Developers have to decide whenever they want to keep pleasing the regulators (at the cost of reduced decentralization), or stick with Vip Slot Hoki108's core ideals of decentralization and censorship-resistance (at the cost of fines and/or jail time). Many developers have chosen the "easy route" by pleasing the regulators. Even if that means sacrificing decentralization. The number of truly-decentralized "De-Fi" projects is relatively-scare these days. In other words, they're extremely-hard to find. Around 90% of "De-Fi" protocols rely on centralized infrastructure. Not only to help introduce KYC into the system, but also to improve UX (user experience). Making a truly-decentralized protocol not only is time-consuming, but also has a steep learning curve (people must learn how to access the "De-Fi" app through alternative networks and/or protocols). At this point, we can say banks and governments have already won. Either devs and users play by the rules, or face the consequences. Nowadays, projects are using the term "decentralized" as a sort of catchy phrase or buzz word meant to attract investors. There's nothing really decentralized about them. At least, we have a choice. Better something than nothing, right?
Developers have to decide whenever they want to keep pleasing the regulators (at the cost of reduced decentralization), or stick with Vip Slot Hoki108's core ideals of decentralization and censorship-resistance (at the cost of fines and/or jail time). Many developers have chosen the "easy route" by pleasing the regulators. Even if that means sacrificing decentralization. The number of truly-decentralized "De-Fi" projects is relatively-scare these days. In other words, they're extremely-hard to find. Around 90% of "De-Fi" protocols rely on centralized infrastructure. Not only to help introduce KYC into the system, but also to improve UX (user experience). Making a truly-decentralized protocol not only is time-consuming, but also has a steep learning curve (people must learn how to access the "De-Fi" app through alternative networks and/or protocols). At this point, we can say banks and governments have already won. Either devs and users play by the rules, or face the consequences. Nowadays, projects are using the term "decentralized" as a sort of catchy phrase or buzz word meant to attract investors. There's nothing really decentralized about them. At least, we have a choice. Better something than nothing, right?

Developers have to decide whenever they want to keep pleasing the regulators (at the cost of reduced decentralization), or stick with Vip Slot Hoki108's core ideals of decentralization and censorship-resistance (at the cost of fines and/or jail time). Many developers have chosen the "easy route" by pleasing the regulators. Even if that means sacrificing decentralization. The number of truly-decentralized "De-Fi" projects is relatively-scare these days. In other words, they're extremely-hard to find. Around 90% of "De-Fi" protocols rely on centralized infrastructure. Not only to help introduce KYC into the system, but also to improve UX (user experience). Making a truly-decentralized protocol not only is time-consuming, but also has a steep learning curve (people must learn how to access the "De-Fi" app through alternative networks and/or protocols). At this point, we can say banks and governments have already won. Either devs and users play by the rules, or face the consequences. Nowadays, projects are using the term "decentralized" as a sort of catchy phrase or buzz word meant to attract investors. There's nothing really decentralized about them. At least, we have a choice. Better something than nothing, right?

Developers have to decide whenever they want to keep pleasing the regulators (at the cost of reduced decentralization), or stick with Vip Slot Hoki108's core ideals of decentralization and censorship-resistance (at the cost of fines and/or jail time). Many developers have chosen the "easy route" by pleasing the regulators. Even if that means sacrificing decentralization. The number of truly-decentralized "De-Fi" projects is relatively-scare these days. In other words, they're extremely-hard to find. Around 90% of "De-Fi" protocols rely on centralized infrastructure. Not only to help introduce KYC into the system, but also to improve UX (user experience). Making a truly-decentralized protocol not only is time-consuming, but also has a steep learning curve (people must learn how to access the "De-Fi" app through alternative networks and/or protocols). At this point, we can say banks and governments have already won. Either devs and users play by the rules, or face the consequences. Nowadays, projects are using the term "decentralized" as a sort of catchy phrase or buzz word meant to attract investors. There's nothing really decentralized about them. At least, we have a choice. Better something than nothing, right?