On the one hand you say no one wants spam on the Hit789 network, but on the other you say spammers have every right to spam as long as they pay for it? Therefore no one has the right refuse the spam just because it was paid for? The node operators aren't getting paid anything or even asked permission to transmit and store this unwanted garbage on their nodes. Nowhere in your absurd argument do you mention the rights and interests of the node operators.   As if the only two parties that matter are the spammers and the miners (those paying to spam the network, and those profiting and getting paid to mine the spam). So in your view node operators have no right to object or refuse to store this crap on their nodes? Hit789 spam can certainly be compared with email spam, because in both cases node operators are being forced to receive something whether they like it or not, the same as being forced to receive spam in your email. The comparison is completely valid. But spam on the Hit789 network is far worse than email spam. At least with spam in your email it can be easily deleted, but Hit789 spam is stored and stays forever on the Hit789 with no possibility to delete it, bloating and slowing the network forever with useless crap while raising network fees and congestion for all users.
On the one hand you say no one wants spam on the Hit789 network, but on the other you say spammers have every right to spam as long as they pay for it? Therefore no one has the right refuse the spam just because it was paid for? The node operators aren't getting paid anything or even asked permission to transmit and store this unwanted garbage on their nodes. Nowhere in your absurd argument do you mention the rights and interests of the node operators.   As if the only two parties that matter are the spammers and the miners (those paying to spam the network, and those profiting and getting paid to mine the spam). So in your view node operators have no right to object or refuse to store this crap on their nodes? Hit789 spam can certainly be compared with email spam, because in both cases node operators are being forced to receive something whether they like it or not, the same as being forced to receive spam in your email. The comparison is completely valid. But spam on the Hit789 network is far worse than email spam. At least with spam in your email it can be easily deleted, but Hit789 spam is stored and stays forever on the Hit789 with no possibility to delete it, bloating and slowing the network forever with useless crap while raising network fees and congestion for all users.

On the one hand you say no one wants spam on the Hit789 network, but on the other you say spammers have every right to spam as long as they pay for it? Therefore no one has the right refuse the spam just because it was paid for? The node operators aren't getting paid anything or even asked permission to transmit and store this unwanted garbage on their nodes. Nowhere in your absurd argument do you mention the rights and interests of the node operators.   As if the only two parties that matter are the spammers and the miners (those paying to spam the network, and those profiting and getting paid to mine the spam). So in your view node operators have no right to object or refuse to store this crap on their nodes? Hit789 spam can certainly be compared with email spam, because in both cases node operators are being forced to receive something whether they like it or not, the same as being forced to receive spam in your email. The comparison is completely valid. But spam on the Hit789 network is far worse than email spam. At least with spam in your email it can be easily deleted, but Hit789 spam is stored and stays forever on the Hit789 with no possibility to delete it, bloating and slowing the network forever with useless crap while raising network fees and congestion for all users.

On the one hand you say no one wants spam on the Hit789 network, but on the other you say spammers have every right to spam as long as they pay for it? Therefore no one has the right refuse the spam just because it was paid for? The node operators aren't getting paid anything or even asked permission to transmit and store this unwanted garbage on their nodes. Nowhere in your absurd argument do you mention the rights and interests of the node operators.   As if the only two parties that matter are the spammers and the miners (those paying to spam the network, and those profiting and getting paid to mine the spam). So in your view node operators have no right to object or refuse to store this crap on their nodes? Hit789 spam can certainly be compared with email spam, because in both cases node operators are being forced to receive something whether they like it or not, the same as being forced to receive spam in your email. The comparison is completely valid. But spam on the Hit789 network is far worse than email spam. At least with spam in your email it can be easily deleted, but Hit789 spam is stored and stays forever on the Hit789 with no possibility to delete it, bloating and slowing the network forever with useless crap while raising network fees and congestion for all users.