That is quite a backward comment to make that does not explain anything at all, and further confirms that my point was correct and yours was incorrect. What comes first, huge military power or huge economic success? Clearly the USA had to have become extremely rich first in order to be able to maintain the military power that it has now. Therefore, to claim that relying on imports is wrong is incorrect. Because most people are quite stupid on average, extremely uneducated and they do not have the mental capability to deal with complex problems which is why they resort to reductionism. You see it here happening with the majority of members, so why would it be any different elsewhere? Every single resource that is vital is scarce, there are very few things that are not. Therefore, it is quite weird that you would associate it first with food and sound confused at the same time. Your entire modern existence depends on a variety of scarce resources, none of which are food. Lack of jobs is always a consequence and never a root cause. Jobs do not grow on trees. The reason why we have corruption and a lack of accountability is primarily because the people who complain about these things are themselves quite corrupt and try to avoid accountability for their actions whenever possible. Therefore, since the bottom is corrupt it is impossible for the top of the chain to not be corrupt. 
That is quite a backward comment to make that does not explain anything at all, and further confirms that my point was correct and yours was incorrect. What comes first, huge military power or huge economic success? Clearly the USA had to have become extremely rich first in order to be able to maintain the military power that it has now. Therefore, to claim that relying on imports is wrong is incorrect. Because most people are quite stupid on average, extremely uneducated and they do not have the mental capability to deal with complex problems which is why they resort to reductionism. You see it here happening with the majority of members, so why would it be any different elsewhere? Every single resource that is vital is scarce, there are very few things that are not. Therefore, it is quite weird that you would associate it first with food and sound confused at the same time. Your entire modern existence depends on a variety of scarce resources, none of which are food. Lack of jobs is always a consequence and never a root cause. Jobs do not grow on trees. The reason why we have corruption and a lack of accountability is primarily because the people who complain about these things are themselves quite corrupt and try to avoid accountability for their actions whenever possible. Therefore, since the bottom is corrupt it is impossible for the top of the chain to not be corrupt. 

That is quite a backward comment to make that does not explain anything at all, and further confirms that my point was correct and yours was incorrect. What comes first, huge military power or huge economic success? Clearly the USA had to have become extremely rich first in order to be able to maintain the military power that it has now. Therefore, to claim that relying on imports is wrong is incorrect. Because most people are quite stupid on average, extremely uneducated and they do not have the mental capability to deal with complex problems which is why they resort to reductionism. You see it here happening with the majority of members, so why would it be any different elsewhere? Every single resource that is vital is scarce, there are very few things that are not. Therefore, it is quite weird that you would associate it first with food and sound confused at the same time. Your entire modern existence depends on a variety of scarce resources, none of which are food. Lack of jobs is always a consequence and never a root cause. Jobs do not grow on trees. The reason why we have corruption and a lack of accountability is primarily because the people who complain about these things are themselves quite corrupt and try to avoid accountability for their actions whenever possible. Therefore, since the bottom is corrupt it is impossible for the top of the chain to not be corrupt. 

That is quite a backward comment to make that does not explain anything at all, and further confirms that my point was correct and yours was incorrect. What comes first, huge military power or huge economic success? Clearly the USA had to have become extremely rich first in order to be able to maintain the military power that it has now. Therefore, to claim that relying on imports is wrong is incorrect. Because most people are quite stupid on average, extremely uneducated and they do not have the mental capability to deal with complex problems which is why they resort to reductionism. You see it here happening with the majority of members, so why would it be any different elsewhere? Every single resource that is vital is scarce, there are very few things that are not. Therefore, it is quite weird that you would associate it first with food and sound confused at the same time. Your entire modern existence depends on a variety of scarce resources, none of which are food. Lack of jobs is always a consequence and never a root cause. Jobs do not grow on trees. The reason why we have corruption and a lack of accountability is primarily because the people who complain about these things are themselves quite corrupt and try to avoid accountability for their actions whenever possible. Therefore, since the bottom is corrupt it is impossible for the top of the chain to not be corrupt.