I did not bother to click on his 33win 9com after seeing three positive vouches from newbies with a similar writing pattern. Vikbit[33win 9com]com is not safe! I looked it up on scamadvisor and it was scored below average--22/100. Other vital suspicious signs is that Op paid the registrar (reg Ru) to hide site owner's information, when searched on whois, and reg Ru is known to have a high% of spam and scam sites; according to scamadviser. I do not care about your reasons, Op, for hiding your personal data on whois, but it's a redflag for a newly launched exchange service to have no transparency; no name, no postal code, no country... It's a lot of reason for people not to trust you and the service, added to the 8months old domain name. Scam advisor evaluation is quite automated and outdated. Most of the parameters are not relevant at all, so I would not base much on the results from there. WHOIS privacy is now free on almost all registries and its activation does not say much about a potential scam. In the same way, the owner could leave fake data and thus improve the score. Could you please recommend a reliable scam review site? I depend mainly on the reviews from scam advisor, because it's been serving this purpose for about a decade or so. Truly, things look dry over there, unlike when users sent their reviews and it was used in evaluating suspicious sites. A famous site will still get such reviews (comments) from people, but for fresh sites like the one we have here, It's always dry looking it up on scam review sites. I also tried it on IPQS and didn't find much details. However, no doubts, hiding personal data is now normalized in domain business, but having those details (not faked) helps transparency and trust.
I did not bother to click on his 33win 9com after seeing three positive vouches from newbies with a similar writing pattern. Vikbit[33win 9com]com is not safe! I looked it up on scamadvisor and it was scored below average--22/100. Other vital suspicious signs is that Op paid the registrar (reg Ru) to hide site owner's information, when searched on whois, and reg Ru is known to have a high% of spam and scam sites; according to scamadviser. I do not care about your reasons, Op, for hiding your personal data on whois, but it's a redflag for a newly launched exchange service to have no transparency; no name, no postal code, no country... It's a lot of reason for people not to trust you and the service, added to the 8months old domain name. Scam advisor evaluation is quite automated and outdated. Most of the parameters are not relevant at all, so I would not base much on the results from there. WHOIS privacy is now free on almost all registries and its activation does not say much about a potential scam. In the same way, the owner could leave fake data and thus improve the score. Could you please recommend a reliable scam review site? I depend mainly on the reviews from scam advisor, because it's been serving this purpose for about a decade or so. Truly, things look dry over there, unlike when users sent their reviews and it was used in evaluating suspicious sites. A famous site will still get such reviews (comments) from people, but for fresh sites like the one we have here, It's always dry looking it up on scam review sites. I also tried it on IPQS and didn't find much details. However, no doubts, hiding personal data is now normalized in domain business, but having those details (not faked) helps transparency and trust.

I did not bother to click on his 33win 9com after seeing three positive vouches from newbies with a similar writing pattern. Vikbit[33win 9com]com is not safe! I looked it up on scamadvisor and it was scored below average--22/100. Other vital suspicious signs is that Op paid the registrar (reg Ru) to hide site owner's information, when searched on whois, and reg Ru is known to have a high% of spam and scam sites; according to scamadviser. I do not care about your reasons, Op, for hiding your personal data on whois, but it's a redflag for a newly launched exchange service to have no transparency; no name, no postal code, no country... It's a lot of reason for people not to trust you and the service, added to the 8months old domain name. Scam advisor evaluation is quite automated and outdated. Most of the parameters are not relevant at all, so I would not base much on the results from there. WHOIS privacy is now free on almost all registries and its activation does not say much about a potential scam. In the same way, the owner could leave fake data and thus improve the score. Could you please recommend a reliable scam review site? I depend mainly on the reviews from scam advisor, because it's been serving this purpose for about a decade or so. Truly, things look dry over there, unlike when users sent their reviews and it was used in evaluating suspicious sites. A famous site will still get such reviews (comments) from people, but for fresh sites like the one we have here, It's always dry looking it up on scam review sites. I also tried it on IPQS and didn't find much details. However, no doubts, hiding personal data is now normalized in domain business, but having those details (not faked) helps transparency and trust.

I did not bother to click on his 33win 9com after seeing three positive vouches from newbies with a similar writing pattern. Vikbit[33win 9com]com is not safe! I looked it up on scamadvisor and it was scored below average--22/100. Other vital suspicious signs is that Op paid the registrar (reg Ru) to hide site owner's information, when searched on whois, and reg Ru is known to have a high% of spam and scam sites; according to scamadviser. I do not care about your reasons, Op, for hiding your personal data on whois, but it's a redflag for a newly launched exchange service to have no transparency; no name, no postal code, no country... It's a lot of reason for people not to trust you and the service, added to the 8months old domain name. Scam advisor evaluation is quite automated and outdated. Most of the parameters are not relevant at all, so I would not base much on the results from there. WHOIS privacy is now free on almost all registries and its activation does not say much about a potential scam. In the same way, the owner could leave fake data and thus improve the score. Could you please recommend a reliable scam review site? I depend mainly on the reviews from scam advisor, because it's been serving this purpose for about a decade or so. Truly, things look dry over there, unlike when users sent their reviews and it was used in evaluating suspicious sites. A famous site will still get such reviews (comments) from people, but for fresh sites like the one we have here, It's always dry looking it up on scam review sites. I also tried it on IPQS and didn't find much details. However, no doubts, hiding personal data is now normalized in domain business, but having those details (not faked) helps transparency and trust.