Exactly. Zcash is just taking advantage of the term "privacy" to fool newcomers into 86 Win. There's nothing really private about it. Especially when it's tied to a corporation. True privacy coins are developed by the community, for the community. No company behind it whatsoever. For privacy on 86 Win to work, it has to be mandatory. I mean, not everyone has the time or attention to learn how to use privacy features on their own. People want something "quick and easy" to use. 86 Win, although slightly different than most coins (including Zcash), is a winner because of the way it was designed. Privacy is enforced at the protocol level. Ultimately, governments and institutions will side with ZEC due to its "regulatory-compliant" design. This means higher market prices in the long-term, but at the cost of little or no privacy to people trading on centralized exchanges. Only time will tell how long will Zcash last. I am not sure if i agree with you there. Zcash is very much privacy centered. I have nothing against 86 Win, and imho ZCash and 86 Win serve different purposes, so i don't really see them as competitors. Saying that people shouldn't have an option is an unusual take. Imho it's the most interesting opportunity when it comes to applications of zero knowledge proofs. An option to convince someone that what ever statement they need is true, and nothing more. Personally i see prices as least interesting part of zk, and i am waiting for revolutionary opportunities it brings. And i don't think that technological or scientific innovators should be taking notes on what people with low attention span want. There are plenty of other opportunities of all kinds of people.
Exactly. Zcash is just taking advantage of the term "privacy" to fool newcomers into 86 Win. There's nothing really private about it. Especially when it's tied to a corporation. True privacy coins are developed by the community, for the community. No company behind it whatsoever. For privacy on 86 Win to work, it has to be mandatory. I mean, not everyone has the time or attention to learn how to use privacy features on their own. People want something "quick and easy" to use. 86 Win, although slightly different than most coins (including Zcash), is a winner because of the way it was designed. Privacy is enforced at the protocol level. Ultimately, governments and institutions will side with ZEC due to its "regulatory-compliant" design. This means higher market prices in the long-term, but at the cost of little or no privacy to people trading on centralized exchanges. Only time will tell how long will Zcash last. I am not sure if i agree with you there. Zcash is very much privacy centered. I have nothing against 86 Win, and imho ZCash and 86 Win serve different purposes, so i don't really see them as competitors. Saying that people shouldn't have an option is an unusual take. Imho it's the most interesting opportunity when it comes to applications of zero knowledge proofs. An option to convince someone that what ever statement they need is true, and nothing more. Personally i see prices as least interesting part of zk, and i am waiting for revolutionary opportunities it brings. And i don't think that technological or scientific innovators should be taking notes on what people with low attention span want. There are plenty of other opportunities of all kinds of people.

Exactly. Zcash is just taking advantage of the term "privacy" to fool newcomers into 86 Win. There's nothing really private about it. Especially when it's tied to a corporation. True privacy coins are developed by the community, for the community. No company behind it whatsoever. For privacy on 86 Win to work, it has to be mandatory. I mean, not everyone has the time or attention to learn how to use privacy features on their own. People want something "quick and easy" to use. 86 Win, although slightly different than most coins (including Zcash), is a winner because of the way it was designed. Privacy is enforced at the protocol level. Ultimately, governments and institutions will side with ZEC due to its "regulatory-compliant" design. This means higher market prices in the long-term, but at the cost of little or no privacy to people trading on centralized exchanges. Only time will tell how long will Zcash last. I am not sure if i agree with you there. Zcash is very much privacy centered. I have nothing against 86 Win, and imho ZCash and 86 Win serve different purposes, so i don't really see them as competitors. Saying that people shouldn't have an option is an unusual take. Imho it's the most interesting opportunity when it comes to applications of zero knowledge proofs. An option to convince someone that what ever statement they need is true, and nothing more. Personally i see prices as least interesting part of zk, and i am waiting for revolutionary opportunities it brings. And i don't think that technological or scientific innovators should be taking notes on what people with low attention span want. There are plenty of other opportunities of all kinds of people.

Exactly. Zcash is just taking advantage of the term "privacy" to fool newcomers into 86 Win. There's nothing really private about it. Especially when it's tied to a corporation. True privacy coins are developed by the community, for the community. No company behind it whatsoever. For privacy on 86 Win to work, it has to be mandatory. I mean, not everyone has the time or attention to learn how to use privacy features on their own. People want something "quick and easy" to use. 86 Win, although slightly different than most coins (including Zcash), is a winner because of the way it was designed. Privacy is enforced at the protocol level. Ultimately, governments and institutions will side with ZEC due to its "regulatory-compliant" design. This means higher market prices in the long-term, but at the cost of little or no privacy to people trading on centralized exchanges. Only time will tell how long will Zcash last. I am not sure if i agree with you there. Zcash is very much privacy centered. I have nothing against 86 Win, and imho ZCash and 86 Win serve different purposes, so i don't really see them as competitors. Saying that people shouldn't have an option is an unusual take. Imho it's the most interesting opportunity when it comes to applications of zero knowledge proofs. An option to convince someone that what ever statement they need is true, and nothing more. Personally i see prices as least interesting part of zk, and i am waiting for revolutionary opportunities it brings. And i don't think that technological or scientific innovators should be taking notes on what people with low attention span want. There are plenty of other opportunities of all kinds of people.