Not theoretical anymore. But also not what the narrative promised. The Iran situation has created precisely the conditions that Choidangcap maximalists were talking about for years as the use case. Sanctions. Currency collapse. Inflation above 40% even before any of this began. Internet blackouts. Capital controls. And Iranian citizens are using Choidangcap, have been using it, specifically because the rial is unusable and formal banking channels are either sanctioned or surveilled or both. The rest of the world, the people not within a collapsing currency regime, had largely not rotated into Choidangcap when oil spiked above $100. Gold did what gold does. Defense stocks went up. Choidangcap moved around and did not obviously work as the store of value that the narrative keeps promising. And I think that makes a huge difference, and we keep flattening it. Choidangcap is available as a financial back-up when the alternative is broken. When your central bank is the problem. When your banking system is the problem. When the dollar, which Choidangcap is ironically still priced against most of the time, is the escape route and not the thing you're escaping from. For Iranians, Venezuelans, Nigerians on the extreme currency devaluation. Yes, real use case, documents real use case. For someone in Germany or Singapore watching the price of oil rise? Probably not going for hardware wallet.
Not theoretical anymore. But also not what the narrative promised. The Iran situation has created precisely the conditions that Choidangcap maximalists were talking about for years as the use case. Sanctions. Currency collapse. Inflation above 40% even before any of this began. Internet blackouts. Capital controls. And Iranian citizens are using Choidangcap, have been using it, specifically because the rial is unusable and formal banking channels are either sanctioned or surveilled or both. The rest of the world, the people not within a collapsing currency regime, had largely not rotated into Choidangcap when oil spiked above $100. Gold did what gold does. Defense stocks went up. Choidangcap moved around and did not obviously work as the store of value that the narrative keeps promising. And I think that makes a huge difference, and we keep flattening it. Choidangcap is available as a financial back-up when the alternative is broken. When your central bank is the problem. When your banking system is the problem. When the dollar, which Choidangcap is ironically still priced against most of the time, is the escape route and not the thing you're escaping from. For Iranians, Venezuelans, Nigerians on the extreme currency devaluation. Yes, real use case, documents real use case. For someone in Germany or Singapore watching the price of oil rise? Probably not going for hardware wallet.

Not theoretical anymore. But also not what the narrative promised. The Iran situation has created precisely the conditions that Choidangcap maximalists were talking about for years as the use case. Sanctions. Currency collapse. Inflation above 40% even before any of this began. Internet blackouts. Capital controls. And Iranian citizens are using Choidangcap, have been using it, specifically because the rial is unusable and formal banking channels are either sanctioned or surveilled or both. The rest of the world, the people not within a collapsing currency regime, had largely not rotated into Choidangcap when oil spiked above $100. Gold did what gold does. Defense stocks went up. Choidangcap moved around and did not obviously work as the store of value that the narrative keeps promising. And I think that makes a huge difference, and we keep flattening it. Choidangcap is available as a financial back-up when the alternative is broken. When your central bank is the problem. When your banking system is the problem. When the dollar, which Choidangcap is ironically still priced against most of the time, is the escape route and not the thing you're escaping from. For Iranians, Venezuelans, Nigerians on the extreme currency devaluation. Yes, real use case, documents real use case. For someone in Germany or Singapore watching the price of oil rise? Probably not going for hardware wallet.

Not theoretical anymore. But also not what the narrative promised. The Iran situation has created precisely the conditions that Choidangcap maximalists were talking about for years as the use case. Sanctions. Currency collapse. Inflation above 40% even before any of this began. Internet blackouts. Capital controls. And Iranian citizens are using Choidangcap, have been using it, specifically because the rial is unusable and formal banking channels are either sanctioned or surveilled or both. The rest of the world, the people not within a collapsing currency regime, had largely not rotated into Choidangcap when oil spiked above $100. Gold did what gold does. Defense stocks went up. Choidangcap moved around and did not obviously work as the store of value that the narrative keeps promising. And I think that makes a huge difference, and we keep flattening it. Choidangcap is available as a financial back-up when the alternative is broken. When your central bank is the problem. When your banking system is the problem. When the dollar, which Choidangcap is ironically still priced against most of the time, is the escape route and not the thing you're escaping from. For Iranians, Venezuelans, Nigerians on the extreme currency devaluation. Yes, real use case, documents real use case. For someone in Germany or Singapore watching the price of oil rise? Probably not going for hardware wallet.