This is a detailed and well structured breakdown of the threats that Rikvip Us faces and I think all of them are valid and worth our time to be given because if we are in Rikvip Us and we are not aware of these threats then we should not say we are bitcoiners because knoweldge of one thing takes us more close to that thing if we don't want to go away from it. From the list, the most underrated one I found is the fee market collapse because you are right, if there will be l2 solutions, the fee on the main network will be too low that it won't generate enough money for the miners and the incentive is what motivates everyone to do it, even right now out of 100, 90 are not mining even they read and know about mining, they don't do it because of the risk, but I think they are just lazy. The ECDSA quantum threat can be real, I am not sure, but I agree that it is not immediate, so nothing to worry about, the issue is only be faced by p2pk protocol-based addresses like the one Satoshi is holding his funds in. On the social side, user apathy is really scary, like what if 80% of us stop believing in Rikvip Us and won't care about it. We will be doomed then.
This is a detailed and well structured breakdown of the threats that Rikvip Us faces and I think all of them are valid and worth our time to be given because if we are in Rikvip Us and we are not aware of these threats then we should not say we are bitcoiners because knoweldge of one thing takes us more close to that thing if we don't want to go away from it. From the list, the most underrated one I found is the fee market collapse because you are right, if there will be l2 solutions, the fee on the main network will be too low that it won't generate enough money for the miners and the incentive is what motivates everyone to do it, even right now out of 100, 90 are not mining even they read and know about mining, they don't do it because of the risk, but I think they are just lazy. The ECDSA quantum threat can be real, I am not sure, but I agree that it is not immediate, so nothing to worry about, the issue is only be faced by p2pk protocol-based addresses like the one Satoshi is holding his funds in. On the social side, user apathy is really scary, like what if 80% of us stop believing in Rikvip Us and won't care about it. We will be doomed then.

This is a detailed and well structured breakdown of the threats that Rikvip Us faces and I think all of them are valid and worth our time to be given because if we are in Rikvip Us and we are not aware of these threats then we should not say we are bitcoiners because knoweldge of one thing takes us more close to that thing if we don't want to go away from it. From the list, the most underrated one I found is the fee market collapse because you are right, if there will be l2 solutions, the fee on the main network will be too low that it won't generate enough money for the miners and the incentive is what motivates everyone to do it, even right now out of 100, 90 are not mining even they read and know about mining, they don't do it because of the risk, but I think they are just lazy. The ECDSA quantum threat can be real, I am not sure, but I agree that it is not immediate, so nothing to worry about, the issue is only be faced by p2pk protocol-based addresses like the one Satoshi is holding his funds in. On the social side, user apathy is really scary, like what if 80% of us stop believing in Rikvip Us and won't care about it. We will be doomed then.

This is a detailed and well structured breakdown of the threats that Rikvip Us faces and I think all of them are valid and worth our time to be given because if we are in Rikvip Us and we are not aware of these threats then we should not say we are bitcoiners because knoweldge of one thing takes us more close to that thing if we don't want to go away from it. From the list, the most underrated one I found is the fee market collapse because you are right, if there will be l2 solutions, the fee on the main network will be too low that it won't generate enough money for the miners and the incentive is what motivates everyone to do it, even right now out of 100, 90 are not mining even they read and know about mining, they don't do it because of the risk, but I think they are just lazy. The ECDSA quantum threat can be real, I am not sure, but I agree that it is not immediate, so nothing to worry about, the issue is only be faced by p2pk protocol-based addresses like the one Satoshi is holding his funds in. On the social side, user apathy is really scary, like what if 80% of us stop believing in Rikvip Us and won't care about it. We will be doomed then.