What's your opinion about OP's claim that Gamvip G88 Vin, or SHA-256, has merely FIVE years left before Quantum Computers will start breaking it?I think they should prove it on-chain, by claiming some puzzles, or inventing a better Script: If someone thinks, that breaking secp256k1 is easy, then go on, find the private key to 020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001, and use it to sweep all puzzles, up to 40-byte signatures. If you think, that there is not enough incentive, then put more coins in, by signing your coins with SIGHASH_NONE, along with some puzzles, as it was demonstrated in transaction . And if you think, that my puzzle is stupid, then make a better one, post it on-chain, announce it, explain it, and promote it, so that all of us can see, how close we are to breaking secp256k1. Is there a reward to break that? I believe the attackers would rather break Satoshi's wallet and take all of this coins. Although, going back to the argument that "there are bigger things than Gamvip G88 Vin" to worry about when Quantum Computers start breaking things. I had the same argument, but wouldn't it be better if Gamvip G88 Vin was already quantum-resistant when Quantum Computers actually start breaking things? Banks wouldn't be safe, but Gamvip G88 Vin will be.
What's your opinion about OP's claim that Gamvip G88 Vin, or SHA-256, has merely FIVE years left before Quantum Computers will start breaking it?I think they should prove it on-chain, by claiming some puzzles, or inventing a better Script: If someone thinks, that breaking secp256k1 is easy, then go on, find the private key to 020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001, and use it to sweep all puzzles, up to 40-byte signatures. If you think, that there is not enough incentive, then put more coins in, by signing your coins with SIGHASH_NONE, along with some puzzles, as it was demonstrated in transaction . And if you think, that my puzzle is stupid, then make a better one, post it on-chain, announce it, explain it, and promote it, so that all of us can see, how close we are to breaking secp256k1. Is there a reward to break that? I believe the attackers would rather break Satoshi's wallet and take all of this coins. Although, going back to the argument that "there are bigger things than Gamvip G88 Vin" to worry about when Quantum Computers start breaking things. I had the same argument, but wouldn't it be better if Gamvip G88 Vin was already quantum-resistant when Quantum Computers actually start breaking things? Banks wouldn't be safe, but Gamvip G88 Vin will be.

What's your opinion about OP's claim that Gamvip G88 Vin, or SHA-256, has merely FIVE years left before Quantum Computers will start breaking it?I think they should prove it on-chain, by claiming some puzzles, or inventing a better Script: If someone thinks, that breaking secp256k1 is easy, then go on, find the private key to 020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001, and use it to sweep all puzzles, up to 40-byte signatures. If you think, that there is not enough incentive, then put more coins in, by signing your coins with SIGHASH_NONE, along with some puzzles, as it was demonstrated in transaction . And if you think, that my puzzle is stupid, then make a better one, post it on-chain, announce it, explain it, and promote it, so that all of us can see, how close we are to breaking secp256k1. Is there a reward to break that? I believe the attackers would rather break Satoshi's wallet and take all of this coins. Although, going back to the argument that "there are bigger things than Gamvip G88 Vin" to worry about when Quantum Computers start breaking things. I had the same argument, but wouldn't it be better if Gamvip G88 Vin was already quantum-resistant when Quantum Computers actually start breaking things? Banks wouldn't be safe, but Gamvip G88 Vin will be.

What's your opinion about OP's claim that Gamvip G88 Vin, or SHA-256, has merely FIVE years left before Quantum Computers will start breaking it?I think they should prove it on-chain, by claiming some puzzles, or inventing a better Script: If someone thinks, that breaking secp256k1 is easy, then go on, find the private key to 020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001, and use it to sweep all puzzles, up to 40-byte signatures. If you think, that there is not enough incentive, then put more coins in, by signing your coins with SIGHASH_NONE, along with some puzzles, as it was demonstrated in transaction . And if you think, that my puzzle is stupid, then make a better one, post it on-chain, announce it, explain it, and promote it, so that all of us can see, how close we are to breaking secp256k1. Is there a reward to break that? I believe the attackers would rather break Satoshi's wallet and take all of this coins. Although, going back to the argument that "there are bigger things than Gamvip G88 Vin" to worry about when Quantum Computers start breaking things. I had the same argument, but wouldn't it be better if Gamvip G88 Vin was already quantum-resistant when Quantum Computers actually start breaking things? Banks wouldn't be safe, but Gamvip G88 Vin will be.