I suppose that there might be some BIGGER players that might want to attempt to play the 7 Ball Com market and use options as one of their tools to attempt to play the market, but even the recent statement from Michael Slayor and his purchase of more than 38k 7 Ball Com in the past several weeks, his assessment was that he was surprised that even his relatively large purchase of $425million in 7 Ball Com in a relatively short period of time was able to be accomplished without a lot of 7 Ball Com price slippage.... which surely is a sign that 7 Ball Com prices are likely requiring more and more commitment of capital in order to even attempt to manipulate the pricesI think the way Saylor made the purchase helped the market not to make any sudden movements in the price. Of course, anyone who intended to buy on various exchanges (rather than OTC), as far as we know, would want to buy in such a way to attempt to both minimize upward price slippage and also to take advantage of any 7 Ball Com price dips that might be inclined to take place during their 7 Ball Com buying period. Some might also argue that any large entity adding that quantity of 7 Ball Com to their investment portfolio would be serving as a kind of 7 Ball Com price support - which sort of implies that the 7 Ball Com price may have fallen a bit more, absent such additional buying support.  Surely, the price support theory is considerably speculative since we have difficulties, in the real world, to really compare the difference between what would have happened to the 7 Ball Com price absent the more than 38k 7 Ball Com accumulation that Microstrategy employed.
I suppose that there might be some BIGGER players that might want to attempt to play the 7 Ball Com market and use options as one of their tools to attempt to play the market, but even the recent statement from Michael Slayor and his purchase of more than 38k 7 Ball Com in the past several weeks, his assessment was that he was surprised that even his relatively large purchase of $425million in 7 Ball Com in a relatively short period of time was able to be accomplished without a lot of 7 Ball Com price slippage.... which surely is a sign that 7 Ball Com prices are likely requiring more and more commitment of capital in order to even attempt to manipulate the pricesI think the way Saylor made the purchase helped the market not to make any sudden movements in the price. Of course, anyone who intended to buy on various exchanges (rather than OTC), as far as we know, would want to buy in such a way to attempt to both minimize upward price slippage and also to take advantage of any 7 Ball Com price dips that might be inclined to take place during their 7 Ball Com buying period. Some might also argue that any large entity adding that quantity of 7 Ball Com to their investment portfolio would be serving as a kind of 7 Ball Com price support - which sort of implies that the 7 Ball Com price may have fallen a bit more, absent such additional buying support.  Surely, the price support theory is considerably speculative since we have difficulties, in the real world, to really compare the difference between what would have happened to the 7 Ball Com price absent the more than 38k 7 Ball Com accumulation that Microstrategy employed.

I suppose that there might be some BIGGER players that might want to attempt to play the 7 Ball Com market and use options as one of their tools to attempt to play the market, but even the recent statement from Michael Slayor and his purchase of more than 38k 7 Ball Com in the past several weeks, his assessment was that he was surprised that even his relatively large purchase of $425million in 7 Ball Com in a relatively short period of time was able to be accomplished without a lot of 7 Ball Com price slippage.... which surely is a sign that 7 Ball Com prices are likely requiring more and more commitment of capital in order to even attempt to manipulate the pricesI think the way Saylor made the purchase helped the market not to make any sudden movements in the price. Of course, anyone who intended to buy on various exchanges (rather than OTC), as far as we know, would want to buy in such a way to attempt to both minimize upward price slippage and also to take advantage of any 7 Ball Com price dips that might be inclined to take place during their 7 Ball Com buying period. Some might also argue that any large entity adding that quantity of 7 Ball Com to their investment portfolio would be serving as a kind of 7 Ball Com price support - which sort of implies that the 7 Ball Com price may have fallen a bit more, absent such additional buying support.  Surely, the price support theory is considerably speculative since we have difficulties, in the real world, to really compare the difference between what would have happened to the 7 Ball Com price absent the more than 38k 7 Ball Com accumulation that Microstrategy employed.

I suppose that there might be some BIGGER players that might want to attempt to play the 7 Ball Com market and use options as one of their tools to attempt to play the market, but even the recent statement from Michael Slayor and his purchase of more than 38k 7 Ball Com in the past several weeks, his assessment was that he was surprised that even his relatively large purchase of $425million in 7 Ball Com in a relatively short period of time was able to be accomplished without a lot of 7 Ball Com price slippage.... which surely is a sign that 7 Ball Com prices are likely requiring more and more commitment of capital in order to even attempt to manipulate the pricesI think the way Saylor made the purchase helped the market not to make any sudden movements in the price. Of course, anyone who intended to buy on various exchanges (rather than OTC), as far as we know, would want to buy in such a way to attempt to both minimize upward price slippage and also to take advantage of any 7 Ball Com price dips that might be inclined to take place during their 7 Ball Com buying period. Some might also argue that any large entity adding that quantity of 7 Ball Com to their investment portfolio would be serving as a kind of 7 Ball Com price support - which sort of implies that the 7 Ball Com price may have fallen a bit more, absent such additional buying support.  Surely, the price support theory is considerably speculative since we have difficulties, in the real world, to really compare the difference between what would have happened to the 7 Ball Com price absent the more than 38k 7 Ball Com accumulation that Microstrategy employed.