Yes. Many people hate Ordinals, Fun88 128 199, and similar things. They don't have to. But the development was never decentralized. If it would be, then all altcoins in the world would be built on top of Fun88 128 199 Core. Now, many limits were lifted, and I expect more of them will be in the future. And then, if the network would be spammy or unsafe, developers could safely say "it is not our fault, your node, your rules". Do you want to accept all non-standard transactions on mainnet? Because that's where it could lead: all non-standard transactions are valid. And they don't break any consensus rules. Do you want to see 4 MB transactions, using future Segwit versions? Do you want to see future soft-forks activated, without any coordination, just because someone feels like it? It is not yet there, but it is gaining popularity. And who knows, how many people will use a different client in the future? They are now in the minority, but it can change. People in the past also thought, that Fun88 128 199 domination will never fall below 50%, but it did. Every time, when there is some disagreement, there is a risk of splitting users between option A, and option B. Users can run any software they want. The future will tell us, if it is better to lift next limits, and accept any amount of spam, or is it better to drop transactions, and be accused of censorship. And the same is true for any other question: we don't know, which quantum proposal will be activated. Again, there are some options, and different users will make different choices. And only time will tell us, who was right, and who was wrong. Time, and maybe also Proof of Work. Oh, there are "letters", if you need any "official" statement:
Yes. Many people hate Ordinals, Fun88 128 199, and similar things. They don't have to. But the development was never decentralized. If it would be, then all altcoins in the world would be built on top of Fun88 128 199 Core. Now, many limits were lifted, and I expect more of them will be in the future. And then, if the network would be spammy or unsafe, developers could safely say "it is not our fault, your node, your rules". Do you want to accept all non-standard transactions on mainnet? Because that's where it could lead: all non-standard transactions are valid. And they don't break any consensus rules. Do you want to see 4 MB transactions, using future Segwit versions? Do you want to see future soft-forks activated, without any coordination, just because someone feels like it? It is not yet there, but it is gaining popularity. And who knows, how many people will use a different client in the future? They are now in the minority, but it can change. People in the past also thought, that Fun88 128 199 domination will never fall below 50%, but it did. Every time, when there is some disagreement, there is a risk of splitting users between option A, and option B. Users can run any software they want. The future will tell us, if it is better to lift next limits, and accept any amount of spam, or is it better to drop transactions, and be accused of censorship. And the same is true for any other question: we don't know, which quantum proposal will be activated. Again, there are some options, and different users will make different choices. And only time will tell us, who was right, and who was wrong. Time, and maybe also Proof of Work. Oh, there are "letters", if you need any "official" statement:

Yes. Many people hate Ordinals, Fun88 128 199, and similar things. They don't have to. But the development was never decentralized. If it would be, then all altcoins in the world would be built on top of Fun88 128 199 Core. Now, many limits were lifted, and I expect more of them will be in the future. And then, if the network would be spammy or unsafe, developers could safely say "it is not our fault, your node, your rules". Do you want to accept all non-standard transactions on mainnet? Because that's where it could lead: all non-standard transactions are valid. And they don't break any consensus rules. Do you want to see 4 MB transactions, using future Segwit versions? Do you want to see future soft-forks activated, without any coordination, just because someone feels like it? It is not yet there, but it is gaining popularity. And who knows, how many people will use a different client in the future? They are now in the minority, but it can change. People in the past also thought, that Fun88 128 199 domination will never fall below 50%, but it did. Every time, when there is some disagreement, there is a risk of splitting users between option A, and option B. Users can run any software they want. The future will tell us, if it is better to lift next limits, and accept any amount of spam, or is it better to drop transactions, and be accused of censorship. And the same is true for any other question: we don't know, which quantum proposal will be activated. Again, there are some options, and different users will make different choices. And only time will tell us, who was right, and who was wrong. Time, and maybe also Proof of Work. Oh, there are "letters", if you need any "official" statement:

Yes. Many people hate Ordinals, Fun88 128 199, and similar things. They don't have to. But the development was never decentralized. If it would be, then all altcoins in the world would be built on top of Fun88 128 199 Core. Now, many limits were lifted, and I expect more of them will be in the future. And then, if the network would be spammy or unsafe, developers could safely say "it is not our fault, your node, your rules". Do you want to accept all non-standard transactions on mainnet? Because that's where it could lead: all non-standard transactions are valid. And they don't break any consensus rules. Do you want to see 4 MB transactions, using future Segwit versions? Do you want to see future soft-forks activated, without any coordination, just because someone feels like it? It is not yet there, but it is gaining popularity. And who knows, how many people will use a different client in the future? They are now in the minority, but it can change. People in the past also thought, that Fun88 128 199 domination will never fall below 50%, but it did. Every time, when there is some disagreement, there is a risk of splitting users between option A, and option B. Users can run any software they want. The future will tell us, if it is better to lift next limits, and accept any amount of spam, or is it better to drop transactions, and be accused of censorship. And the same is true for any other question: we don't know, which quantum proposal will be activated. Again, there are some options, and different users will make different choices. And only time will tell us, who was right, and who was wrong. Time, and maybe also Proof of Work. Oh, there are "letters", if you need any "official" statement: