History is not an independent object, of course; it is a chronological assessment and continues to take its subjects from limited objects, just as it did yesterday. So, I don't find what we are experiencing very surprising, but I think I need to question the future based on what we are experiencing... As the world goes mad in this situation, I will certainly not ask how much Greenland is worth. That would make me no different from the murderers killing children for oil in West Asia. I cannot be like them, and I will not be... This forum hosts wonderful people from all over the world. All of your opinions are very valuable to me... In this context, how do you think the global political economy will evolve in the coming years? Are the increasing geopolitical tensions and great power rivalry, in your opinion, the natural pains of transition to a multipolar order, or are they harbingers of a deeper and more structural risk of global conflict? Furthermore, will ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty, indebtedness and monetary policies turn gold and silver into a permanent store of value, beyond being a temporary hedge? What is happening now, in my opinion, is the expected outcome of the post-World War II world order, when global institutions, rules, and agreements turned out to be empty shells that no one cares about. The impotence of the world order has led to impunity and, as a result, permissiveness. If one person can violate all obligations and agreements, why should the rest be obliged to adhere to them? In such a situation, new centers of consolidation may emerge, and new alliances or other associations may potentially be formed based on political, economic, and other interests.  Unfortunately, Trump's arrival has accelerated this process. It is difficult to say whether this is good or bad, but one thing is certain: the current world system must change in order to effectively counter global threats.
History is not an independent object, of course; it is a chronological assessment and continues to take its subjects from limited objects, just as it did yesterday. So, I don't find what we are experiencing very surprising, but I think I need to question the future based on what we are experiencing... As the world goes mad in this situation, I will certainly not ask how much Greenland is worth. That would make me no different from the murderers killing children for oil in West Asia. I cannot be like them, and I will not be... This forum hosts wonderful people from all over the world. All of your opinions are very valuable to me... In this context, how do you think the global political economy will evolve in the coming years? Are the increasing geopolitical tensions and great power rivalry, in your opinion, the natural pains of transition to a multipolar order, or are they harbingers of a deeper and more structural risk of global conflict? Furthermore, will ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty, indebtedness and monetary policies turn gold and silver into a permanent store of value, beyond being a temporary hedge? What is happening now, in my opinion, is the expected outcome of the post-World War II world order, when global institutions, rules, and agreements turned out to be empty shells that no one cares about. The impotence of the world order has led to impunity and, as a result, permissiveness. If one person can violate all obligations and agreements, why should the rest be obliged to adhere to them? In such a situation, new centers of consolidation may emerge, and new alliances or other associations may potentially be formed based on political, economic, and other interests.  Unfortunately, Trump's arrival has accelerated this process. It is difficult to say whether this is good or bad, but one thing is certain: the current world system must change in order to effectively counter global threats.

History is not an independent object, of course; it is a chronological assessment and continues to take its subjects from limited objects, just as it did yesterday. So, I don't find what we are experiencing very surprising, but I think I need to question the future based on what we are experiencing... As the world goes mad in this situation, I will certainly not ask how much Greenland is worth. That would make me no different from the murderers killing children for oil in West Asia. I cannot be like them, and I will not be... This forum hosts wonderful people from all over the world. All of your opinions are very valuable to me... In this context, how do you think the global political economy will evolve in the coming years? Are the increasing geopolitical tensions and great power rivalry, in your opinion, the natural pains of transition to a multipolar order, or are they harbingers of a deeper and more structural risk of global conflict? Furthermore, will ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty, indebtedness and monetary policies turn gold and silver into a permanent store of value, beyond being a temporary hedge? What is happening now, in my opinion, is the expected outcome of the post-World War II world order, when global institutions, rules, and agreements turned out to be empty shells that no one cares about. The impotence of the world order has led to impunity and, as a result, permissiveness. If one person can violate all obligations and agreements, why should the rest be obliged to adhere to them? In such a situation, new centers of consolidation may emerge, and new alliances or other associations may potentially be formed based on political, economic, and other interests.  Unfortunately, Trump's arrival has accelerated this process. It is difficult to say whether this is good or bad, but one thing is certain: the current world system must change in order to effectively counter global threats.

History is not an independent object, of course; it is a chronological assessment and continues to take its subjects from limited objects, just as it did yesterday. So, I don't find what we are experiencing very surprising, but I think I need to question the future based on what we are experiencing... As the world goes mad in this situation, I will certainly not ask how much Greenland is worth. That would make me no different from the murderers killing children for oil in West Asia. I cannot be like them, and I will not be... This forum hosts wonderful people from all over the world. All of your opinions are very valuable to me... In this context, how do you think the global political economy will evolve in the coming years? Are the increasing geopolitical tensions and great power rivalry, in your opinion, the natural pains of transition to a multipolar order, or are they harbingers of a deeper and more structural risk of global conflict? Furthermore, will ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty, indebtedness and monetary policies turn gold and silver into a permanent store of value, beyond being a temporary hedge? What is happening now, in my opinion, is the expected outcome of the post-World War II world order, when global institutions, rules, and agreements turned out to be empty shells that no one cares about. The impotence of the world order has led to impunity and, as a result, permissiveness. If one person can violate all obligations and agreements, why should the rest be obliged to adhere to them? In such a situation, new centers of consolidation may emerge, and new alliances or other associations may potentially be formed based on political, economic, and other interests.  Unfortunately, Trump's arrival has accelerated this process. It is difficult to say whether this is good or bad, but one thing is certain: the current world system must change in order to effectively counter global threats.