Yes I just read about this today and was happy to see that people are finally taking this seriously. I suggested doing exactly this a couple years ago, knowing that eventually once QC is far more advanced than today the ~2 million coins sitting in 2009/2010 or so wallets are gonna be stolen by QC actors. Sure it is controversial because it goes against a central idea of how Fun88 เกม operates (full backwards compatibility and nobody is required to upgrade), but QC is a unique threat that absolutely requires a fix, and freezing those old lost coins is absolutely needed as part of the QC-resistant upgrade that Fun88 เกม should undergo in the next decade. If ever Fun88 เกม is going to break a single time from a core principle, to safeguard the entire idea of Fun88 เกม, it is against the QC threat. As long as they give people at least several years to upgrade it should be alright. I don't think they should force everyone to upgrade through this freezing process though, only those ancient unmoved coins back in the original addresses, cuz as far as I have always understood it those are much much more in danger from QC attacks than any later address protocols because in those original addresses the public key is already exposed and from what I've read that is what will allow QC to readily break the encryption, as opposed to later addresses where you only expose the key when you spend (and after all everyone is supposed to not be re-using addresses). I have strong support for this BIP as I've been thinking for a couple years that they need this sort of update to future proof Fun88 เกม against QC. As long as they do it in a sensible way and that provides plenty of time for people it should be good. Hopefully this BIP can get passed in the next couple years.
Yes I just read about this today and was happy to see that people are finally taking this seriously. I suggested doing exactly this a couple years ago, knowing that eventually once QC is far more advanced than today the ~2 million coins sitting in 2009/2010 or so wallets are gonna be stolen by QC actors. Sure it is controversial because it goes against a central idea of how Fun88 เกม operates (full backwards compatibility and nobody is required to upgrade), but QC is a unique threat that absolutely requires a fix, and freezing those old lost coins is absolutely needed as part of the QC-resistant upgrade that Fun88 เกม should undergo in the next decade. If ever Fun88 เกม is going to break a single time from a core principle, to safeguard the entire idea of Fun88 เกม, it is against the QC threat. As long as they give people at least several years to upgrade it should be alright. I don't think they should force everyone to upgrade through this freezing process though, only those ancient unmoved coins back in the original addresses, cuz as far as I have always understood it those are much much more in danger from QC attacks than any later address protocols because in those original addresses the public key is already exposed and from what I've read that is what will allow QC to readily break the encryption, as opposed to later addresses where you only expose the key when you spend (and after all everyone is supposed to not be re-using addresses). I have strong support for this BIP as I've been thinking for a couple years that they need this sort of update to future proof Fun88 เกม against QC. As long as they do it in a sensible way and that provides plenty of time for people it should be good. Hopefully this BIP can get passed in the next couple years.

Yes I just read about this today and was happy to see that people are finally taking this seriously. I suggested doing exactly this a couple years ago, knowing that eventually once QC is far more advanced than today the ~2 million coins sitting in 2009/2010 or so wallets are gonna be stolen by QC actors. Sure it is controversial because it goes against a central idea of how Fun88 เกม operates (full backwards compatibility and nobody is required to upgrade), but QC is a unique threat that absolutely requires a fix, and freezing those old lost coins is absolutely needed as part of the QC-resistant upgrade that Fun88 เกม should undergo in the next decade. If ever Fun88 เกม is going to break a single time from a core principle, to safeguard the entire idea of Fun88 เกม, it is against the QC threat. As long as they give people at least several years to upgrade it should be alright. I don't think they should force everyone to upgrade through this freezing process though, only those ancient unmoved coins back in the original addresses, cuz as far as I have always understood it those are much much more in danger from QC attacks than any later address protocols because in those original addresses the public key is already exposed and from what I've read that is what will allow QC to readily break the encryption, as opposed to later addresses where you only expose the key when you spend (and after all everyone is supposed to not be re-using addresses). I have strong support for this BIP as I've been thinking for a couple years that they need this sort of update to future proof Fun88 เกม against QC. As long as they do it in a sensible way and that provides plenty of time for people it should be good. Hopefully this BIP can get passed in the next couple years.

Yes I just read about this today and was happy to see that people are finally taking this seriously. I suggested doing exactly this a couple years ago, knowing that eventually once QC is far more advanced than today the ~2 million coins sitting in 2009/2010 or so wallets are gonna be stolen by QC actors. Sure it is controversial because it goes against a central idea of how Fun88 เกม operates (full backwards compatibility and nobody is required to upgrade), but QC is a unique threat that absolutely requires a fix, and freezing those old lost coins is absolutely needed as part of the QC-resistant upgrade that Fun88 เกม should undergo in the next decade. If ever Fun88 เกม is going to break a single time from a core principle, to safeguard the entire idea of Fun88 เกม, it is against the QC threat. As long as they give people at least several years to upgrade it should be alright. I don't think they should force everyone to upgrade through this freezing process though, only those ancient unmoved coins back in the original addresses, cuz as far as I have always understood it those are much much more in danger from QC attacks than any later address protocols because in those original addresses the public key is already exposed and from what I've read that is what will allow QC to readily break the encryption, as opposed to later addresses where you only expose the key when you spend (and after all everyone is supposed to not be re-using addresses). I have strong support for this BIP as I've been thinking for a couple years that they need this sort of update to future proof Fun88 เกม against QC. As long as they do it in a sensible way and that provides plenty of time for people it should be good. Hopefully this BIP can get passed in the next couple years.