Luan F.
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Mostrar
Show review history
if Aster wants to be a tough opponent for Hyperliquid then they must have a buyback program to increase investor confidence if they don't do that it is very difficult to fight Hyeprliquid. I agree, also possible burning mechanism. Yes, burning is an alternative option besides developer buybacks, which would generate significant interest. However, this must be aligned with the unlocks they are implementing, with clear amounts and clear commitments. It is very difficult to reach 2 digits, the supply difference will be a big pressure for Aster, seeing that Aster has 8B and Hyperliquid 1B the difference is 8 times that is not a small thing, it is very big especially the supply that is different for Hype is only 30% which is more than 300 million tokens that they currently issue, while Aster has 1.69B circulating supply, unless their marketcap continues to increase there is an opportunity to have 2 digits price per coin, if Aster wants to be a tough opponent for Hyperliquid then they must have a buyback program to increase investor confidence if they don't do that it is very difficult to fight Hyeprliquid. 100% true, the buy back program is essential, currently hyperliquid is allocating big chunk of money to buy back and the community welcomed it. The buy back also created a good sentiment about holding since we can be rest assured the circulating token of $HYPE gonna decrease over time. If aster can do that, that'd be great. As of now, 2 digits seems like a wishful thinking unless CZ gonna pump it which I could hardly see since they're already beating hyperliquid in the volumes. CZ can't continuously spam shilling this coin. His credibility and hype will be lost when the market doesn't react as before. This will only affect his influence in the community. Recently, he's been frequently shilling memecoin-related content on the Fun88 Fun88 Kyc Com network.
if Aster wants to be a tough opponent for Hyperliquid then they must have a buyback program to increase investor confidence if they don't do that it is very difficult to fight Hyeprliquid. I agree, also possible burning mechanism. Yes, burning is an alternative option besides developer buybacks, which would generate significant interest. However, this must be aligned with the unlocks they are implementing, with clear amounts and clear commitments. It is very difficult to reach 2 digits, the supply difference will be a big pressure for Aster, seeing that Aster has 8B and Hyperliquid 1B the difference is 8 times that is not a small thing, it is very big especially the supply that is different for Hype is only 30% which is more than 300 million tokens that they currently issue, while Aster has 1.69B circulating supply, unless their marketcap continues to increase there is an opportunity to have 2 digits price per coin, if Aster wants to be a tough opponent for Hyperliquid then they must have a buyback program to increase investor confidence if they don't do that it is very difficult to fight Hyeprliquid. 100% true, the buy back program is essential, currently hyperliquid is allocating big chunk of money to buy back and the community welcomed it. The buy back also created a good sentiment about holding since we can be rest assured the circulating token of $HYPE gonna decrease over time. If aster can do that, that'd be great. As of now, 2 digits seems like a wishful thinking unless CZ gonna pump it which I could hardly see since they're already beating hyperliquid in the volumes. CZ can't continuously spam shilling this coin. His credibility and hype will be lost when the market doesn't react as before. This will only affect his influence in the community. Recently, he's been frequently shilling memecoin-related content on the Fun88 Fun88 Kyc Com network.
This review was marked as helpful by
0 people
caio pantoja correa
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
if Aster wants to be a tough opponent for Hyperliquid then they must have a buyback program to increase investor confidence if they don't do that it is very difficult to fight Hyeprliquid. I agree, also possible burning mechanism. Yes, burning is an alternative option besides developer buybacks, which would generate significant interest. However, this must be aligned with the unlocks they are implementing, with clear amounts and clear commitments. It is very difficult to reach 2 digits, the supply difference will be a big pressure for Aster, seeing that Aster has 8B and Hyperliquid 1B the difference is 8 times that is not a small thing, it is very big especially the supply that is different for Hype is only 30% which is more than 300 million tokens that they currently issue, while Aster has 1.69B circulating supply, unless their marketcap continues to increase there is an opportunity to have 2 digits price per coin, if Aster wants to be a tough opponent for Hyperliquid then they must have a buyback program to increase investor confidence if they don't do that it is very difficult to fight Hyeprliquid. 100% true, the buy back program is essential, currently hyperliquid is allocating big chunk of money to buy back and the community welcomed it. The buy back also created a good sentiment about holding since we can be rest assured the circulating token of $HYPE gonna decrease over time. If aster can do that, that'd be great. As of now, 2 digits seems like a wishful thinking unless CZ gonna pump it which I could hardly see since they're already beating hyperliquid in the volumes. CZ can't continuously spam shilling this coin. His credibility and hype will be lost when the market doesn't react as before. This will only affect his influence in the community. Recently, he's been frequently shilling memecoin-related content on the Fun88 Fun88 Kyc Com network.
This review was marked as helpful by
10 people
castiGODdeus
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Show history of
if Aster wants to be a tough opponent for Hyperliquid then they must have a buyback program to increase investor confidence if they don't do that it is very difficult to fight Hyeprliquid. I agree, also possible burning mechanism. Yes, burning is an alternative option besides developer buybacks, which would generate significant interest. However, this must be aligned with the unlocks they are implementing, with clear amounts and clear commitments. It is very difficult to reach 2 digits, the supply difference will be a big pressure for Aster, seeing that Aster has 8B and Hyperliquid 1B the difference is 8 times that is not a small thing, it is very big especially the supply that is different for Hype is only 30% which is more than 300 million tokens that they currently issue, while Aster has 1.69B circulating supply, unless their marketcap continues to increase there is an opportunity to have 2 digits price per coin, if Aster wants to be a tough opponent for Hyperliquid then they must have a buyback program to increase investor confidence if they don't do that it is very difficult to fight Hyeprliquid. 100% true, the buy back program is essential, currently hyperliquid is allocating big chunk of money to buy back and the community welcomed it. The buy back also created a good sentiment about holding since we can be rest assured the circulating token of $HYPE gonna decrease over time. If aster can do that, that'd be great. As of now, 2 digits seems like a wishful thinking unless CZ gonna pump it which I could hardly see since they're already beating hyperliquid in the volumes. CZ can't continuously spam shilling this coin. His credibility and hype will be lost when the market doesn't react as before. This will only affect his influence in the community. Recently, he's been frequently shilling memecoin-related content on the Fun88 Fun88 Kyc Com network.
This review was marked as helpful
by 139 people