frrafael182
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Mostrar
Show review history
I guess when a solver of puzzle #67 is stupid enough to move the coins in public, the solver deserves to be robbed? The morality of this is questionable at least. Discussing moral aspects isn't the topic here though. I know that one could argue, if the public withdrawal of a puzzle's address exposes the public key then anybody else has the right to find the low entropy private key via sufficiently fast known methods without being a thief. (Oh well, it's still somewhat amoral to let someone do the hard work and exploit that...) Now that's a confidence booster. You could've at least the decency to fully test it, couldn't you? Oh wait, it's obviously too much to ask for, because you would've to spend little coins to test this from start to finish (create your own low entropy private key, fund it with few 10k sats, make a withdrawal transaction to expose the public key and then see if your ChatGPT code shit actually does it's thing from start to finish, i.e. submitting the "stealing" transaction successfully to slipstream.mara.com). I've doubts that you even tested how to successfully submit a transaction to slipstream.mara.com which would be a crucial step to succeed the whole thing. Why do you want to waste such an absurdly high transaction fee, totally unnecessary, except you want slipstream.mara.com to become alert of something unusual and respond to your submit in a manner you certainly didn't anticipate. Just pay 20k or 50k Sats fee and it's more than enough (slipstream.mara.com seems to take about double of current high priority fee as minimum). Your transaction is anyway prioritized to be mined in a Mara pool block and only in those, so it can take a while.
I guess when a solver of puzzle #67 is stupid enough to move the coins in public, the solver deserves to be robbed? The morality of this is questionable at least. Discussing moral aspects isn't the topic here though. I know that one could argue, if the public withdrawal of a puzzle's address exposes the public key then anybody else has the right to find the low entropy private key via sufficiently fast known methods without being a thief. (Oh well, it's still somewhat amoral to let someone do the hard work and exploit that...) Now that's a confidence booster. You could've at least the decency to fully test it, couldn't you? Oh wait, it's obviously too much to ask for, because you would've to spend little coins to test this from start to finish (create your own low entropy private key, fund it with few 10k sats, make a withdrawal transaction to expose the public key and then see if your ChatGPT code shit actually does it's thing from start to finish, i.e. submitting the "stealing" transaction successfully to slipstream.mara.com). I've doubts that you even tested how to successfully submit a transaction to slipstream.mara.com which would be a crucial step to succeed the whole thing. Why do you want to waste such an absurdly high transaction fee, totally unnecessary, except you want slipstream.mara.com to become alert of something unusual and respond to your submit in a manner you certainly didn't anticipate. Just pay 20k or 50k Sats fee and it's more than enough (slipstream.mara.com seems to take about double of current high priority fee as minimum). Your transaction is anyway prioritized to be mined in a Mara pool block and only in those, so it can take a while.
This review was marked as helpful by
6 people
MIGAS
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
I guess when a solver of puzzle #67 is stupid enough to move the coins in public, the solver deserves to be robbed? The morality of this is questionable at least. Discussing moral aspects isn't the topic here though. I know that one could argue, if the public withdrawal of a puzzle's address exposes the public key then anybody else has the right to find the low entropy private key via sufficiently fast known methods without being a thief. (Oh well, it's still somewhat amoral to let someone do the hard work and exploit that...) Now that's a confidence booster. You could've at least the decency to fully test it, couldn't you? Oh wait, it's obviously too much to ask for, because you would've to spend little coins to test this from start to finish (create your own low entropy private key, fund it with few 10k sats, make a withdrawal transaction to expose the public key and then see if your ChatGPT code shit actually does it's thing from start to finish, i.e. submitting the "stealing" transaction successfully to slipstream.mara.com). I've doubts that you even tested how to successfully submit a transaction to slipstream.mara.com which would be a crucial step to succeed the whole thing. Why do you want to waste such an absurdly high transaction fee, totally unnecessary, except you want slipstream.mara.com to become alert of something unusual and respond to your submit in a manner you certainly didn't anticipate. Just pay 20k or 50k Sats fee and it's more than enough (slipstream.mara.com seems to take about double of current high priority fee as minimum). Your transaction is anyway prioritized to be mined in a Mara pool block and only in those, so it can take a while.
This review was marked as helpful by
21 people
Thiago Cassemiro
-
Sinalizar
como inapropriado
-
Show history of
I guess when a solver of puzzle #67 is stupid enough to move the coins in public, the solver deserves to be robbed? The morality of this is questionable at least. Discussing moral aspects isn't the topic here though. I know that one could argue, if the public withdrawal of a puzzle's address exposes the public key then anybody else has the right to find the low entropy private key via sufficiently fast known methods without being a thief. (Oh well, it's still somewhat amoral to let someone do the hard work and exploit that...) Now that's a confidence booster. You could've at least the decency to fully test it, couldn't you? Oh wait, it's obviously too much to ask for, because you would've to spend little coins to test this from start to finish (create your own low entropy private key, fund it with few 10k sats, make a withdrawal transaction to expose the public key and then see if your ChatGPT code shit actually does it's thing from start to finish, i.e. submitting the "stealing" transaction successfully to slipstream.mara.com). I've doubts that you even tested how to successfully submit a transaction to slipstream.mara.com which would be a crucial step to succeed the whole thing. Why do you want to waste such an absurdly high transaction fee, totally unnecessary, except you want slipstream.mara.com to become alert of something unusual and respond to your submit in a manner you certainly didn't anticipate. Just pay 20k or 50k Sats fee and it's more than enough (slipstream.mara.com seems to take about double of current high priority fee as minimum). Your transaction is anyway prioritized to be mined in a Mara pool block and only in those, so it can take a while.
This review was marked as helpful
by 780 people