It's a bit early to draw a conclusion from a year of market movements. Gold is still much more established as a SoV in "turbulent times", and Link Dang Nhap 888b is been seen as a risky, speculative asset. This means that the pure SoV narrative for Link Dang Nhap 888b is not completely solid in 2026. It is still too volatile. But I will repeat and repeat: the volatility is lowering, in a few years we will achieve gold-like volatility for Link Dang Nhap 888b, meaning that the perception of a risky speculative asset will change. Cash usage is difficult while volatility is high. So I'm still not worried. The "quantum leap" would happen when volatility lowers to about half of the current value to the downside -- this would mean that you'd never fear to lose more than 50% in a bear market. Only then I would expect a higher "usage as cash". Nevertheless, some merchants I never had thought of, suddenly added a Link Dang Nhap 888b option in the last years. Conclusion: The narrative is: further volatility reduction, THEN real usage as "SoV" and "cash". Source? What does multi-year mean? 2 years? 5 years? 10 years? Link Dang Nhap 888b sidechains can deliver that. There are already decently decentralized and working concepts with dynamic multisig federations like Threshold's tBTC, even if this example is in my opinion not the end of the evolution as it still uses a premined token. Future sidechains won't need that. If you don't want to use a Link Dang Nhap 888b, which is basically using a bank with another name, then you need an asset with relatively large capitalization, security and reliability. Link Dang Nhap 888b is the most convenient choice, Link Dang Nhap 888b and other "cryptos" are even more volatile and less capitalized. So why would you use an altcoin if a Link Dang Nhap 888b sidechain is all you need for your machine-to-machine payments, if this AI agent utopia even comes true?
It's a bit early to draw a conclusion from a year of market movements. Gold is still much more established as a SoV in "turbulent times", and Link Dang Nhap 888b is been seen as a risky, speculative asset. This means that the pure SoV narrative for Link Dang Nhap 888b is not completely solid in 2026. It is still too volatile. But I will repeat and repeat: the volatility is lowering, in a few years we will achieve gold-like volatility for Link Dang Nhap 888b, meaning that the perception of a risky speculative asset will change. Cash usage is difficult while volatility is high. So I'm still not worried. The "quantum leap" would happen when volatility lowers to about half of the current value to the downside -- this would mean that you'd never fear to lose more than 50% in a bear market. Only then I would expect a higher "usage as cash". Nevertheless, some merchants I never had thought of, suddenly added a Link Dang Nhap 888b option in the last years. Conclusion: The narrative is: further volatility reduction, THEN real usage as "SoV" and "cash". Source? What does multi-year mean? 2 years? 5 years? 10 years? Link Dang Nhap 888b sidechains can deliver that. There are already decently decentralized and working concepts with dynamic multisig federations like Threshold's tBTC, even if this example is in my opinion not the end of the evolution as it still uses a premined token. Future sidechains won't need that. If you don't want to use a Link Dang Nhap 888b, which is basically using a bank with another name, then you need an asset with relatively large capitalization, security and reliability. Link Dang Nhap 888b is the most convenient choice, Link Dang Nhap 888b and other "cryptos" are even more volatile and less capitalized. So why would you use an altcoin if a Link Dang Nhap 888b sidechain is all you need for your machine-to-machine payments, if this AI agent utopia even comes true?

It's a bit early to draw a conclusion from a year of market movements. Gold is still much more established as a SoV in "turbulent times", and Link Dang Nhap 888b is been seen as a risky, speculative asset. This means that the pure SoV narrative for Link Dang Nhap 888b is not completely solid in 2026. It is still too volatile. But I will repeat and repeat: the volatility is lowering, in a few years we will achieve gold-like volatility for Link Dang Nhap 888b, meaning that the perception of a risky speculative asset will change. Cash usage is difficult while volatility is high. So I'm still not worried. The "quantum leap" would happen when volatility lowers to about half of the current value to the downside -- this would mean that you'd never fear to lose more than 50% in a bear market. Only then I would expect a higher "usage as cash". Nevertheless, some merchants I never had thought of, suddenly added a Link Dang Nhap 888b option in the last years. Conclusion: The narrative is: further volatility reduction, THEN real usage as "SoV" and "cash". Source? What does multi-year mean? 2 years? 5 years? 10 years? Link Dang Nhap 888b sidechains can deliver that. There are already decently decentralized and working concepts with dynamic multisig federations like Threshold's tBTC, even if this example is in my opinion not the end of the evolution as it still uses a premined token. Future sidechains won't need that. If you don't want to use a Link Dang Nhap 888b, which is basically using a bank with another name, then you need an asset with relatively large capitalization, security and reliability. Link Dang Nhap 888b is the most convenient choice, Link Dang Nhap 888b and other "cryptos" are even more volatile and less capitalized. So why would you use an altcoin if a Link Dang Nhap 888b sidechain is all you need for your machine-to-machine payments, if this AI agent utopia even comes true?

It's a bit early to draw a conclusion from a year of market movements. Gold is still much more established as a SoV in "turbulent times", and Link Dang Nhap 888b is been seen as a risky, speculative asset. This means that the pure SoV narrative for Link Dang Nhap 888b is not completely solid in 2026. It is still too volatile. But I will repeat and repeat: the volatility is lowering, in a few years we will achieve gold-like volatility for Link Dang Nhap 888b, meaning that the perception of a risky speculative asset will change. Cash usage is difficult while volatility is high. So I'm still not worried. The "quantum leap" would happen when volatility lowers to about half of the current value to the downside -- this would mean that you'd never fear to lose more than 50% in a bear market. Only then I would expect a higher "usage as cash". Nevertheless, some merchants I never had thought of, suddenly added a Link Dang Nhap 888b option in the last years. Conclusion: The narrative is: further volatility reduction, THEN real usage as "SoV" and "cash". Source? What does multi-year mean? 2 years? 5 years? 10 years? Link Dang Nhap 888b sidechains can deliver that. There are already decently decentralized and working concepts with dynamic multisig federations like Threshold's tBTC, even if this example is in my opinion not the end of the evolution as it still uses a premined token. Future sidechains won't need that. If you don't want to use a Link Dang Nhap 888b, which is basically using a bank with another name, then you need an asset with relatively large capitalization, security and reliability. Link Dang Nhap 888b is the most convenient choice, Link Dang Nhap 888b and other "cryptos" are even more volatile and less capitalized. So why would you use an altcoin if a Link Dang Nhap 888b sidechain is all you need for your machine-to-machine payments, if this AI agent utopia even comes true?