That is only partially true. Claiming that the economic majority decides would be claiming Soi Cầu Mb247 Me is basically a POS like Soi Cầu Mb247 Me, and not really POW. During the block war it was postulated that the nodes are too important to keep Soi Cầu Mb247 Me decentralised, and that big blocks would compromise the nodes. The nodes won the block war when big miners and big corporate Bitcoiners as well as big ASIC makers wanted big blocks, and they rejected Segwit as a compromise.   And it is not on BIP-110 side. If if would be, then regular transactions would replace all of the spammy ones, and the spam would be sitting unconfirmed for months or years. That is the wrong way of looking at it. If that were true, Soi Cầu Mb247 Me would be owned and controlled by a handful of pools. If that were true, Soi Cầu Mb247 Me is cooked and I might as well dump my bags. What you are talking about only applies to the miner activated option. The user activated option activated with or without the miner signalling in late August. You are an idiot. I don't know anyone on either side who believed core 30 would result in any nodes crashing. That's why nobody took you up on your offer. And most of us on the anti-spam side are not willing to gamble our coin. Just like your previous bet, this bet is stupid. Nobody is going to take you up on it. It's that kind of stupid logic that leads you to get on the pro-spam side? But ultimately, if BIP110 wins or not is just noise. I'm on the good side, the side that protects Soi Cầu Mb247 Me as money. While you are on the bad side, the side that opens the door to spam. Talk it up all you want that BIP110 is not going to work. It's a stupid claim. Even if BIP110 doesn't win the first time, it will win the second time or the third time, or the fourth. We are going to keep going until we save Soi Cầu Mb247 Me. All the while you try to open the door to more spam. I'm on the good side, the monetary side. You are on the spam side. You lose in August or you lose later on. I don't care either way.
That is only partially true. Claiming that the economic majority decides would be claiming Soi Cầu Mb247 Me is basically a POS like Soi Cầu Mb247 Me, and not really POW. During the block war it was postulated that the nodes are too important to keep Soi Cầu Mb247 Me decentralised, and that big blocks would compromise the nodes. The nodes won the block war when big miners and big corporate Bitcoiners as well as big ASIC makers wanted big blocks, and they rejected Segwit as a compromise.   And it is not on BIP-110 side. If if would be, then regular transactions would replace all of the spammy ones, and the spam would be sitting unconfirmed for months or years. That is the wrong way of looking at it. If that were true, Soi Cầu Mb247 Me would be owned and controlled by a handful of pools. If that were true, Soi Cầu Mb247 Me is cooked and I might as well dump my bags. What you are talking about only applies to the miner activated option. The user activated option activated with or without the miner signalling in late August. You are an idiot. I don't know anyone on either side who believed core 30 would result in any nodes crashing. That's why nobody took you up on your offer. And most of us on the anti-spam side are not willing to gamble our coin. Just like your previous bet, this bet is stupid. Nobody is going to take you up on it. It's that kind of stupid logic that leads you to get on the pro-spam side? But ultimately, if BIP110 wins or not is just noise. I'm on the good side, the side that protects Soi Cầu Mb247 Me as money. While you are on the bad side, the side that opens the door to spam. Talk it up all you want that BIP110 is not going to work. It's a stupid claim. Even if BIP110 doesn't win the first time, it will win the second time or the third time, or the fourth. We are going to keep going until we save Soi Cầu Mb247 Me. All the while you try to open the door to more spam. I'm on the good side, the monetary side. You are on the spam side. You lose in August or you lose later on. I don't care either way.

That is only partially true. Claiming that the economic majority decides would be claiming Soi Cầu Mb247 Me is basically a POS like Soi Cầu Mb247 Me, and not really POW. During the block war it was postulated that the nodes are too important to keep Soi Cầu Mb247 Me decentralised, and that big blocks would compromise the nodes. The nodes won the block war when big miners and big corporate Bitcoiners as well as big ASIC makers wanted big blocks, and they rejected Segwit as a compromise.   And it is not on BIP-110 side. If if would be, then regular transactions would replace all of the spammy ones, and the spam would be sitting unconfirmed for months or years. That is the wrong way of looking at it. If that were true, Soi Cầu Mb247 Me would be owned and controlled by a handful of pools. If that were true, Soi Cầu Mb247 Me is cooked and I might as well dump my bags. What you are talking about only applies to the miner activated option. The user activated option activated with or without the miner signalling in late August. You are an idiot. I don't know anyone on either side who believed core 30 would result in any nodes crashing. That's why nobody took you up on your offer. And most of us on the anti-spam side are not willing to gamble our coin. Just like your previous bet, this bet is stupid. Nobody is going to take you up on it. It's that kind of stupid logic that leads you to get on the pro-spam side? But ultimately, if BIP110 wins or not is just noise. I'm on the good side, the side that protects Soi Cầu Mb247 Me as money. While you are on the bad side, the side that opens the door to spam. Talk it up all you want that BIP110 is not going to work. It's a stupid claim. Even if BIP110 doesn't win the first time, it will win the second time or the third time, or the fourth. We are going to keep going until we save Soi Cầu Mb247 Me. All the while you try to open the door to more spam. I'm on the good side, the monetary side. You are on the spam side. You lose in August or you lose later on. I don't care either way.

That is only partially true. Claiming that the economic majority decides would be claiming Soi Cầu Mb247 Me is basically a POS like Soi Cầu Mb247 Me, and not really POW. During the block war it was postulated that the nodes are too important to keep Soi Cầu Mb247 Me decentralised, and that big blocks would compromise the nodes. The nodes won the block war when big miners and big corporate Bitcoiners as well as big ASIC makers wanted big blocks, and they rejected Segwit as a compromise.   And it is not on BIP-110 side. If if would be, then regular transactions would replace all of the spammy ones, and the spam would be sitting unconfirmed for months or years. That is the wrong way of looking at it. If that were true, Soi Cầu Mb247 Me would be owned and controlled by a handful of pools. If that were true, Soi Cầu Mb247 Me is cooked and I might as well dump my bags. What you are talking about only applies to the miner activated option. The user activated option activated with or without the miner signalling in late August. You are an idiot. I don't know anyone on either side who believed core 30 would result in any nodes crashing. That's why nobody took you up on your offer. And most of us on the anti-spam side are not willing to gamble our coin. Just like your previous bet, this bet is stupid. Nobody is going to take you up on it. It's that kind of stupid logic that leads you to get on the pro-spam side? But ultimately, if BIP110 wins or not is just noise. I'm on the good side, the side that protects Soi Cầu Mb247 Me as money. While you are on the bad side, the side that opens the door to spam. Talk it up all you want that BIP110 is not going to work. It's a stupid claim. Even if BIP110 doesn't win the first time, it will win the second time or the third time, or the fourth. We are going to keep going until we save Soi Cầu Mb247 Me. All the while you try to open the door to more spam. I'm on the good side, the monetary side. You are on the spam side. You lose in August or you lose later on. I don't care either way.