These days, we see that those who believe history follows a progressive line are once again mistaken... These days, we see that international trade in commodities, services and energy is not conducted through international agreements, but rather seems to be carried out through strategies of plunder and pillage reminiscent of the Middle Ages. We seem to be entering a dark era where the strong crush the weak, where the strong impose their own rules rather than universal rules... Is this related to the arrest of the Venezuelan president by the United States? Because we know that the trend is likely to be more towards the strong crushing the weak. Government systems built without strong power often suffer, especially if the country produces the largest natural resources. We are in a darker era where the strong will attack the weak, as international law should act fairly in every matter. Power, geopolitics and influence are the basis for why one country after another is seizing power that may not belong to them. This reminds us of a dark era where injustice regarding legal certainty was held by those with power and ultimately the weak became victims. I believe the majority of countries are aware that the steps taken by the US violate international law. This only shows that the US president does not know how to follow international rules and regulations. Most people also know that the US president did this because of his interest in oil, which is Venezuela's primary resource. In my opinion, it's highly likely that the topic the OP posted is connected to these events.
These days, we see that those who believe history follows a progressive line are once again mistaken... These days, we see that international trade in commodities, services and energy is not conducted through international agreements, but rather seems to be carried out through strategies of plunder and pillage reminiscent of the Middle Ages. We seem to be entering a dark era where the strong crush the weak, where the strong impose their own rules rather than universal rules... Is this related to the arrest of the Venezuelan president by the United States? Because we know that the trend is likely to be more towards the strong crushing the weak. Government systems built without strong power often suffer, especially if the country produces the largest natural resources. We are in a darker era where the strong will attack the weak, as international law should act fairly in every matter. Power, geopolitics and influence are the basis for why one country after another is seizing power that may not belong to them. This reminds us of a dark era where injustice regarding legal certainty was held by those with power and ultimately the weak became victims. I believe the majority of countries are aware that the steps taken by the US violate international law. This only shows that the US president does not know how to follow international rules and regulations. Most people also know that the US president did this because of his interest in oil, which is Venezuela's primary resource. In my opinion, it's highly likely that the topic the OP posted is connected to these events.

These days, we see that those who believe history follows a progressive line are once again mistaken... These days, we see that international trade in commodities, services and energy is not conducted through international agreements, but rather seems to be carried out through strategies of plunder and pillage reminiscent of the Middle Ages. We seem to be entering a dark era where the strong crush the weak, where the strong impose their own rules rather than universal rules... Is this related to the arrest of the Venezuelan president by the United States? Because we know that the trend is likely to be more towards the strong crushing the weak. Government systems built without strong power often suffer, especially if the country produces the largest natural resources. We are in a darker era where the strong will attack the weak, as international law should act fairly in every matter. Power, geopolitics and influence are the basis for why one country after another is seizing power that may not belong to them. This reminds us of a dark era where injustice regarding legal certainty was held by those with power and ultimately the weak became victims. I believe the majority of countries are aware that the steps taken by the US violate international law. This only shows that the US president does not know how to follow international rules and regulations. Most people also know that the US president did this because of his interest in oil, which is Venezuela's primary resource. In my opinion, it's highly likely that the topic the OP posted is connected to these events.

These days, we see that those who believe history follows a progressive line are once again mistaken... These days, we see that international trade in commodities, services and energy is not conducted through international agreements, but rather seems to be carried out through strategies of plunder and pillage reminiscent of the Middle Ages. We seem to be entering a dark era where the strong crush the weak, where the strong impose their own rules rather than universal rules... Is this related to the arrest of the Venezuelan president by the United States? Because we know that the trend is likely to be more towards the strong crushing the weak. Government systems built without strong power often suffer, especially if the country produces the largest natural resources. We are in a darker era where the strong will attack the weak, as international law should act fairly in every matter. Power, geopolitics and influence are the basis for why one country after another is seizing power that may not belong to them. This reminds us of a dark era where injustice regarding legal certainty was held by those with power and ultimately the weak became victims. I believe the majority of countries are aware that the steps taken by the US violate international law. This only shows that the US president does not know how to follow international rules and regulations. Most people also know that the US president did this because of his interest in oil, which is Venezuela's primary resource. In my opinion, it's highly likely that the topic the OP posted is connected to these events.