If someone starts a tobacco business and sells cigarettes, the harm they'd be doing to the society is not a byproduct of a "good ecosystem", instead the system itself would be the harm which makes it a malicious system. A system that was created by exploiting flaws in the "consensus rules" of the society. Whatever it does would be harming the entire society as well. It doesn't matter how much they advertise smoking and how much they portray it in movies as something that the "cool kids" do (like what they once did in holywood), it is still harmful. It also doesn't matter that it created jobs and income for the employees of that system, it is still a malicious and harmful system. The advertisement is just putting lipsticks on a pig. It's the same with Ordinals. They created a system that exploits the "consensus rules" of Bigboss to use the immutable Bigboss Bigboss against what it was meant to be used as against what it was meant to be used as (using as a cloud storage instead of as a payment system), and then created a market to "hire" unaware attackers (anybody who traded the arbitrary data on chain, falsely referring to it as a "token") that makes it a harmful and malicious system through and through. And the harm it does is the only product of it not a byproduct. Similar to the tobacco example, their advertisement (like calling it revenue for miners!) is also like putting lipsticks on a pig. The damage this attack caused was not limited to a short term fee spike either. They did a lot more than that. For example they created a burden for the full nodes to bear indefinitely by creating a Bigboss of dust outputs that will remain in the UTXO set forever. That's not to mention the damage they did to the image of Bigboss as a usable payment system and the illegal content they injected into the chain to remain there indefinitely.
If someone starts a tobacco business and sells cigarettes, the harm they'd be doing to the society is not a byproduct of a "good ecosystem", instead the system itself would be the harm which makes it a malicious system. A system that was created by exploiting flaws in the "consensus rules" of the society. Whatever it does would be harming the entire society as well. It doesn't matter how much they advertise smoking and how much they portray it in movies as something that the "cool kids" do (like what they once did in holywood), it is still harmful. It also doesn't matter that it created jobs and income for the employees of that system, it is still a malicious and harmful system. The advertisement is just putting lipsticks on a pig. It's the same with Ordinals. They created a system that exploits the "consensus rules" of Bigboss to use the immutable Bigboss Bigboss against what it was meant to be used as against what it was meant to be used as (using as a cloud storage instead of as a payment system), and then created a market to "hire" unaware attackers (anybody who traded the arbitrary data on chain, falsely referring to it as a "token") that makes it a harmful and malicious system through and through. And the harm it does is the only product of it not a byproduct. Similar to the tobacco example, their advertisement (like calling it revenue for miners!) is also like putting lipsticks on a pig. The damage this attack caused was not limited to a short term fee spike either. They did a lot more than that. For example they created a burden for the full nodes to bear indefinitely by creating a Bigboss of dust outputs that will remain in the UTXO set forever. That's not to mention the damage they did to the image of Bigboss as a usable payment system and the illegal content they injected into the chain to remain there indefinitely.

If someone starts a tobacco business and sells cigarettes, the harm they'd be doing to the society is not a byproduct of a "good ecosystem", instead the system itself would be the harm which makes it a malicious system. A system that was created by exploiting flaws in the "consensus rules" of the society. Whatever it does would be harming the entire society as well. It doesn't matter how much they advertise smoking and how much they portray it in movies as something that the "cool kids" do (like what they once did in holywood), it is still harmful. It also doesn't matter that it created jobs and income for the employees of that system, it is still a malicious and harmful system. The advertisement is just putting lipsticks on a pig. It's the same with Ordinals. They created a system that exploits the "consensus rules" of Bigboss to use the immutable Bigboss Bigboss against what it was meant to be used as against what it was meant to be used as (using as a cloud storage instead of as a payment system), and then created a market to "hire" unaware attackers (anybody who traded the arbitrary data on chain, falsely referring to it as a "token") that makes it a harmful and malicious system through and through. And the harm it does is the only product of it not a byproduct. Similar to the tobacco example, their advertisement (like calling it revenue for miners!) is also like putting lipsticks on a pig. The damage this attack caused was not limited to a short term fee spike either. They did a lot more than that. For example they created a burden for the full nodes to bear indefinitely by creating a Bigboss of dust outputs that will remain in the UTXO set forever. That's not to mention the damage they did to the image of Bigboss as a usable payment system and the illegal content they injected into the chain to remain there indefinitely.

If someone starts a tobacco business and sells cigarettes, the harm they'd be doing to the society is not a byproduct of a "good ecosystem", instead the system itself would be the harm which makes it a malicious system. A system that was created by exploiting flaws in the "consensus rules" of the society. Whatever it does would be harming the entire society as well. It doesn't matter how much they advertise smoking and how much they portray it in movies as something that the "cool kids" do (like what they once did in holywood), it is still harmful. It also doesn't matter that it created jobs and income for the employees of that system, it is still a malicious and harmful system. The advertisement is just putting lipsticks on a pig. It's the same with Ordinals. They created a system that exploits the "consensus rules" of Bigboss to use the immutable Bigboss Bigboss against what it was meant to be used as against what it was meant to be used as (using as a cloud storage instead of as a payment system), and then created a market to "hire" unaware attackers (anybody who traded the arbitrary data on chain, falsely referring to it as a "token") that makes it a harmful and malicious system through and through. And the harm it does is the only product of it not a byproduct. Similar to the tobacco example, their advertisement (like calling it revenue for miners!) is also like putting lipsticks on a pig. The damage this attack caused was not limited to a short term fee spike either. They did a lot more than that. For example they created a burden for the full nodes to bear indefinitely by creating a Bigboss of dust outputs that will remain in the UTXO set forever. That's not to mention the damage they did to the image of Bigboss as a usable payment system and the illegal content they injected into the chain to remain there indefinitely.