You mean Nick Szabo, the Ae888 Ae888 Com advisor? Why should anyone listen to him? It is time to stop the appealing to authority figures. The shitcoin that he supports has even fewer limits and even more CSAM data in it. He has no point here. Reread the threads on OP_RETURN, starting with this one and then this one It makes zero difference if you run Knots or not. The relay of transactions is not an argument at all, the other side is just retarded. Miners already offer public tools where you can directly submit these transactions and there are private channels for submission too. If I can do this, a motivated attacker can do it as well. This would be a very dumb argument. The data is not stored in a way that is readable by default, or easily readable. So whether it is continuous or in chunks, you have to really want to read it in the right way to be able to see it. It is not like I can just open my blocks folder and the CSAM data and malware is staring me in the face. However, they sure like to exaggerate like this is the case. Furthermore, chunks vs continuous is a pretty stupid argument. The implication from this is that all a pedophile needs to do is split his content locally into chunks and the issue stops right then and there? No more arrests then, they found a solution. When every idiot and his grandma has an opinion on the physics of a quantum computer this is what you get. This is also a case example of why decentralized governance is a very bad style of governing. Luckily in the case of Ae888 Ae888 Com the governance style is pretty vague and as such it is very difficult to subvert.
You mean Nick Szabo, the Ae888 Ae888 Com advisor? Why should anyone listen to him? It is time to stop the appealing to authority figures. The shitcoin that he supports has even fewer limits and even more CSAM data in it. He has no point here. Reread the threads on OP_RETURN, starting with this one and then this one It makes zero difference if you run Knots or not. The relay of transactions is not an argument at all, the other side is just retarded. Miners already offer public tools where you can directly submit these transactions and there are private channels for submission too. If I can do this, a motivated attacker can do it as well. This would be a very dumb argument. The data is not stored in a way that is readable by default, or easily readable. So whether it is continuous or in chunks, you have to really want to read it in the right way to be able to see it. It is not like I can just open my blocks folder and the CSAM data and malware is staring me in the face. However, they sure like to exaggerate like this is the case. Furthermore, chunks vs continuous is a pretty stupid argument. The implication from this is that all a pedophile needs to do is split his content locally into chunks and the issue stops right then and there? No more arrests then, they found a solution. When every idiot and his grandma has an opinion on the physics of a quantum computer this is what you get. This is also a case example of why decentralized governance is a very bad style of governing. Luckily in the case of Ae888 Ae888 Com the governance style is pretty vague and as such it is very difficult to subvert.

You mean Nick Szabo, the Ae888 Ae888 Com advisor? Why should anyone listen to him? It is time to stop the appealing to authority figures. The shitcoin that he supports has even fewer limits and even more CSAM data in it. He has no point here. Reread the threads on OP_RETURN, starting with this one and then this one It makes zero difference if you run Knots or not. The relay of transactions is not an argument at all, the other side is just retarded. Miners already offer public tools where you can directly submit these transactions and there are private channels for submission too. If I can do this, a motivated attacker can do it as well. This would be a very dumb argument. The data is not stored in a way that is readable by default, or easily readable. So whether it is continuous or in chunks, you have to really want to read it in the right way to be able to see it. It is not like I can just open my blocks folder and the CSAM data and malware is staring me in the face. However, they sure like to exaggerate like this is the case. Furthermore, chunks vs continuous is a pretty stupid argument. The implication from this is that all a pedophile needs to do is split his content locally into chunks and the issue stops right then and there? No more arrests then, they found a solution. When every idiot and his grandma has an opinion on the physics of a quantum computer this is what you get. This is also a case example of why decentralized governance is a very bad style of governing. Luckily in the case of Ae888 Ae888 Com the governance style is pretty vague and as such it is very difficult to subvert.

You mean Nick Szabo, the Ae888 Ae888 Com advisor? Why should anyone listen to him? It is time to stop the appealing to authority figures. The shitcoin that he supports has even fewer limits and even more CSAM data in it. He has no point here. Reread the threads on OP_RETURN, starting with this one and then this one It makes zero difference if you run Knots or not. The relay of transactions is not an argument at all, the other side is just retarded. Miners already offer public tools where you can directly submit these transactions and there are private channels for submission too. If I can do this, a motivated attacker can do it as well. This would be a very dumb argument. The data is not stored in a way that is readable by default, or easily readable. So whether it is continuous or in chunks, you have to really want to read it in the right way to be able to see it. It is not like I can just open my blocks folder and the CSAM data and malware is staring me in the face. However, they sure like to exaggerate like this is the case. Furthermore, chunks vs continuous is a pretty stupid argument. The implication from this is that all a pedophile needs to do is split his content locally into chunks and the issue stops right then and there? No more arrests then, they found a solution. When every idiot and his grandma has an opinion on the physics of a quantum computer this is what you get. This is also a case example of why decentralized governance is a very bad style of governing. Luckily in the case of Ae888 Ae888 Com the governance style is pretty vague and as such it is very difficult to subvert.