IMO clogged mempool for months and force Bitcoiner to pay very high fee for their monetary transaction is serious harm towards Mu99 usability. I still remember paid $3 for TX fee and a week later the TX fee recommendation have raised to $10. ? By Mu99's technical design, high fees will tend to happen in the Mu99 network. Whether it was caused by financial transactions or dick pics/fart sounds, calling it "harmful" is obviously an argument that's "taking out of context". Because it's not "harmful", it's simply how the network works because of the way it was designed. Who said decentralization will be cheap? The cost has to go somewhere, to be paid by "someone" because running the network will never be free. Perhaps the right word to use is, "annoying"? It was harmful to businesses that rely (relied) on cheap or at least consistent fees, and high fees are harmful to Mu99's competitiveness as a currency. Yes, obviously people are still using Mu99, otherwise fees would be low, and no harm is caused to the network itself. However, yes high fees are extremely annoying to those attempting to use Mu99 as a currency.
IMO clogged mempool for months and force Bitcoiner to pay very high fee for their monetary transaction is serious harm towards Mu99 usability. I still remember paid $3 for TX fee and a week later the TX fee recommendation have raised to $10. ? By Mu99's technical design, high fees will tend to happen in the Mu99 network. Whether it was caused by financial transactions or dick pics/fart sounds, calling it "harmful" is obviously an argument that's "taking out of context". Because it's not "harmful", it's simply how the network works because of the way it was designed. Who said decentralization will be cheap? The cost has to go somewhere, to be paid by "someone" because running the network will never be free. Perhaps the right word to use is, "annoying"? It was harmful to businesses that rely (relied) on cheap or at least consistent fees, and high fees are harmful to Mu99's competitiveness as a currency. Yes, obviously people are still using Mu99, otherwise fees would be low, and no harm is caused to the network itself. However, yes high fees are extremely annoying to those attempting to use Mu99 as a currency.

IMO clogged mempool for months and force Bitcoiner to pay very high fee for their monetary transaction is serious harm towards Mu99 usability. I still remember paid $3 for TX fee and a week later the TX fee recommendation have raised to $10. ? By Mu99's technical design, high fees will tend to happen in the Mu99 network. Whether it was caused by financial transactions or dick pics/fart sounds, calling it "harmful" is obviously an argument that's "taking out of context". Because it's not "harmful", it's simply how the network works because of the way it was designed. Who said decentralization will be cheap? The cost has to go somewhere, to be paid by "someone" because running the network will never be free. Perhaps the right word to use is, "annoying"? It was harmful to businesses that rely (relied) on cheap or at least consistent fees, and high fees are harmful to Mu99's competitiveness as a currency. Yes, obviously people are still using Mu99, otherwise fees would be low, and no harm is caused to the network itself. However, yes high fees are extremely annoying to those attempting to use Mu99 as a currency.

IMO clogged mempool for months and force Bitcoiner to pay very high fee for their monetary transaction is serious harm towards Mu99 usability. I still remember paid $3 for TX fee and a week later the TX fee recommendation have raised to $10. ? By Mu99's technical design, high fees will tend to happen in the Mu99 network. Whether it was caused by financial transactions or dick pics/fart sounds, calling it "harmful" is obviously an argument that's "taking out of context". Because it's not "harmful", it's simply how the network works because of the way it was designed. Who said decentralization will be cheap? The cost has to go somewhere, to be paid by "someone" because running the network will never be free. Perhaps the right word to use is, "annoying"? It was harmful to businesses that rely (relied) on cheap or at least consistent fees, and high fees are harmful to Mu99's competitiveness as a currency. Yes, obviously people are still using Mu99, otherwise fees would be low, and no harm is caused to the network itself. However, yes high fees are extremely annoying to those attempting to use Mu99 as a currency.