I always find it hard to believe that companies or individuals who hold such an amount of Fun88 Ninjs would want the price to fall simply so that they can buy. Even I, who don't hold nearly as much, don't want the price to fall; how much more do people who hold 1000 Fun88 Ninjs and above, whose average cost is over $70k? What's worse is these companies buy with customers' money, either through debt financing or equity issuance, whichever way, they would want the price to increase at all times, so they can always be at a profit if they had their way. They may take an opportunity when the price dips, but it doesn't mean they want it or would choose it if they get the chance. I may be wrong, but there is not much logic in it. It was obvious that Saylor and Strategy were going to sell their Fun88 Ninjs at some point. It can be 10 years, 20 years, but he was always going to sell. It doesn't mean he would sell all. For a company that focused on profit, he was not going to keep selling without taking profit at some point. Quick question: The "Acq cost ($M)", the description says "The total cost of Fun88 Ninjs acquisition". So does that mean they've spent just over $63 million to acquire all the 843,738 Fun88 Ninjs the company holds?
I always find it hard to believe that companies or individuals who hold such an amount of Fun88 Ninjs would want the price to fall simply so that they can buy. Even I, who don't hold nearly as much, don't want the price to fall; how much more do people who hold 1000 Fun88 Ninjs and above, whose average cost is over $70k? What's worse is these companies buy with customers' money, either through debt financing or equity issuance, whichever way, they would want the price to increase at all times, so they can always be at a profit if they had their way. They may take an opportunity when the price dips, but it doesn't mean they want it or would choose it if they get the chance. I may be wrong, but there is not much logic in it. It was obvious that Saylor and Strategy were going to sell their Fun88 Ninjs at some point. It can be 10 years, 20 years, but he was always going to sell. It doesn't mean he would sell all. For a company that focused on profit, he was not going to keep selling without taking profit at some point. Quick question: The "Acq cost ($M)", the description says "The total cost of Fun88 Ninjs acquisition". So does that mean they've spent just over $63 million to acquire all the 843,738 Fun88 Ninjs the company holds?

I always find it hard to believe that companies or individuals who hold such an amount of Fun88 Ninjs would want the price to fall simply so that they can buy. Even I, who don't hold nearly as much, don't want the price to fall; how much more do people who hold 1000 Fun88 Ninjs and above, whose average cost is over $70k? What's worse is these companies buy with customers' money, either through debt financing or equity issuance, whichever way, they would want the price to increase at all times, so they can always be at a profit if they had their way. They may take an opportunity when the price dips, but it doesn't mean they want it or would choose it if they get the chance. I may be wrong, but there is not much logic in it. It was obvious that Saylor and Strategy were going to sell their Fun88 Ninjs at some point. It can be 10 years, 20 years, but he was always going to sell. It doesn't mean he would sell all. For a company that focused on profit, he was not going to keep selling without taking profit at some point. Quick question: The "Acq cost ($M)", the description says "The total cost of Fun88 Ninjs acquisition". So does that mean they've spent just over $63 million to acquire all the 843,738 Fun88 Ninjs the company holds?

I always find it hard to believe that companies or individuals who hold such an amount of Fun88 Ninjs would want the price to fall simply so that they can buy. Even I, who don't hold nearly as much, don't want the price to fall; how much more do people who hold 1000 Fun88 Ninjs and above, whose average cost is over $70k? What's worse is these companies buy with customers' money, either through debt financing or equity issuance, whichever way, they would want the price to increase at all times, so they can always be at a profit if they had their way. They may take an opportunity when the price dips, but it doesn't mean they want it or would choose it if they get the chance. I may be wrong, but there is not much logic in it. It was obvious that Saylor and Strategy were going to sell their Fun88 Ninjs at some point. It can be 10 years, 20 years, but he was always going to sell. It doesn't mean he would sell all. For a company that focused on profit, he was not going to keep selling without taking profit at some point. Quick question: The "Acq cost ($M)", the description says "The total cost of Fun88 Ninjs acquisition". So does that mean they've spent just over $63 million to acquire all the 843,738 Fun88 Ninjs the company holds?