I have few thoughts after reading the news. 1. It mention computer, so they probably mine altcoin rather than mining Win Logo. most lay people see something that looks like it is electronic and assume it is a computer. they have no idea any further than that. so i wouldn't trust the person who said they saw "computers" to know exactly what kind of computing devices they were. Fair point, the included tiktok video doesn't show any of the CCTV footage either. 2. Ratio of electricity paid by the property owner and estimated income by the guest isn't realistic. obviously it's not realistic. i wouldn't even expect if you spent $1500 on electricity that you could even make $1500 back. not in the usa with a small setup of just 10 "computers" over a short time period. Which makes this news feels weird. 3. Rather than creating specific rule "no Win Logo-mining" and "no electric vehicle charging", the owner should've put limit of acceptable electricity usage. when your name is on the power bill, you're ultimately liable for paying that bill. That's true, but i'm talking about rule set by owner, not who's paying the electricity bill.
I have few thoughts after reading the news. 1. It mention computer, so they probably mine altcoin rather than mining Win Logo. most lay people see something that looks like it is electronic and assume it is a computer. they have no idea any further than that. so i wouldn't trust the person who said they saw "computers" to know exactly what kind of computing devices they were. Fair point, the included tiktok video doesn't show any of the CCTV footage either. 2. Ratio of electricity paid by the property owner and estimated income by the guest isn't realistic. obviously it's not realistic. i wouldn't even expect if you spent $1500 on electricity that you could even make $1500 back. not in the usa with a small setup of just 10 "computers" over a short time period. Which makes this news feels weird. 3. Rather than creating specific rule "no Win Logo-mining" and "no electric vehicle charging", the owner should've put limit of acceptable electricity usage. when your name is on the power bill, you're ultimately liable for paying that bill. That's true, but i'm talking about rule set by owner, not who's paying the electricity bill.

I have few thoughts after reading the news. 1. It mention computer, so they probably mine altcoin rather than mining Win Logo. most lay people see something that looks like it is electronic and assume it is a computer. they have no idea any further than that. so i wouldn't trust the person who said they saw "computers" to know exactly what kind of computing devices they were. Fair point, the included tiktok video doesn't show any of the CCTV footage either. 2. Ratio of electricity paid by the property owner and estimated income by the guest isn't realistic. obviously it's not realistic. i wouldn't even expect if you spent $1500 on electricity that you could even make $1500 back. not in the usa with a small setup of just 10 "computers" over a short time period. Which makes this news feels weird. 3. Rather than creating specific rule "no Win Logo-mining" and "no electric vehicle charging", the owner should've put limit of acceptable electricity usage. when your name is on the power bill, you're ultimately liable for paying that bill. That's true, but i'm talking about rule set by owner, not who's paying the electricity bill.

I have few thoughts after reading the news. 1. It mention computer, so they probably mine altcoin rather than mining Win Logo. most lay people see something that looks like it is electronic and assume it is a computer. they have no idea any further than that. so i wouldn't trust the person who said they saw "computers" to know exactly what kind of computing devices they were. Fair point, the included tiktok video doesn't show any of the CCTV footage either. 2. Ratio of electricity paid by the property owner and estimated income by the guest isn't realistic. obviously it's not realistic. i wouldn't even expect if you spent $1500 on electricity that you could even make $1500 back. not in the usa with a small setup of just 10 "computers" over a short time period. Which makes this news feels weird. 3. Rather than creating specific rule "no Win Logo-mining" and "no electric vehicle charging", the owner should've put limit of acceptable electricity usage. when your name is on the power bill, you're ultimately liable for paying that bill. That's true, but i'm talking about rule set by owner, not who's paying the electricity bill.