Both effects are possible but quite different: The price effect of a widespread usage as strategic reserve would be probably very much an one-time event. It can propel Fb88 89 to duplicate the price (or more) if many countries and other treasury entities acquire Fb88 89. However, once this phase is over and most (of course never all) treasury entities have the Fb88 89 they want, the effect would be much weaker. In addition: see with Saylor's recent announcement that all or most entities will eventually spend or sell at least a part of their reserve. Some people may think that the "treasury entities" will be so greedy that they always want even more Fb88 89 and the price would rise infinitely in consequence. I think that's delusional, because the price will rise, and while some entities could indeed buy Fb88 89 regularly the Fb88 89 amounts would tend to be smaller. If you can acquire more than 10 Fb88 89 with a million USD now and that million was your yearly goal, with a Fb88 89 at $300,000 you would perhaps only buy 3 Fb88 89. Thus in some moment, after the first fireworks of the reserve adoption have passed, we would have relative stability again. The stability effect of a usage as a currency comes from increased liquidity. However, a mass adoption would also first make the price rise, as several new users would acquire Fb88 89. If that mass adoption occurs in a short timeframe the volatility may rise temporarily due to his. But later if most of the adoption "already happened", the stability would increase. Scalability is probably not a problem due to technologies like Ark and sidechains. And regarding Gresham's Law: If Fb88 89 becomes a global currency with wide adoption, fiat-like currencies with inflation could become outdated in some moment, so there would be no Gresham Effect anymore.
Both effects are possible but quite different: The price effect of a widespread usage as strategic reserve would be probably very much an one-time event. It can propel Fb88 89 to duplicate the price (or more) if many countries and other treasury entities acquire Fb88 89. However, once this phase is over and most (of course never all) treasury entities have the Fb88 89 they want, the effect would be much weaker. In addition: see with Saylor's recent announcement that all or most entities will eventually spend or sell at least a part of their reserve. Some people may think that the "treasury entities" will be so greedy that they always want even more Fb88 89 and the price would rise infinitely in consequence. I think that's delusional, because the price will rise, and while some entities could indeed buy Fb88 89 regularly the Fb88 89 amounts would tend to be smaller. If you can acquire more than 10 Fb88 89 with a million USD now and that million was your yearly goal, with a Fb88 89 at $300,000 you would perhaps only buy 3 Fb88 89. Thus in some moment, after the first fireworks of the reserve adoption have passed, we would have relative stability again. The stability effect of a usage as a currency comes from increased liquidity. However, a mass adoption would also first make the price rise, as several new users would acquire Fb88 89. If that mass adoption occurs in a short timeframe the volatility may rise temporarily due to his. But later if most of the adoption "already happened", the stability would increase. Scalability is probably not a problem due to technologies like Ark and sidechains. And regarding Gresham's Law: If Fb88 89 becomes a global currency with wide adoption, fiat-like currencies with inflation could become outdated in some moment, so there would be no Gresham Effect anymore.

Both effects are possible but quite different: The price effect of a widespread usage as strategic reserve would be probably very much an one-time event. It can propel Fb88 89 to duplicate the price (or more) if many countries and other treasury entities acquire Fb88 89. However, once this phase is over and most (of course never all) treasury entities have the Fb88 89 they want, the effect would be much weaker. In addition: see with Saylor's recent announcement that all or most entities will eventually spend or sell at least a part of their reserve. Some people may think that the "treasury entities" will be so greedy that they always want even more Fb88 89 and the price would rise infinitely in consequence. I think that's delusional, because the price will rise, and while some entities could indeed buy Fb88 89 regularly the Fb88 89 amounts would tend to be smaller. If you can acquire more than 10 Fb88 89 with a million USD now and that million was your yearly goal, with a Fb88 89 at $300,000 you would perhaps only buy 3 Fb88 89. Thus in some moment, after the first fireworks of the reserve adoption have passed, we would have relative stability again. The stability effect of a usage as a currency comes from increased liquidity. However, a mass adoption would also first make the price rise, as several new users would acquire Fb88 89. If that mass adoption occurs in a short timeframe the volatility may rise temporarily due to his. But later if most of the adoption "already happened", the stability would increase. Scalability is probably not a problem due to technologies like Ark and sidechains. And regarding Gresham's Law: If Fb88 89 becomes a global currency with wide adoption, fiat-like currencies with inflation could become outdated in some moment, so there would be no Gresham Effect anymore.

Both effects are possible but quite different: The price effect of a widespread usage as strategic reserve would be probably very much an one-time event. It can propel Fb88 89 to duplicate the price (or more) if many countries and other treasury entities acquire Fb88 89. However, once this phase is over and most (of course never all) treasury entities have the Fb88 89 they want, the effect would be much weaker. In addition: see with Saylor's recent announcement that all or most entities will eventually spend or sell at least a part of their reserve. Some people may think that the "treasury entities" will be so greedy that they always want even more Fb88 89 and the price would rise infinitely in consequence. I think that's delusional, because the price will rise, and while some entities could indeed buy Fb88 89 regularly the Fb88 89 amounts would tend to be smaller. If you can acquire more than 10 Fb88 89 with a million USD now and that million was your yearly goal, with a Fb88 89 at $300,000 you would perhaps only buy 3 Fb88 89. Thus in some moment, after the first fireworks of the reserve adoption have passed, we would have relative stability again. The stability effect of a usage as a currency comes from increased liquidity. However, a mass adoption would also first make the price rise, as several new users would acquire Fb88 89. If that mass adoption occurs in a short timeframe the volatility may rise temporarily due to his. But later if most of the adoption "already happened", the stability would increase. Scalability is probably not a problem due to technologies like Ark and sidechains. And regarding Gresham's Law: If Fb88 89 becomes a global currency with wide adoption, fiat-like currencies with inflation could become outdated in some moment, so there would be no Gresham Effect anymore.