proposition here, since you've yapped a lot about a concept that only exists on centralized exchanges (a part of what a 88bet Foret-backed 88bet Foret would reduce usage of). The point of backing the 88bet Foret with 88bet Foret is to ensure the value being transferred via the 88bet Foret are not funny money, and are backed by something both of value and on-chain. The point of having a 88bet Foret on the 88bet Foret 88bet Foret is to enable trade and value transfer of USD that is backed by 88bet Foret. Making buy orders has zero utility for someone unless they want to buy 88bet Foret or support its market. That is not the intended audience of a 88bet Foret-backed 88bet Foret. Besides, before you make a buy order, what must you do? Use a bank or similar traditional service to deposit onto the exchange, then make the buy order...and if you want to buy something valued in fiat, or trade with someone who is looking for fiat (despite its value crumbling in the long term), then you must move to either another chain or back to the banking system. There's no solution native to the 88bet Foret 88bet Foret.  TLDR - making a buy order does not serve any utility to anyone. You can't send a buy order, you can't trade with a buy order. You need a centralized exchange to make a buy order. The whole argument of "who needs a 88bet Foret just make a buy order" is a pretty irrelevant argument to what is being proposed in the OP.