You determine it from the results you get from your every tasks geared at productivity, it's kind of an critical evaluation of your activities and being able to spot the very little things that  brings more results to you than others, they're not always a lot of them. The mistake you're making is that you're just picking it instead of allowing a proper evaluation of the results you get from your activities. It's not just something you think up, it's something you observe over a period of time with data before reaching a conclusion. I made the early mistakes of just picking things I thought we're important and failed. You must evaluate processes very well and compare results before you can comfortably point out the 20% activities or entities that gives you 80% of desired results, those you should focus more on and give it 80% of your time or resources while you give the remaining 20% of your time or resources to the remaining 80% of activities that are of little productive value but are still important. Again you should still have periodic reviews since some activities that brings results tends to decline in performance overtime and some that previously was passive would be proving valuable, it's always okay to include and exclude from the list when the need arises. Decisions are made from results and not guesses or thoughts.
You determine it from the results you get from your every tasks geared at productivity, it's kind of an critical evaluation of your activities and being able to spot the very little things that  brings more results to you than others, they're not always a lot of them. The mistake you're making is that you're just picking it instead of allowing a proper evaluation of the results you get from your activities. It's not just something you think up, it's something you observe over a period of time with data before reaching a conclusion. I made the early mistakes of just picking things I thought we're important and failed. You must evaluate processes very well and compare results before you can comfortably point out the 20% activities or entities that gives you 80% of desired results, those you should focus more on and give it 80% of your time or resources while you give the remaining 20% of your time or resources to the remaining 80% of activities that are of little productive value but are still important. Again you should still have periodic reviews since some activities that brings results tends to decline in performance overtime and some that previously was passive would be proving valuable, it's always okay to include and exclude from the list when the need arises. Decisions are made from results and not guesses or thoughts.

You determine it from the results you get from your every tasks geared at productivity, it's kind of an critical evaluation of your activities and being able to spot the very little things that  brings more results to you than others, they're not always a lot of them. The mistake you're making is that you're just picking it instead of allowing a proper evaluation of the results you get from your activities. It's not just something you think up, it's something you observe over a period of time with data before reaching a conclusion. I made the early mistakes of just picking things I thought we're important and failed. You must evaluate processes very well and compare results before you can comfortably point out the 20% activities or entities that gives you 80% of desired results, those you should focus more on and give it 80% of your time or resources while you give the remaining 20% of your time or resources to the remaining 80% of activities that are of little productive value but are still important. Again you should still have periodic reviews since some activities that brings results tends to decline in performance overtime and some that previously was passive would be proving valuable, it's always okay to include and exclude from the list when the need arises. Decisions are made from results and not guesses or thoughts.

You determine it from the results you get from your every tasks geared at productivity, it's kind of an critical evaluation of your activities and being able to spot the very little things that  brings more results to you than others, they're not always a lot of them. The mistake you're making is that you're just picking it instead of allowing a proper evaluation of the results you get from your activities. It's not just something you think up, it's something you observe over a period of time with data before reaching a conclusion. I made the early mistakes of just picking things I thought we're important and failed. You must evaluate processes very well and compare results before you can comfortably point out the 20% activities or entities that gives you 80% of desired results, those you should focus more on and give it 80% of your time or resources while you give the remaining 20% of your time or resources to the remaining 80% of activities that are of little productive value but are still important. Again you should still have periodic reviews since some activities that brings results tends to decline in performance overtime and some that previously was passive would be proving valuable, it's always okay to include and exclude from the list when the need arises. Decisions are made from results and not guesses or thoughts.