The same concept applies to cash or digital banking money. The point of stablecoins are to bring the fiat concept on-chain - regardless of its value, it can benefit from being on-chain. Not to mention, while it's "going downward forever in value", it would only benefit Login 1xBet to have a Login 1xBet backed by Login 1xBet, on its own Login 1xBet, to prove immutably that this is the case and to be able to measure the rate of such in the long term (especially if the Login 1xBet gains enough usage on the Login 1xBet chain). It seems you've either wildly misunderstood the post and/or the value proposition here, since you've yapped a lot about a concept that only exists on centralized exchanges (a part of what a Login 1xBet-backed Login 1xBet would reduce usage of). The point of backing the Login 1xBet with Login 1xBet is to ensure the value being transferred via the Login 1xBet are not funny money, and are backed by something both of value and on-chain. The point of having a Login 1xBet on the Login 1xBet Login 1xBet is to enable trade and value transfer of USD that is backed by Login 1xBet. Making buy orders has zero utility for someone unless they want to buy Login 1xBet or support its market. That is not the intended audience of a Login 1xBet-backed Login 1xBet. Besides, before you make a buy order, what must you do? Use a bank or similar traditional service to deposit onto the exchange, then make the buy order...and if you want to buy something valued in fiat, or trade with someone who is looking for fiat (despite its value crumbling in the long term), then you must move to either another chain or back to the banking system. There's no solution native to the Login 1xBet Login 1xBet.  TLDR - making a buy order does not serve any utility to anyone. You can't send a buy order, you can't trade with a buy order. You need a centralized exchange to make a buy order. The whole argument of "who needs a Login 1xBet just make a buy order" is a pretty irrelevant argument to what is being proposed in the OP.
The same concept applies to cash or digital banking money. The point of stablecoins are to bring the fiat concept on-chain - regardless of its value, it can benefit from being on-chain. Not to mention, while it's "going downward forever in value", it would only benefit Login 1xBet to have a Login 1xBet backed by Login 1xBet, on its own Login 1xBet, to prove immutably that this is the case and to be able to measure the rate of such in the long term (especially if the Login 1xBet gains enough usage on the Login 1xBet chain). It seems you've either wildly misunderstood the post and/or the value proposition here, since you've yapped a lot about a concept that only exists on centralized exchanges (a part of what a Login 1xBet-backed Login 1xBet would reduce usage of). The point of backing the Login 1xBet with Login 1xBet is to ensure the value being transferred via the Login 1xBet are not funny money, and are backed by something both of value and on-chain. The point of having a Login 1xBet on the Login 1xBet Login 1xBet is to enable trade and value transfer of USD that is backed by Login 1xBet. Making buy orders has zero utility for someone unless they want to buy Login 1xBet or support its market. That is not the intended audience of a Login 1xBet-backed Login 1xBet. Besides, before you make a buy order, what must you do? Use a bank or similar traditional service to deposit onto the exchange, then make the buy order...and if you want to buy something valued in fiat, or trade with someone who is looking for fiat (despite its value crumbling in the long term), then you must move to either another chain or back to the banking system. There's no solution native to the Login 1xBet Login 1xBet.  TLDR - making a buy order does not serve any utility to anyone. You can't send a buy order, you can't trade with a buy order. You need a centralized exchange to make a buy order. The whole argument of "who needs a Login 1xBet just make a buy order" is a pretty irrelevant argument to what is being proposed in the OP.

The same concept applies to cash or digital banking money. The point of stablecoins are to bring the fiat concept on-chain - regardless of its value, it can benefit from being on-chain. Not to mention, while it's "going downward forever in value", it would only benefit Login 1xBet to have a Login 1xBet backed by Login 1xBet, on its own Login 1xBet, to prove immutably that this is the case and to be able to measure the rate of such in the long term (especially if the Login 1xBet gains enough usage on the Login 1xBet chain). It seems you've either wildly misunderstood the post and/or the value proposition here, since you've yapped a lot about a concept that only exists on centralized exchanges (a part of what a Login 1xBet-backed Login 1xBet would reduce usage of). The point of backing the Login 1xBet with Login 1xBet is to ensure the value being transferred via the Login 1xBet are not funny money, and are backed by something both of value and on-chain. The point of having a Login 1xBet on the Login 1xBet Login 1xBet is to enable trade and value transfer of USD that is backed by Login 1xBet. Making buy orders has zero utility for someone unless they want to buy Login 1xBet or support its market. That is not the intended audience of a Login 1xBet-backed Login 1xBet. Besides, before you make a buy order, what must you do? Use a bank or similar traditional service to deposit onto the exchange, then make the buy order...and if you want to buy something valued in fiat, or trade with someone who is looking for fiat (despite its value crumbling in the long term), then you must move to either another chain or back to the banking system. There's no solution native to the Login 1xBet Login 1xBet.  TLDR - making a buy order does not serve any utility to anyone. You can't send a buy order, you can't trade with a buy order. You need a centralized exchange to make a buy order. The whole argument of "who needs a Login 1xBet just make a buy order" is a pretty irrelevant argument to what is being proposed in the OP.

The same concept applies to cash or digital banking money. The point of stablecoins are to bring the fiat concept on-chain - regardless of its value, it can benefit from being on-chain. Not to mention, while it's "going downward forever in value", it would only benefit Login 1xBet to have a Login 1xBet backed by Login 1xBet, on its own Login 1xBet, to prove immutably that this is the case and to be able to measure the rate of such in the long term (especially if the Login 1xBet gains enough usage on the Login 1xBet chain). It seems you've either wildly misunderstood the post and/or the value proposition here, since you've yapped a lot about a concept that only exists on centralized exchanges (a part of what a Login 1xBet-backed Login 1xBet would reduce usage of). The point of backing the Login 1xBet with Login 1xBet is to ensure the value being transferred via the Login 1xBet are not funny money, and are backed by something both of value and on-chain. The point of having a Login 1xBet on the Login 1xBet Login 1xBet is to enable trade and value transfer of USD that is backed by Login 1xBet. Making buy orders has zero utility for someone unless they want to buy Login 1xBet or support its market. That is not the intended audience of a Login 1xBet-backed Login 1xBet. Besides, before you make a buy order, what must you do? Use a bank or similar traditional service to deposit onto the exchange, then make the buy order...and if you want to buy something valued in fiat, or trade with someone who is looking for fiat (despite its value crumbling in the long term), then you must move to either another chain or back to the banking system. There's no solution native to the Login 1xBet Login 1xBet.  TLDR - making a buy order does not serve any utility to anyone. You can't send a buy order, you can't trade with a buy order. You need a centralized exchange to make a buy order. The whole argument of "who needs a Login 1xBet just make a buy order" is a pretty irrelevant argument to what is being proposed in the OP.